1. Endoscopic submucosal dissection with adaptive traction strategy: first prospective multicenter study (with video).
- Author
-
Grimaldi J, Masgnaux LJ, Lafeuille P, de Cristofaro E, Rivory J, Ponchon T, Yzet C, Wallenhorst T, Alexandru L, Legros R, Rostain F, Jérémie J, and Pioche M
- Subjects
- Humans, Prospective Studies, Male, Female, Aged, Middle Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Colonoscopy methods, Intestinal Mucosa surgery, Intestinal Perforation etiology, Intestinal Perforation surgery, Endoscopic Mucosal Resection methods, Endoscopic Mucosal Resection instrumentation, Colorectal Neoplasms surgery, Traction methods, Traction instrumentation, Operative Time
- Abstract
Background and Aims: Traction has become the reference strategy for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). One of its major limitations is that the force of traction decreases as dissection progresses. The ATRACT traction device (ATRACT Device and Co, Lyon, France) uses a pulley system to increase traction during the procedure, making it easier and faster. A retrospective study of 54 cases showed interesting results in terms of efficacy and safety throughout the digestive tract. We sought to confirm these initial results with a prospective study of resections of colorectal lesions., Methods: In this prospective multicenter study, 5 experienced operators from 3 different centers each performed 10 procedures using the ATRACT device consecutively for all conventional colorectal ESDs measuring between 4 and 10 cm in conventional locations (no recurrent lesions, appendicular, of the ileocecal valve, in contact with the pectinate line, or measuring more than two-thirds of the circumference)., Results: Between November 2022 and April 2023, 50 ESDs were performed in 49 patients. On average, the main diameter of the lesions was 66.6 mm, with a surface area of 3066 mm
2 . The mean operating time was 55.2 minutes, resulting in a mean resection speed of 61.4 mm2 /min. En bloc and R0 resection rates were 100% and 98%, respectively. Resections were curative in 94% of cases. Four (8%) perforations occurred, all of which were closed endoscopically without the need for surgery. One (2%) case of delayed hemorrhage was noted. To date, this is the series with the highest resection speeds in the literature for colorectal ESD. For comparison, previous studies reported a speed of 23.5 mm2 /min using the "pocket" strategy and a speed of 39.1 mm2 /min using the double-clip traction technique. These results need to be confirmed in larger studies and in nonexpert centers., Conclusions: This prospective evaluation confirms the efficacy and safety of the adaptive traction strategy with the ATRACT device for colorectal ESD with high resection speed., Competing Interests: Disclosure The following authors disclosed financial relationships: J. Grimaldi: Cofounder of ATRACT Device and Co. L.-J. Masgnaux: Cofounder of ATRACT Device and Co. J. Rivory: Cofounder of ATRACT Device and Co; training sessions in endoscopy for Olympus, Cook Medical, and Boston scientific. R. Legros: Cofounder of ATRACT Device and Co; training sessions in endoscopy for Olympus, Fuji, and Erbe. T. Wallenhorst: Training sessions in endoscopy for Olympus and Fujifilm. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF