Search

Background & Aims: Esophageal carcinoma is an aggressive disease with a very poor prognosis. Early tumor relapse after surgical resection in patients with node-negative esophageal carcinoma suggests that occult metastases may have been missed at the original pathologic examination. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of immunohistochemically detected occult lymph node microscopic metastases in patients with pathologic N0 esophageal carcinoma and the impact of these occult metastases on relapse-free survival. Methods: All patients (n = 124) with pathologic N0 esophageal carcinoma undergoing resection at our institution between January, 1994, and October, 1998, constituted the study population. Esophagectomy specimens were reevaluated by immunohistochemistry (monoclonal antibody against cytokeratin AE1/AE3). Clinical and pathologic features were summarized, and patient relapse-free survival was estimated. Results: Among the total of 124 patients, occult lymph node microscopic metastases were identified by immunohistochemistry in 14 patients (11%) (T1 mucosa, 4%; T1 submucosa, 6%; T2, 22%; and T3, 14%). Patients were followed for a median of 3.2 years. Relapse-free survival was not significantly associated with the presence of occult lymph node microscopic metastases as detected by immunohistochemistry ( P = 0.12). Advanced T stage (T3; P P Conclusions: In the present study, occult lymph node microscopic metastases in pathologic N0 esophageal carcinoma patients were less frequent than previously reported. T stage and lymphovascular invasion were significantly associated with relapse-free survival, although a significant association with occult lymph node metastases was not detected. GASTROENTEROLOGY 2002;122:1815-1821

Background & Aims: Therapy of esophageal carcinoma is stage dependent. The role of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS FNA) in this setting is unclear. The aims of this study were to compare the performance characteristics of CT, EUS, and EUS FNA for preoperative nodal staging of esophageal carcinoma and to measure the impact of each staging test on treatment decisions. Methods: From December 1999 to March 2001, all patients with esophageal carcinoma seen at the Mayo Clinic Rochester were prospectively evaluated with CT, EUS, and EUS FNA. The impact of tumor stage on final therapy was assessed. Results: A total of 125 patients with esophageal carcinoma were enrolled. EUS FNA was more sensitive (83% vs. 29%; P < 0.001) than CT and more accurate than CT (87% vs. 51%; P < 0.001) or EUS (87% vs. 74%; P = 0.012) for nodal staging. Direct surgical resection was contraindicated in 77% of patients evaluated due to advanced locoregional/metastatic disease. Tumor location, patient age, comorbidities, and tumor stage determined by CT, EUS, and EUS FNA were associated with treatment decisions (P < 0.05). EUS FNA resulting in a higher/worse stage than CT (41 patients) was associated with a greater rate of treatments that were not direct surgeries compared with cases in which the stage was the same or better. Conclusions: EUS FNA is more accurate for nodal staging and impacts on therapy of patients with esophageal carcinoma. EUS FNA should be included in the preoperative staging algorithm of these patients.