Search

Purpose: The prevalence of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in homologous recombination repair (HRR) and Lynch syndrome (LS) genes in ovarian cancer (OC) is uncertain., Methods: An observational study reporting the detection rate of germline PVs in HRR and LS genes in all OC cases tested in the North West Genomic Laboratory Hub between September 1996 and May 2024. Effect sizes are reported using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for unselected cases tested between April 2021 and May 2024 versus 50,703 controls from the Breast Cancer Risk after Diagnostic Gene Sequencing study., Results: 2934 women were tested for BRCA1/2 and 433 (14.8%) had a PV. In up to 1572 women tested for PVs in non-BRCA1/2 HRR genes, detection rates were PALB2 = 0.8%, BRIP1 = 1.1%, RAD51C = 0.4% and RAD51D = 0.4%. In 940 unselected cases, BRIP1 (OR = 8.7, 95% CI 4.6-15.8) was the third most common OC predisposition gene followed by RAD51C (OR = 8.3, 95% CI 3.1-23.1), RAD51D (OR = 6.5, 95% CI 2.1-19.7), and PALB2 (OR = 3.9, 95% CI 1.5-10.3). No PVs in LS genes were detected in unselected cases., Conclusion: Panel testing in OC resulted in a detection rate of 2% to 3% for germline PVs in non-BRCA1/2 HRR genes, with the largest contributor being BRIP1. Screening for LS in unselected cases of OC is unnecessary., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Professor Gareth Evans has received consultancy fees from AstraZeneca and Everything Genetic Ltd. Professor Gordon Jayson has received research funding from AstraZeneca. Dr Andrew Clamp has received research funding from AstraZeneca. Dr Rosemary Lord has performed advisory work for GSK. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Germline testing in pediatric cancer presents opportunities and challenges. Understanding family perspectives, experiences, and preferences will optimize integration into routine care., Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched 4 databases for studies exploring perspectives, experiences, and preferences of parents/caregivers and/or patients regarding germline testing of children with cancer. Qualitative and quantitative data were extracted, organized, and summarized by research question and themes., Results: We identified 2286 unique articles, of which 24 were included. Interest in and uptake of testing was high. Families were motivated by altruism and a desire for inheritance/causation information. Testing barriers included psychological concerns, timing of the testing approach if offered at diagnosis or in a high-risk cancer setting and privacy/discrimination. Testing experiences highlighted challenges yet also positive impacts, with results providing psychological relief and informing proactive decision making. Timing preferences varied; however, allowing time to adjust to a new diagnosis was a common theme. Most wanted to receive as many germline sequencing-related results as possible., Conclusion: Findings underscore the importance of integrating germline analyses into pediatric cancer care with flexibility and support for families facing challenges. Where possible, consent should be provided at a time that suits each family's situation with access to information aligning with their needs and preferences., Prospero: CRD42023444890., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The identification of germline BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic variants (PV) infer high remaining lifetime breast/ovarian cancer risks, but there is paucity of studies assessing breast cancer risk after ovarian cancer diagnosis., Methods: We reviewed the history of breast cancer in 895 PV heterozygotes (BRCA1 = 541). Cumulative annual breast cancer incidence was assessed at 2, 5, 10, and >10 years after ovarian cancer diagnosis date., Results: Breast cancer annual rates were evaluated in 701 assessable women with no breast cancer at ovarian diagnosis (BRCA1 = 425). Incidence was lower at 2 years (1.18%) and 2 to 5 years (1.13%) but rose thereafter for BRCA1 with incidence post 10 years in excess of 4% annually. Breast cancer pathology in BRCA1 PV heterozygotes showed less high-grade triple-negative breast cancer and more lower-grade hormone-receptor-positive cancer than women with no prior ovarian cancer. In the prospective cohort from ovarian cancer diagnosis, <4% of all deaths were caused by breast cancer, although 50% of deaths in women with breast cancer after ovarian cancer diagnosis were due to breast cancer., Conclusion: Women can be reassured that incidence of breast cancer after ovarian cancer diagnosis is relatively low. It appears likely that this effect is due to platinum-based chemotherapy. Nonetheless women need to be aware that incidence increases thereafter, especially after 10 years., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest D. Gareth Evans has received consultancy fees from AstraZeneca and EverythingGenetic Ltd. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Germline variant interpretation often depends on population-matched control cohorts. This is not feasible for population groups that are underrepresented in current population reference databases., Methods: We classify germline variants with population-matched controls for 2 ancestrally diverse cohorts of patients: 132 early-onset or familial colorectal carcinoma patients from Singapore and 100 early-onset colorectal carcinoma patients from the United States. The effects of using a population-mismatched control cohort are simulated by swapping the control cohorts used for each patient cohort, with or without the popmax computational strategy., Results: Population-matched classifications revealed a combined 62 pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in 34 genes across both cohorts. Using a population-mismatched control cohort resulted in misclassification of non-P/LP variants as P/LP, driven by the absence of ancestry-specific rare variants in the control cohort. Popmax was more effective in alleviating misclassifications for the Singapore cohort than the US cohort., Conclusion: Underrepresented population groups can suffer from higher rates of false-positive P/LP results. Popmax can partially alleviate these misclassifications, but its efficacy still depends on the degree with which the population groups are represented in the control cohort., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Soo-Chin Lee reports grant support/research collaborations with Pfizer, Eisai, Taiho, ACT Genomics, Bayer, and MSD; advisory board/speaker invitations from Pfizer, Novartis, Astra Zeneca, ACT Genomics, Eli Lilly, MSD, Roche, Eisai, and Daiichi-Sankyo; conference support from Amgen, Pfizer and Roche, all of which are outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders played no role in the design of the study, collection and analysis of data and decision to publish., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Females with biallelic CHEK2 germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) more often develop multiple breast cancers than individuals with monoallelic CHEK2 gPVs. This study is aimed at expanding the knowledge on the occurrence of other malignancies., Methods: Exome sequencing of individuals who developed multiple primary malignancies identified 3 individuals with the CHEK2 (NM&#95;007194.4) c.1100del p.(Thr367MetfsTer15) loss-of-function gPV in a biallelic state. We collected the phenotypes of an additional cohort of individuals with CHEK2 biallelic gPVs (n = 291)., Results: In total, 157 individuals (53.4%; 157/294 individuals) developed ≥1 (pre)malignancy. The most common (pre)malignancies next to breast cancer were colorectal- (n = 19), thyroid- (n = 19), and prostate (pre)malignancies (n = 12). Females with biallelic CHEK2 loss-of-function gPVs more frequently developed ≥2 (pre)malignancies and at an earlier age compared with females biallelic for the CHEK2 c.470T>C p.(Ile157Thr) missense variant. Furthermore, 26 males (31%; 26/84 males) with CHEK2 biallelic gPVs developed ≥1 (pre)malignancies of 15 origins., Conclusion: Our study suggests that CHEK2 biallelic gPVs likely increase the susceptibility to develop multiple malignancies in various tissues, both in females and males. However, it is possible that a substantial proportion of individuals with CHEK2 biallelic gPVs is missed as diagnostic testing for CHEK2 often is limited to individuals who developed breast cancer., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To identify likely germline DNA variants from sequential tumor profiling data from hematopoietic malignancies (HMs)., Methods: The coefficient of variance was calculated from variant allele frequency of next-generation sequencing assays. Variants' likelihood of being germline was ranked on a 1 to 5 scale. Outcomes were examined in patients with such variants., Results: In a pilot set of 33 genes, 89% of grade 1, 77% of grade 2, 62% of grade 3, 52% of grade 4, and 21% of grade 5 variants were confirmed to be germline. Among those, 22% were pathogenic or likely pathogenic in genes recognized as conferring hereditary HM risk, including BRCA1/2, CHEK2, CSF3R, and DDX41. To determine if this approach identified genes with known autosomal dominant inheritance, we analyzed sequential data from 1336 genes in 1135 HM patients. Among unique variants, 16% occurred in hereditary HM genes, and 15% were deleterious. Patients with grade 1/2 alleles had decreased survival 2 years after initial molecular testing (78% versus 88%, P = .0037) and increased all-cause mortality compared with those without (hazard ratio 2.02, 95% CI 1.18-3.46, P = .019)., Conclusion: Variant germline status may be predicted using sequential tumor profiling and patients with likely germline variants experience inferior outcomes compared with those without., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis Variant Curation Expert Panel (VCEP) was established by the International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours and the Clinical Genome Resource, who set out to develop recommendations for the interpretation of germline APC variants underlying Familial Adenomatous Polyposis, the most frequent hereditary polyposis syndrome., Methods: Through a rigorous process of database analysis, literature review, and expert elicitation, the APC VCEP derived gene-specific modifications to the ACMG/AMP (American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and Association for Molecular Pathology) variant classification guidelines and validated such criteria through the pilot classification of 58 variants., Results: The APC-specific criteria represented gene- and disease-informed specifications, including a quantitative approach to allele frequency thresholds, a stepwise decision tool for truncating variants, and semiquantitative evaluations of experimental and clinical data. Using the APC-specific criteria, 47% (27/58) of pilot variants were reclassified including 14 previous variants of uncertain significance (VUS)., Conclusion: The APC-specific ACMG/AMP criteria preserved the classification of well-characterized variants on ClinVar while substantially reducing the number of VUS by 56% (14/25). Moving forward, the APC VCEP will continue to interpret prioritized lists of VUS, the results of which will represent the most authoritative variant classification for widespread clinical use., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest SEP is a member of the scientific advisory panel of Baylor Genetics Laboratories. