Search

Background and Aims: There are limited contemporary population-based data on Helicobacter pylori epidemiology and outcomes in the United States. Our primary aim was to create a validated cohort of veterans with H pylori testing or treatment using Veterans Health Administration data. Methods: Using Veterans Health Administration structured and unstructured data, we developed and validated 4 algorithms for H pylori infection (3 algorithms) and treatment status (1 algorithm). During the development phase, we iteratively modified each algorithm based on a manual review of random sets of electronic health records (reference standard). The a priori validation goal was to achieve a one-sided 95% confidence lower bound (LB) for positive predictive value (PPV) and/or negative predictive value (NPV) >90%. We applied the Bonferroni correction when both PPV and NPV were relevant. Results: For H pylori infection, we achieved 99.0% PPV (LB = 94.6%) and 100% NPV (LB = 96.4%) for discriminating H pylori positive vs negative status using structured (ie, laboratory tests) and 95% PPV (LB = 90.3%) and 97.9% NPV (LB = 93.9%) using unstructured (ie, histopathology reports) data. Diagnostic codes achieved 98% PPV (LB = 93.0%) for H pylori diagnosis. The treatment algorithm was composed of multiple antimicrobial combinations and overall achieved ≥98% PPV (LB = 93.0%) for H pylori treatment, except for amoxicillin/levofloxacin (PPV

Background and Aims: Gastrointestinal cancer incidence varies by race and ethnicity. In the United States (US), there are screening guidelines for esophageal cancer (EC) and colorectal cancer (CRC), but not gastric cancer (GC). We compared GC, CRC, and EC incidence among the most populous racial and ethnic groups to inform US interception strategies. Methods: We used SEER∗Stat to compare GC, CRC, and EC incidence rates across non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and the 8 largest Asian American populations using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 9 registries (2010–2014). Results: Noncardia GC incidence was highest among Korean (18.7 cases per 100,000) and lowest among NHW (1.4 cases per 100,000) Americans. CRC incidence was highest among non-Hispanic Black, Southeast Asian, and Japanese (35.9, 34.2, and 33.8 per 100,000, respectively) Americans and lowest among South Asian Americans (18.9 per 100,000). EC incidence was greatest in NHW (4.7 per 100,000) and lowest in Filipino (1.2 per 100,000) Americans. The incidence of noncardia GC slightly exceeded colon cancer in Korean American men (25.5 vs 22.4 per 100,000). GC surpassed EC incidence in all non-White racial and ethnic groups. Conclusion: The burden of GC, CRC, and EC differs based on race and ethnicity. Non-White racial and ethnic groups experience a disproportionate burden of GC for which systematic programs for cancer interception, similar to CRC and EC, are needed.

Background and Aims: There is a lack of convenient, sensitive, noninvasive strategies for screening and surveillance for colorectal neoplasia. An assay combining the results of circulating epithelial cells (CECs) and somatic mutations of cell-free DNA adjusting for age/sex using a unique algorithm is evaluated in patients requiring colonoscopy. Methods: A prospective single-site 458-subject study (asymptomatic: 43% screening/43% surveillance, enriched with 65 symptomatic subjects undergoing colonoscopy) was conducted. The test analyzed CECs and somatic mutations. The probability of advanced neoplasia (advanced adenoma [AA] and CRCs) was determined by logistic regression methods adjusted for expected CRC incidence rate, prior history of AA, and patient age and sex on a training subset. A linear predictor was developed to generate a score scaled from 0 to 100. The test performance was evaluated on an independent set of subjects using prespecified algorithms and cut point. Results: Based on a predefined clinical threshold and predictive model derived from the training set (n = 232), analysis of an independent asymptomatic validation set (n = 194) yielded 89% (lower exact one-sided 95% confidence interval [CI]: 80%) specificity and 100% (95% CI: 37%)/78% (95% CI: 61%) sensitivity for detection of CRC/AA. In a secondary analysis, excluding surveillance subjects, the 97-subject screening cohort yielded 91% (95% CI: 79%) specificity and CRC/AA sensitivity at 100% (95% CI: 37%)/83% (95% CI: 56%, 87% for advanced neoplasia 95% CI: 64%). Significant associations (P < .0001) were detected between FirstSight scores and adenoma size, number, and ordinally increasing pathology classification. Conclusion: A multimodal blood test that included CECs and somatic mutations with adjustment for age and sex demonstrated high sensitivity for the diagnosis of advanced colorectal neoplasia. The resulting score captures prognostic information for CRC progression of index adenoma size and number and has the potential to enable stratification of patients for screening or postpolypectomy surveillance colonoscopy.