1. Variant classification changes over time in BRCA1 and BRCA2
- Author
-
Yvonne Bombard, Chloe Mighton, Jordan Lerner-Ellis, Matthew S. Lebo, Andy Kin On Wong, Marina Wang, George S. Charames, Nicholas A. Watkins, Kathleen-Rose Zakoor, and Salma Shickh
- Subjects
BRCA2 Protein ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,BRCA1 Protein ,Information Dissemination ,business.industry ,Molecular pathology ,Genetic Variation ,Breast Neoplasms ,Genomics ,Molecular diagnostics ,Likely benign ,Internal medicine ,Databases, Genetic ,Humans ,Medicine ,Medical genetics ,Female ,Genetic Predisposition to Disease ,Genetic Testing ,business ,Uncertain significance ,Genetics (clinical) ,Likely pathogenic ,Genetic testing - Abstract
To report BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) variant reassessments and reclassifications between 2012 and 2017 at the Advanced Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory (AMDL) in Toronto, Canada, which provides BRCA1/2 testing for patients in Ontario, and to compare AMDL variant classifications with submissions in ClinVar. Variants were assessed using a standardized variant assessment tool based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology’s guidelines and tracked in an in-house database. Variants were shared through the Canadian Open Genetics Repository and submitted to ClinVar for comparison against other laboratories. AMDL identified 1209 BRCA1/2 variants between 2012 and 2017. During this period, 32.9% (398/1209) of variants were reassessed and 12.4% (150/1209) were reclassified. The majority of reclassified variants were downgraded (112/150, 74.7%). Of the reclassified variants, 63.3% (95/150) were reclassified to benign, 20.7% (31/150) to likely benign, 10.0% (15/150) to variant of uncertain significance, 2.0% (3/150) to likely pathogenic, and 4.0% (6/150) to pathogenic. Discordant ClinVar submissions were found for 40.4% (488/1209) of variants. BRCA1/2 variants may be reclassified over time. Reclassification presents ethical and practical challenges related to recontacting patients. Data sharing is essential to improve variant interpretation, to help patients receive appropriate care based on their genetic results.
- Published
- 2019