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest. Ethics Declaration This study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Bonn and the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. Participants of clinical genetic testing gave written informed consent for their data to be used for clinical research and genetic investigations according to local regulations., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Genome sequencing (GS) enables comprehensive molecular analysis of tumors and identification of hereditary cancer predisposition. According to guidelines, directly determining pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) requires pretest genetic counseling, which is cost-ineffective. Referral for genetic counseling based on tumor variants alone could miss relevant PGVs and/or result in unnecessary referrals., Methods: We validated GS for detection of germline variants and simulated 3 strategies using paired tumor-normal GS data of 937 metastatic patients. In strategy-1, genetic counseling before tumor testing allowed direct PGV analysis. In strategy-2 and -3, germline testing and referral for post-test genetic counseling is based on tumor variants using Dutch (strategy-2) or Europen Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Precision Medicine Working Group (strategy-3) guidelines., Results: In strategy-1, PGVs would be detected in 50 patients (number-needed-to counsel; NTC = 18.7). In strategy-2, 86 patients would have been referred for genetic counseling and 43 would have PGVs (NTC = 2). In strategy-3, 94 patients would have been referred for genetic counseling and 32 would have PGVs (NTC = 2.9). Hence, 43 and 62 patients, respectively, were unnecessarily referred based on a somatic variant., Conclusion: Both post-tumor test counseling strategies (2 and 3) had significantly lower NTC, and strategy-2 had the highest PGV yield. Combining pre-tumor test mainstreaming and post-tumor test counseling may maximize the clinically relevant PGV yield and minimize unnecessary referrals., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Kim Monkhorst reports research grants from AstraZeneca and speakers’ fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, AstraZeneca, and Benecke. Kim Monkhorst received consultancy fees from Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Diaceutics, Eli Lilly, Bayer, and Boehringer Ingelheim and nonfinancial support from Roche, Takeda, Pfizer, Personal Genome Diagnostics, and DELFi. Edwin Cuppen reports consultancy fees and support for attending meetings and traveling from Illumina. Emile E. Voest is member of the supervisory board of Hartwig Medical Foundation. Gerrit A. Meijer is cofounder and a board member (CSO) of CRCbioscreen BV, he has a research collaboration with CZ Health Insurances (cash matching to ZonMW grant), and he has research collaborations with Exact Sciences, Sysmex, Sentinel Ch. SpA, Personal Genome Diagnostics (PGDX), and DELFi; these companies provide materials, equipment, and/or sample/genomic analyses. Gerrit A. Meijer is an advisory board member of “Missie Tumor Onbekend.” All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Germline variants in POT1 have been implicated in predisposition to melanoma, sarcoma, and glioma in limited studies. Here, we determine the prevalence of cancer types in individuals with POT1 pathogenic variants (PVs) undergoing multigene panel testing (MGPT) for a broad variety of cancer indications., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of data provided on clinical documents from individuals with POT1 PVs identified via MGPT over a 5-year period. Tumor prevalence in POT1 PV heterozygotes was compared with MGPT-negative wild-type (WT) controls using χ 2 test., Results: POT1 PVs were identified in 227 individuals. POT1 PV and WT (n = 13,315) cohorts had a similar proportion of reported tumors (69.6% and 69.2%, respectively); however, POT1 PV heterozygotes were more likely to be diagnosed with multiple tumors (18.9% vs 8.7%; P < .001). Compared with POT1 WT, we identified a significant increase in melanoma (odds ratio 7.03; 95% CI 4.7-10.5; P < .001) and sarcoma (odds ratio 6.6; 95% CI 3.1-13.9; P < .001)., Conclusion: This analysis of the largest POT1 PV cohort to date validates the inclusion of POT1 in hereditary cancer MGPT and has the potential to impact clinical management recommendations, particularly for patients and families at risk for melanoma and sarcoma., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The following authors are paid employees of Ambry Genetics Corporation: Jennifer Herrera-Mullar, Kelly Fulk, Terra Brannan, Amal Yussuf, Linda Polfus, Marcy E. Richardson, and Carolyn Horton., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Although the role of CHEK2 germline pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition is well known, resources for managing CHEK2 heterozygotes in clinical practice are limited., Methods: An international workgroup developed guidance on clinical management of CHEK2 heterozygotes informed by peer-reviewed publications from PubMed., Results: Although CHEK2 is considered a moderate penetrance gene, cancer risks may be considered as a continuous variable, which are influenced by family history and other modifiers. Consequently, early cancer detection and prevention for CHEK2 heterozygotes should be guided by personalized risk estimates. Such estimates may result in both downgrading lifetime breast cancer risks to those similar to the general population or upgrading lifetime risk to a level at which CHEK2 heterozygotes are offered high-risk breast surveillance according to country-specific guidelines. Risk-reducing mastectomy should be guided by personalized risk estimates and shared decision making. Colorectal and prostate cancer surveillance should be considered based on assessment of family history. For CHEK2 heterozygotes who develop cancer, no specific targeted medical treatment is recommended at this time., Conclusion: Systematic prospective data collection is needed to establish the spectrum of CHEK2-associated cancer risks and to determine yet-unanswered questions, such as the outcomes of surveillance, response to cancer treatment, and survival after cancer diagnosis., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Funding and support listed here did not support development of this document unless included in the acknowledgments section. H.H. is supported by the Cancer Research CRUK Catalyst Award, CanGene-CanVar, and has served on advisory boards for AstraZeneca. R.S. is supported by the German Cancer Aid and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Germany. M.T. is supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre. D.R.S. is supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Rockville, Maryland, and also performs contract clinical telehealth services for Genome Medical, Inc., in accordance with relevant NCI ethics policies. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Clinical checklists are the standard of care to determine whether a child with cancer shows indications for genetic testing. Nevertheless, the efficacy of these tests to reliably detect genetic cancer predisposition in children with cancer is still insufficiently investigated., Methods: We assessed the validity of clinically recognizable signs to identify cancer predisposition by correlating a state-of-the-art clinical checklist to the corresponding exome sequencing analysis in an unselected single-center cohort of 139 child-parent data sets., Results: In total, one-third of patients had a clinical indication for genetic testing according to current recommendations, and 10.1% (14 of 139) of children harbored a cancer predisposition. Of these, 71.4% (10 of 14) were identified through the clinical checklist. In addition, >2 clinical findings in the checklist increased the likelihood to identifying genetic predisposition from 12.5% to 50%. Furthermore, our data revealed a high rate of genetic predisposition (40%, 4 of 10) in myelodysplastic syndrome cases, while no (likely) pathogenic variants were identified in the sarcoma and lymphoma group., Conclusion: In summary, our data show high checklist sensitivity, particularly in identifying childhood cancer predisposition syndromes. Nevertheless, the checklist used here also missed 29% of children with a cancer predisposition, highlighting the drawbacks of sole clinical evaluation and underlining the need for routine germline sequencing in pediatric oncology., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Cushing's disease (CD) is often explained by a single somatic sequence change. Germline defects, however, often go unrecognized. We aimed to determine the frequency and associated phenotypes of