Search

Reproducible research becomes even more imperative as we build the evidence base on SARS‐CoV‐2 epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. In his study, Paez assessed the reproducibility of COVID‐19 research during the pandemic, using a case study of population density. He found that most articles that assess the relationship of population density and COVID‐19 outcomes do not publicly share data and code, except for a few, including our paper, which he stated "illustrates the importance of good reproducibility practices". Paez recreated our analysis using our code and data from the perspective of spatial analysis, and his new model came to a different conclusion. The disparity between our and Paez's findings, as well as other existing literature on the topic, give greater impetus to the need for further research. As there has been near exponential growth of COVID‐19 research across a wide range of scientific disciplines, reproducible science is a vital component to produce reliable, rigorous, and robust evidence on COVID‐19, which will be essential to inform clinical practice and policy in order to effectively eliminate the pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]