Search

This extensive AWMF 085-002 S2e-guideline "First Trimester Diagnosis and Therapy @ 11 - 13 +6 of Gestation" has systematically analyzed high-quality studies and publications and the existing evidence (evidence tables) and produced recommendations (level of recommendation, level of evidence, strength of consensus). This guideline deals with the following topics in the context of the 11 - 13 +6 weeks scan: the legal basis, screening for anatomical malformations, screening for chromosomal defects, quality assessment and audit, screening for preeclampsia and FGR, screening for preterm birth, screening for abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), screening for velamentous cord insertion and vasa praevia, screening for diabetes mellitus and LGA. Screening for complications of pregnancy can best be carried out @ 11 - 13 +6 weeks of gestation. The issues of how to identify malformations, chromosomal abnormalities and certain disorders of placentation (high blood pressure and proteinuria, intrauterine growth retardation) have been solved. The problem of how to identify placenta percreta and vasa previa has been partially solved. What is still unsolved is how to identify disorders of glucose metabolism and preterm birth. In the first trimester, solutions to some of these problems are available: parents can be given extensive counselling and the risk that a pregnancy complication will manifest at a later stage can be delayed and reduced. This means that screening is critically important as it helps in decision-making about the best way to manage pregnancy complications (prevention and intervals between follow-up examinations). If no treatment is available and if a termination of pregnancy is considered, the intervention can be carried out with far lower complications compared to the second trimester of pregnancy. In most cases, further examinations are not required and the parents can be reassured. A repeat examination at around week 20 of gestation to complete the screening for malformations is recommended. Note: The guideline will be published simultaneously in the official journals of both professional societies (i.e. Ultraschall in der Medizin/European Journal of Ultrasound for the DEGUM and Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde for the DGGG)., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest See also the long version of the guideline: https://register.awmf.org/de/leitlinien/detail/085-002, (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

This extensive AWMF 085-002 S2e-guideline "First Trimester Diagnosis and Therapy @ 11 - 13 +6 Weeks of Gestation" has systematically analyzed high-quality studies and publications and the existing evidence (evidence tables) and produced recommendations (level of recommendation, level of evidence, strength of consensus). This guideline deals with the following topics in the context of the 11 - 13 +6 weeks scan: the legal basis, screening for anatomical malformations, screening for chromosomal defects, quality assessment and audit, screening for preeclampsia and FGR, screening for preterm birth, screening for abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), screening for velamentous cord insertion and vasa praevia, screening for diabetes mellitus and LGA. Screening for complications of pregnancy can best be carried out @ 11 - 13 +6 weeks of gestation. The issues of how to identify malformations, chromosomal abnormalities and certain disorders of placentation (high blood pressure and proteinuria, intrauterine growth retardation) have been solved. The problem of how to identify placenta percreta and vasa previa has been partially solved. What is still unsolved is how to identify disorders of glucose metabolism and preterm birth. In the first trimester, solutions to some of these problems are available: parents can be given extensive counselling and the risk that a pregnancy complication will manifest at a later stage can be delayed and reduced. This means that screening is critically important as it helps in decision-making about the best way to manage pregnancy complications (prevention and intervals between follow-up examinations). If no treatment is available and if a termination of pregnancy is considered, the intervention can be carried out with far lower complications compared to the second trimester of pregnancy. In most cases, further examinations are not required and the parents can be reassured. A repeat examination at around week 20 of gestation to complete the screening for malformations is recommended. Note: The guideline will be published simultaneously in the official journals of both professional societies (i.e. Ultraschall in der Medizin/European Journal of Ultrasound for the DEGUM and Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde for the DGGG)., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest See also the long German-language version of the guideline: https://register.awmf.org/de/leitlinien/detail/085-002, (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Chorionic villus sampling and placental biopsies became established diagnostic alternatives to amniocentesis worldwide during the 80's. Safety and accuracy are the most important criteria for the evaluation of these newer techniques as compared to amniocentesis. We report on our experience with more than 3400 chromosome analyses between 1985 and 1990 from first to third trimester of pregnancy in a single centre. Most obvious is the higher frequency of mosaicism, which is often, but not always confined to the placenta. Mosaicism accounts for the overwhelming majority of all discrepant (so-called false negative or false positive) cytogenetic findings. The most important prerequisites for diagnostic accuracy of chromosome analyses are meticulous separation of villi immediately after the sampling procedure as well as simultaneous use of direct preparation and cell culture. If mosaicism is not taken as sound evidence for foetal aneuploidy, the accuracy of cytogenetic diagnoses after chorionic villus sampling and placental biopsies is in the same range as the one after amniocentesis.

A retrospective evaluation of 463 prenatal chromosome analyses in a total of 375 patients with suspicious ultrasound findings, revealed a high rate of severe chromosomal abnormalities (16%). The highest risk for an abnormal karyotype was found after sonographic detection of hygroma colli. Abnormal chromosome counts were also frequently found in fetuses with omphaloceles, duodenal atresia and hydrops fetalis, as well as in presence of intrauterine growth retardation and/or anomalies of the amniotic fluid volume. The anomalies mentioned above are, therefore, an urgent indication for a prenatal chromosome analysis. The technical improvements of ultrasound machines and growing experience of operators will lead to an increasing importance of sonography as a method for the identification of pregnancies, that are at high risk for chromosomal abnormalities.