genetic drivers of CD in a large cohort., Methods: We studied 245 unrelated patients with CD (139 female, 56.7%), including 230 (93.9%) pediatric and 15 (6.1%) adult patients. Germline exome sequencing was performed in 184 patients; tumor exome sequencing was also done in 27 of them. A total of 43 germline samples and 92 tumor samples underwent Sanger sequencing of specific genes. Rare variants of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic (LP), or pathogenic variants in CD-associated genes, were identified., Results: Germline variants (13 variants of uncertain significance, 8 LP, and 11 pathogenic) were found in 8 of 19 patients (42.1%) with positive family history and in 23 of 226 sporadic patients (10.2%). Somatic variants (1 LP and 7 pathogenic) were found in 20 of 119 tested individuals (16.8%); one of them had a coexistent germline defect. Altogether, variants of interest were identified at the germline level in 12.2% of patients, at the somatic level in 7.8%, and coexisting germline and somatic variants in 0.4%, accounting for one-fifth of the cohort., Conclusion: We report an estimate of the contribution of multiple germline and somatic genetic defects underlying CD in a single cohort., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Models used to predict the probability of an individual having a pathogenic homozygous or heterozygous variant in a mismatch repair gene, such as MMRpro, are widely used. Recently, MMRpro was updated with new colorectal cancer penetrance estimates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive performance of MMRpro and other models for individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer., Methods: We performed a validation study of 4 models, Leiden, MMRpredict, PREMM 5 , and MMRpro, using 784 members of clinic-based families from the United States. Predicted probabilities were compared with germline testing results and evaluated for discrimination, calibration, and predictive accuracy. We analyzed several strategies to combine models and improve predictive performance., Results: MMRpro with additional tumor information (MMRpro+) and PREMM 5 outperformed the other models in discrimination and predictive accuracy. MMRpro+ was the best calibrated with an observed to expected ratio of 0.98 (95% CI = 0.89-1.08). The combination models showed improvement over PREMM 5 and performed similar to MMRpro+., Conclusion: MMRpro+ and PREMM 5 performed well in predicting the probability of having a pathogenic homozygous or heterozygous variant in a mismatch repair gene. They serve as useful clinical decision tools for identifying individuals who would benefit greatly from screening and prevention strategies., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest G.P. is a cofounder and equity holder in Phaeno Inc., a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Konica Minolta Precision Medicine, Inc (which includes Ambry Genetics and Invicro), and a consultant for Delfi Diagnostics and Foundation Medicine, Inc. D.B. and G.P. colead the BayesMendel lab, which develops and maintains the BayesMendel software package. This includes a variety of risk assessment tools including BRCAPRO, PancPRO, MelaPRO, MMRpro, and PanelPRO and is licensed for commercial use. All licensing revenues are used for software maintenance and upgrades. Neither BayesMendel lab leaders nor members derive personal income from BayesMendel licenses. D.B. and G.P. are coinventor of the Ask2me tool, which is commercially licensed. D.B.’s conflicts of interest are managed by Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. S.S. has been a consultant for Myriad Genetics, Inc and has rights to the inventor portion of licensing revenues for the PREMM model. Z.K.S.’s immediate family member serves as a consultant in Ophthalmology for Alcon, Adverum Biotechnologies, Gyroscope Therapeutics Limited, Neurogene Inc, and REGENXBIO Inc, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Heritable pathogenic variants in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) pathway cause Lynch syndrome, a condition that significantly increases risk of colorectal and other cancers. At least half of individuals tested using gene panel sequencing have a variant of uncertain significance or no variant identified leading to no diagnosis. To fill this diagnostic gap, we developed Cancer Risk C (CR-C), a flow variant assay test., Methods: In response to treatment with an alkylating agent, individual assays of the nuclear translocation of MLH1, MSH2, BARD1, PMS2, and BRCA2 proteins and the nuclear phosphorylation of the ATM and ATR proteins distinguished pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) from benign/likely benign variants in MMR genes., Results: A risk classification score based on MLH1, MSH2, and ATR assays was 100% sensitive and 98% specific. Causality of MMR P/LP variants was shown through gene editing and rescue. In individuals with suspected Lynch syndrome but no P/LP, CR-C identified most (73%) as having germline MMR defects. Direct comparison of CR-C on matched blood samples and lymphoblastoid cell lines yielded comparable results (r 2 > 0.9)., Conclusion: For identifying germline MMR defects, CR-C provides augmentation to traditional panel sequencing through greater accuracy, shorter turnaround time (48 hours), and performance on blood with minimal sample handling., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest H.O. and J.L. are members of the scientific advisory board for Morgan & Mendel Genomics Inc and own shares of the company. I.A., S.Y., A.S.T., P.N., N.M.L., R.K.P., M.A.J., D.D.B., S.G., and S.K. declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Some variants identified by multigene panel testing of DNA from blood present with low variant allele fraction (VAF), often a manifestation of clonal hematopoiesis. Research has shown that the proportion of variants with low VAF is especially high in TP53, the Li-Fraumeni syndrome gene. Based on the hypothesis that variants with low VAF are positively selected as drivers of clonal hematopoiesis, we investigated the use of VAF as a predictor of TP53 germline variant pathogenicity., Methods: We used data from 260,681 TP53 variants identified at 2 laboratories to compare the distribution of pathogenic and benign variants at different VAF intervals., Results: Likelihood ratios toward pathogenicity associated with a VAF < 26% equated to the American College of Medical Genetics/Association of Molecular Pathology strong strength level and were applicable for 1 in 5 variants of unknown significance., Conclusion: In conclusion, detection of variants with low VAF in blood can be considered an in vivo functional assay to aid assessment of TP53 variant pathogenicity., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Tina Pesaran, Kelly McGoldrick, Jill Dolinsky, and Lily Hoang are paid employees of Ambry Genetics. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Germline genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants has been a part of clinical practice for >2 decades. However, no studies have compared the cancer risks associated with missense pathogenic variants (PVs) with those associated with protein truncating (PTC) variants., Methods: We collected 582 informative pedigrees segregating 1 of 28 missense PVs in BRCA1 and 153 pedigrees segregating 1 of 12 missense PVs in BRCA2. We analyzed 324 pedigrees with PTC variants in BRCA1 and 214 pedigrees with PTC variants in BRCA2. Cancer risks were estimated using modified segregation analysis., Results: Estimated breast cancer risks were markedly lower for women aged >50 years carrying BRCA1 missense PVs than for the women carrying BRCA1 PTC variants (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.9 [2.4-6.2] for PVs vs 12.8 [5.7-28.7] for PTC variants; P = .01), particularly for missense PVs in the BRCA1 C-terminal domain (HR = 2.8 [1.4-5.6]; P = .005). In case of BRCA2, for women aged >50 years, the HR was 3.9 (2.0-7.2) for those heterozygous for missense PVs compared with 7.0 (3.3-14.7) for those harboring PTC variants. BRCA1 p.[Cys64Arg] and BRCA2 p.[Trp2626Cys] were associated with particularly low risks of breast cancer compared with other PVs., Conclusion: These results have important implications for the counseling of at-risk women who harbor missense PVs in the BRCA1/2 genes., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest F.J.C. has received consulting fees from Astrazeneca. A.S. has received consulting fees from Pfizer and Astra Zeneca. T.V.O.H. has received honoraria from Pfizer. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most frequently diagnosed cancer and 30% of all cases of CRC are believed to have a familial component and up to one-third of these (10%) are hereditary. Pathogenic germline variants in multiple genes have been associated with predisposition to hereditary CRC or polyposis. Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary CRC syndrome, caused by variants in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 and is inherited in a dominant manner. Heritable conditions associated with colonic polyposis include familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) associated with APC pathogenic variants, MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) caused by biallelic MUTYH pathogenic variants, and polymerase proofreading-associated polyposis (PPAP) caused by POLE or POLD1 pathogenic variants. Given the overlapping phenotypes of the cancer syndromes along with the limited sensitivity of using clinical criteria alone, a multigene panel testing approach to diagnose these conditions using next-generation sequencing (NGS) is effective and efficient. This technical standard is not recommended for use in the clinic for patient evaluation. Please refer to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines to determine an appropriate testing strategy and guide medical screening and management. This 2021 edition of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) technical standard supersedes the 2013 edition on this topic., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.)

