Search

Detailed chromosome photomaps are the first step to develop further chromosomal analysis to study the evolution of the genetic architecture in any set of species, considering that chromosomal rearrangements, such as inversions, are common features of genome evolution. In this report, we analyzed inversion polymorphisms in 25 different populations belonging to six neotropical species in the cardini group: Drosophila cardini, D. cardinoides, D. neocardini, D. neomorpha, D. parthenogenetica and D. polymorpha. Furthermore, we present the first reference photomaps for the Neotropical D. cardini and D. parthenogenetica and improved photomaps for D. cardinoides, D. neocardini and D. polymorpha. We found 19 new inversions for these species. An exhaustive pairwise comparison of the polytene chromosomes was conducted for the six species in order to understand evolutionary patterns of their chromosomes.

Despite the interest of several authors, the karyotype of the labrid C. julis is still debated and in particular the presence of sex-chromosomes is still contradictory. In order to analyze the karyotype organization of C. julis we have performed an analysis with classical and molecular cytogenetic techniques. Our results after silver-, CMA3- and DAPI-staining, C-banding and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using 28S rDNA, 5S rDNA, and telomeric repeat (TTAGGG)n as probes allowed us to characterize the chromosomal location of several repetitive DNAs of C. julis. Finally, regardless of the technique used, no difference in the chromosome complement was found between males and females.

A chromosomal analysis of the monitor Varanus acanthurus Boulenger has been made using G- and C-banding and silver-staining techniques. This species has two cytotypes, one of which has a pericentric-inversion polymorphism, whereas the other is chromosomally monomorphic. A ZZ/ZW sex-chromosome system is also present in both cytotypes of this species. The banding patterns of these mechanisms are described and their evolution is discussed.

Chromosomes were examined from 13 Leptinotarsa species: L. decemlineata, L. texana, L. defecta, L. juncta, L. rubiginosa, L. haldemani, L. tumamoca, L. peninsularis, L. behrensi, L. heydeni, L. lineolata, L. typographica, and L. undecimlineata. With the exception of L. undecimlineata, which has 2n=32+XO, all other species have the basic chromosome number 2n=34+XO. Of two Labidomera species also examined, L. clivicollis has 2n=32+XO and L. suturella has 2n=30+XO. Idiograms showed that the majority of the autosomes are submetacentric. All species have a large submetacentric X chromosome. Meiotic pairings were regular with both closed and open bivalents. Chiasma frequencies varied considerably among species and even between populations. No distinct correlation was evident when chromosome numbers and chiasma frequencies were compared with host plant association and geographic distribution patterns of Leptinotarsa species.

In Drosophila ananassae, three cosmopolitan inversions are very common in natural populations. Chromosomal polymorphism due to these inversions often persists when strains are maintained in the laboratory. A chromosomal analysis of a number of strains was made. Data on the frequencies of different gene sequences will be described separately. During the present investigation the same data have been analyzed in order to test the intra- and interchromosomal interactions in D. ananassae. The results reveal that interchromosomal interactions do not occur with respect to viability as unlinked inversions are associated randomly. However, the linked inversions of the third chromosome show non-random associations maintained by epistatic gene interaction and suppression of crossing over.

Strains of Drosophila ananassae, each descended from a single inseminated female collected in nature, were maintained in laboratory cultures for 10 to nearly 50 generations. The chromosomal analysis of these strains was made immediately after their capture and chromosomal inversions were detected. The same strains were re-examined and it was found that all the strains remained polymorphic during the course of time. Although some of the strains did not show the same chromosomes which were ascertained at the original examination, they failed to become homozygous in all the chromosomes. Some old strains maintained for more than 100 generations but not established by the author were also examined and showed a persistence of inversion polymorphism.

The karyotypes of four species of Dyscophinae and eight species of Cophylinae were analyzed. The chromosome number was 2n=26 in all cases. Between the two subfamilies a difference in the form of the karyotype was observed; the chromosomes show a gradual decrease in length in the Dyscophinae, whereas in the Cophylinae the karyotype demonstrates a clear discontinuity of size between pairs 5 and 6. Chromosomal polymorphism was found in Plethodontohyla tuberata, the chromosomes of pair 4 were subtelocentric in the homozygous specimens, whereas this pair showed a subtelocentric and a submetacentric chromosome of equal length in the heterozygous one, suggesting a pericentric inversion. Although in the Cophylinae the chromosome number is constant, the number of chromosome arms is variable. Pericentric inversions seem to play an important role in the chromosomal evolution of the Cophylinae.