Purpose: Despite the rapid uptake of multigene panel testing (MGPT) for hereditary cancer predisposition, there is limited guidance surrounding indications for testing and genes to include., Methods: To inform the clinical approach to hereditary cancer MGPT, we comprehensively evaluated 32 cancer predisposition genes by assessing phenotype-specific pathogenic variant (PV) frequencies, cancer risk associations, and performance of genetic testing criteria in a cohort of 165,000 patients referred for MGPT., Results: We identified extensive genetic heterogeneity surrounding predisposition to cancer types commonly referred for germline testing (breast, ovarian, colorectal, uterine/endometrial, pancreatic, and melanoma). PV frequencies were highest among patients with ovarian cancer (13.8%) and lowest among patients with melanoma (8.1%). Fewer than half of PVs identified in patients meeting testing criteria for only BRCA1/2 or only Lynch syndrome occurred in the respective genes (33.1% and 46.2%). In addition, 5.8% of patients with PVs in BRCA1/2 and 26.9% of patients with PVs in Lynch syndrome genes did not meet respective testing criteria., Conclusion: Opportunities to improve upon identification of patients at risk for hereditary cancer predisposition include revising BRCA1/2 and Lynch syndrome testing criteria to include additional clinically actionable genes with overlapping phenotypes and relaxing testing criteria for associated cancers.

Purpose: Clinical and experimental evidence has suggested pathobiological crosstalk between lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs) and cancer. We aimed to elucidate the association between germline variants in LSD genes and cancer., Methods: We performed aggregate rare variant association analysis of potentially pathogenic variants (PPVs) in 42 LSD genes and >30 histological types of cancer using genome sequencing data from 2567 cancer patients (Pan-Cancer cohort) and 2504 healthy individuals (1000 Genomes cohort) and exome sequencing data from 53,105 individuals without cancer (ExAC cohort)., Results: PPVs were significantly enriched in the Pan-Cancer cohort compared with the 1000 Genomes cohort (PPV prevalence, 20.7% vs. 13.5%; P = 8.7 × 10 -12 ). Cancer risk was higher in individuals with a greater number of PPVs (P = 7.3 × 10 -12 ). Population structure-adjusted optimal sequence kernel association test (SKAT-O) revealed 37 significantly associated cancer type-LSD gene pairs. These results were supported by the consistent tendency toward enrichment of PPVs in cancer patients compared with the ExAC cohort. Cancer developed earlier in PPV carriers than in wild-type patients. Analysis of tumor transcriptomic data from the pancreatic adenocarcinoma cohort revealed 508 genes differentially expressed according to PPV carrier status, which were highly enriched in the core signaling pathways of pancreatic cancer., Conclusion: Carriers of PPVs in LSD genes are at increased risk of cancer.

Purpose: Panel testing has led to the identification of TP53 pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant carriers (TP53+) who exhibit a broad range of phenotypes. We sought to evaluate and compare genotype-phenotype associations among TP53+ panel-ascertained subjects., Methods: Between 2012 and 2017, 317 TP53+ subjects (279 females and 38 males) identified through panel testing at one testing laboratory were found to have evaluable clinical histories and molecular results. Subject cancer histories were obtained from test requisition forms. P/LP variants were categorized by type and were examined in relation to phenotype., Results: Loss-of-function (LOF) variants were associated with the earliest age at first cancer, with a median age of 30.5 years (P = 0.014); increased frequency of a sarcoma diagnosis (P = 0.016); and more often meeting classic LFS testing and Chompret 2015 criteria (P = 0.004 and 0.002 respectively), as compared with dominant-negative missense, other missense, or miscellaneous (splice or in-frame deletion) P/LP variant categories., Conclusion: Loss-of-function variants were more often associated with characteristic LFS cancer histories than other variant categories in TP53+ carriers ascertained through multigene panel testing. These findings require validation in other TP53+ cohorts. Genetic counseling for panel-ascertained TP53+ individuals should reflect the dynamic expansion of the Li-Fraumeni syndrome phenotype.

Purpose: Some 10% of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and 80% of attenuated polyposis (AFAP) cases remain molecularly unexplained. We scrutinized such cases by exome-wide and targeted methods to search for novel susceptibility genes., Methods: Exome sequencing was conducted on 40 unexplained (mainly sporadic) cases with FAP or AFAP from Finland. The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene MLH3 (MutL Homolog 3) was pinpointed and prompted a subsequent screen of ~1000 Swedish patients referred to clinical panel sequencing for colon tumor susceptibility., Results: Three homozygous carriers of a truncating variant in MLH3, c.3563C>G, p.Ser1188Ter, were identified among the index cases from the Finnish series. An additional biallelic carrier of the same variant was present in the Swedish series. All four patients shared a 0.8-Mb core haplotype around MLH3, suggesting a founder variant. Colorectal polyps from variant carriers showed no instability at mono-, di-, tri-, or tetranucleotide repeats, in agreement with previous findings of a minor role of MLH3 in MMR. Multiple loci were affected by loss of heterozygosity, suggesting chromosomal instability., Conclusion: Our results show that a biallelic nonsense variant of MLH3 underlies a novel syndrome with susceptibility to classical or attenuated adenomatous polyposis and possibly extracolonic tumors, including breast cancer.

Purpose: To determine the role of mosaicism in the pathogenesis and inheritance of Rett and Rett-like disorders., Methods: We recruited 471 Rett and Rett-like patients. Panel-sequencing targeting MECP2, CDKL5, and FOXG1 was performed. Mosaicism was quantified in 147 patients by a Bayesian genotyper. Candidates were validated by amplicon sequencing and digital PCR. Germline mosaicism of 21 fathers with daughters carrying pathogenic MECP2 variants was further quantified., Results: Pathogenic variants of MECP2/CDKL5/FOXG1 were found in 324/471 (68.7%) patients. Somatic MECP2 mosaicism was confirmed in 5/471 (1.1%) patients, including 3/18 males (16.7%) and 2/453 females (0.4%). Three of the five patients with somatic MECP2 mosaicism had mosaicism at MECP2-Arg106. Germline MECP2 mosaicism was detected in 5/21 (23.8%) fathers., Conclusion: This is the first systematic screening of somatic and paternal germline MECP2 mosaicism at a cohort level. Our findings indicate that somatic MECP2 mosaicism contributes directly to the pathogenicity of Rett syndrome, especially in male patients. MECP2-Arg106 might be a mosaic hotspot. The high proportion of paternal germline MECP2 mosaicism indicates an underestimated mechanism underlying the paternal origin bias of MECP2 variants. Finally, this study provides an empirical foundation for future studies of genetic disorders caused by de novo variations of strong paternal origin.

Purpose: The identification of carriers of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) gene variants through family cancer history alone is suboptimal, and most population-based genetic testing studies have been limited to founder mutations in high-risk populations. Here, we determine the clinical utility of identifying actionable variants in a healthy cohort of women., Methods: Germline DNA from a subset of healthy Australian women participating in the lifepool project was screened using an 11-gene custom sequencing panel. Women with clinically actionable results were invited to attend a familial cancer clinic (FCC) for post-test genetic counseling and confirmatory testing. Outcomes measured included the prevalence of pathogenic variants, and the uptake rate of genetic counseling, risk reduction surgery, and cascade testing., Results: Thirty-eight of 5908 women (0.64%) carried a clinically actionable pathogenic variant. Forty-two percent of pathogenic variant carriers did not have a first-degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer and 89% pursued referral to an FCC. Forty-six percent (6/13) of eligible women pursued risk reduction surgery, and the uptake rate of cascade testing averaged 3.3 family members per index case., Conclusion: Within our cohort, HBOC genetic testing was well accepted, and the majority of high-risk gene carriers identified would not meet eligibility criteria for genetic testing based on their existing family history.

Purpose: Germline variants in double-strand DNA damage repair (dsDDR) genes (e.g., BRCA1/2) predispose to pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and may predict sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy and poly(ADP) ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. We sought to determine the prevalence and significance of germline cancer susceptibility gene variants in PDAC with paired somatic and survival analyses., Methods: Using a customized next-generation sequencing panel, germline/somatic DNA was analyzed from 289 patients with resected PDAC ascertained without preselection for high-risk features (e.g., young age, personal/family history). All identified variants were assessed for pathogenicity. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression., Results: We found that 28/289 (9.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.5-13.7%) patients carried pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants, including 21 (7.3%) dsDDR gene variants (3 BRCA1, 4 BRCA2, 14 other dsDDR genes [ATM, BRIP1, CHEK2, NBN, PALB2, RAD50, RAD51C]), 3 Lynch syndrome, and 4 other genes (APC p.I1307K, CDKN2A, TP53). Somatic sequencing and immunohistochemistry identified second hits in the tumor in 12/27 (44.4%) patients with germline variants (1 failed sequencing). Compared with noncarriers, patients with germline dsDDR gene variants had superior overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.54; 95% CI 0.30-0.99; P = 0.05)., Conclusion: Nearly 10% of PDAC patients harbor germline variants, although the majority lack somatic second hits, the therapeutic significance of which warrants further study.

Purpose: The high percentage of patients carrying germline mutations makes pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas the most heritable of all tumors. However, there are still cases unexplained by mutations in the known genes. We aimed to identify the genetic cause of disease in patients strongly suspected of having hereditary tumors., Methods: Whole-exome sequencing was applied to the germlines of a parent-proband trio. Genome-wide methylome analysis, RNA-seq, CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing, and targeted sequencing were also performed., Results: We identified a novel de novo germline mutation in DNMT3A, affecting a highly conserved residue located close to the aromatic cage that binds to trimethylated histone H3. DNMT3A-mutated tumors exhibited significant hypermethylation of homeobox-containing genes, suggesting an activating role of the mutation. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in in HeLa cells led to global changes in methylation, providing evidence of the DNMT3A-altered function. Targeted sequencing revealed subclonal somatic mutations in six additional paragangliomas. Finally, a second germline DNMT3A mutation, also causing global tumor DNA hypermethylation, was found in a patient with a family history of pheochromocytoma., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that DNMT3A may be a susceptibility gene for paragangliomas and, if confirmed in future studies, would represent the first example of gain-of-function mutations affecting a DNA methyltransferase gene involved in cancer predisposition.

Purpose: An association of Lynch syndrome (LS) with breast cancer has been long suspected; however, there have been insufficient data to address this question for each of the LS genes individually., Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of personal and family history in 423 women with pathogenic or likely pathogenic germ-line variants in MLH1 (N = 65), MSH2 (N = 94), MSH6 (N = 140), or PMS2 (N = 124) identified via clinical multigene hereditary cancer testing. Standard incidence ratios (SIRs) of breast cancer were calculated by comparing breast cancer frequencies in our study population with those in the general population (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 data)., Results: When evaluating by gene, the age-standardized breast cancer risks for MSH6 (SIR = 2.11; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.56-2.86) and PMS2 (SIR = 2.92; 95% CI, 2.17-3.92) were associated with a statistically significant risk for breast cancer whereas no association was observed for MLH1 (SIR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.42-1.83) or MSH2 (SIR = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.72-2.06)., Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that two LS genes, MSH6 and PMS2, are associated with an increased risk for breast cancer and should be considered when ordering genetic testing for individuals who have a personal and/or family history of breast cancer.

Purpose: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of BRCA testing in women with breast cancer, and cascade testing in family members of BRCA mutation carriers., Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using a cohort Markov model from a health-payer perspective. The model estimated the long-term benefits and costs of testing women with breast cancer who had at least a 10% pretest BRCA mutation probability, and the cascade testing of first- and second-degree relatives of women who test positive., Results: Compared with no testing, BRCA testing of affected women resulted in an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained of AU$18,900 (incremental cost AU$1,880; incremental QALY gain 0.10) with reductions of 0.04 breast and 0.01 ovarian cancer events. Testing affected women and cascade testing of family members resulted in an incremental cost per QALY gained of AU$9,500 compared with testing affected women only (incremental cost AU$665; incremental QALY gain 0.07) with additional reductions of 0.06 breast and 0.01 ovarian cancer events., Conclusion: BRCA testing in women with breast cancer is cost-effective and is associated with reduced risk of cancer and improved survival. Extending testing to cover family members of affected women who test positive improves cost-effectiveness beyond restricting testing to affected women only.

Background: Germ-line mutations in the exonuclease domains of the POLE and POLD1 genes are associated with an increased, but yet unquantified, risk of colorectal cancer (CRC)., Methods: We identified families with POLE or POLD1 variants by searching PubMed for relevant studies prior to October 2016 and by genotyping 669 population-based CRC cases diagnosed in patients under 60 years of age, from the Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry. We estimated the age-specific cumulative risks (penetrance) using a modified segregation analysis., Results: We observed 67 CRCs (mean age at diagnosis = 50.2 (SD = 13.8) years) among 364 first- and second-degree relatives from 41 POLE families, and 6 CRCs (mean age at diagnosis = 39.7 (SD = 6.83) years) among 69 relatives from 9 POLD1 families. We estimated risks of CRC up to the age of 70 years (95% confidence interval) for males and females, respectively, to be 28% (95% CI, 10–42%) and 21% (95% CI, 7–33%) for POLE mutation carriers and 90% (95% CI, 33–99%) and 82% (95% CI, 26–99%) for POLD1 mutation carriers., Conclusion: CRC risks for POLE mutation carriers are sufficiently high to warrant consideration of colonoscopy screening and implementation of management guidelines recommended for MSH6 mutation carriers in cases of Lynch syndrome. Refinement of estimates of CRC risk for POLD1 carriers is needed; however, clinical management recommendations could follow those made for POLE carriers.

Purpose: Implementing cancer precision medicine in the clinic requires assessing the therapeutic relevance of genomic alterations. A main challenge is the systematic interpretation of whole-exome sequencing (WES) data for clinical care., Methods: One hundred sixty-five adults with metastatic colorectal and lung adenocarcinomas were prospectively enrolled in the CanSeq study. WES was performed on DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor biopsy samples and matched blood samples. Somatic and germ-line alterations were ranked according to therapeutic or clinical relevance. Results were interpreted using an integrated somatic and germ-line framework and returned in accordance with patient preferences., Results: At the time of this analysis, WES had been performed and results returned to the clinical team for 165 participants. Of 768 curated somatic alterations, only 31% were associated with clinical evidence and 69% with preclinical or inferential evidence. Of 806 curated germ-line variants, 5% were clinically relevant and 56% were classified as variants of unknown significance. The variant review and decision-making processes were effective when the process was changed from that of a Molecular Tumor Board to a protocol-based approach., Conclusion: The development of novel interpretive and decision-support tools that draw from scientific and clinical evidence will be crucial for the success of cancer precision medicine in WES studies.Genet Med advance online publication 26 January 2017.

Purpose: Although targeted sequencing improves outcomes for many cancer patients, it remains uncertain how somatic and germ-line whole-exome sequencing (WES) will integrate into care., Methods: We conducted surveys and interviews within a study of WES integration at an academic center to determine oncologists' attitudes about WES and to identify lung and colorectal cancer patients' preferences for learning WES findings., Results: One-hundred sixty-seven patients (85% white, 58% female, mean age 60) and 27 oncologists (22% female) participated. Although oncologists had extensive experience ordering somatic tests (median 100/year), they had little experience ordering germ-line tests. Oncologists intended to disclose most WES results to patients but anticipated numerous challenges in using WES. Patients had moderately low levels of genetic knowledge (mean 4 correct out of 7). Most patients chose to learn results that could help select a clinical trial, pharmacogenetic and positive prognostic results, and results suggesting inherited predisposition to cancer and treatable noncancer conditions (all ≥95%). Fewer chose to receive negative prognostic results (84%) and results suggesting predisposition to untreatable noncancer conditions (85%)., Conclusion: The majority of patients want most cancer-related and incidental WES results. Patients' low levels of genetic knowledge and oncologists' inexperience with large-scale sequencing present challenges to implementing paired WES in practice.Genet Med 18 10, 1011-1019.

Purpose: To develop and validate VisCap, a software program targeted to clinical laboratories for inference and visualization of germ-line copy-number variants (CNVs) from targeted next-generation sequencing data., Methods: VisCap calculates the fraction of overall sequence coverage assigned to genomic intervals and computes log2 ratios of these values to the median of reference samples profiled using the same test configuration. Candidate CNVs are called when log2 ratios exceed user-defined thresholds., Results: We optimized VisCap using 14 cases with known CNVs, followed by prospective analysis of 1,104 cases referred for diagnostic DNA sequencing. To verify calls in the prospective cohort, we used droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to confirm 10/27 candidate CNVs and 72/72 copy-neutral genomic regions scored by VisCap. We also used a genome-wide bead array to confirm the absence of CNV calls across panels applied to 10 cases. To improve specificity, we instituted a visual scoring system that enabled experienced reviewers to differentiate true-positive from false-positive calls with minimal impact on laboratory workflow., Conclusions: VisCap is a sensitive method for inferring CNVs from targeted sequence data from targeted gene panels. Visual scoring of data underlying CNV calls is a critical step to reduce false-positive calls for follow-up testing.Genet Med 18 7, 712-719.Genetics in Medicine (2016); 18 7, 712-719. doi:10.1038/gim.2015.156.