Search

We developed the WRF-GC model, an online coupling of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) mesoscale meteorological model and the GEOS-Chem atmospheric chemistry model, for regional atmospheric chemistry and air quality modeling. Both WRF and GEOS-Chem are open-source and community-supported. WRF-GC provides regional chemistry modellers easy access to the GEOS-Chem chemical module, which is stably-configured, state-of-the-science, well-documented, traceable, benchmarked, actively developed by a large international user base, and centrally managed by a dedicated support team. At the same time, WRF-GC gives GEOS-Chem users the ability to perform high-resolution forecasts and hindcasts for any location and time of interest. WRF-GC is designed to be easy to use, massively parallel, extendable, and easy to update. The WRF-GC coupling structure allows future versions of either one of the two parent models to be immediately integrated into WRF-GC. This enables WRF-GC to stay state-of-the-science with traceability to parent model versions. Physical and chemical state variables in WRF and in GEOS-Chem are managed in distributed memory and translated between the two models by the WRF-GC Coupler at runtime. We used the WRF-GC model to simulate surface PM2.5 concentrations over China during January 22 to 27, 2015 and compared the results to surface observations and the outcomes from a GEOS-Chem nested-grid simulation. Both models were able to reproduce the observed spatiotemporal variations of regional PM2.5, but the WRF-GC model (r = 0.68, bias = 29%) reproduced the observed daily PM2.5 concentrations over Eastern China better than the GEOS-Chem model did (r = 0.72, bias = 55%). This was mainly because our WRF-GC simulation, nudged with surface and upper-level meteorological observations, was able to better represent the spatiotemporal variability of the planetary boundary layer heights over China during the simulation period. Both parent models and the WRF-GC Coupler are parallelized across computational cores and can scale to massively parallel architectures. The WRF-GC simulation was three times more efficient than the GEOS-Chem nested-grid simulation at similar resolutions and for the same number of computational cores, owing to the more efficient transport algorithm and the MPI-based parallelization provided by the WRF software framework. WRF-GC scales nearly perfectly up to a few hundred cores on a variety of computational platforms. Version 1.0 of the WRF-GC model supports one-way coupling only, using WRF-simulated meteorological fields to drive GEOS-Chem with no feedbacks from GEOS-Chem. The development of two-way coupling capabilities, i.e., the ability to simulate radiative and microphysical feedbacks of chemistry to meteorology, is under-way. The WRF-GC model is open-source and freely available from http://wrf.geos-chem.org. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The meteorological input parameters for urban and local scale dispersion models can be evaluated by pre-processing meteorological observations, using a boundary-layer parametrization model. This study presents a sensitivity analysis of a meteorological pre-processor model (MPP-FMI) that utilises readily available meteorological data as input. The sensitivity of the pre-processor to meteorological input was analysed using algorithmic differentiation (AD). The AD tool used was TAPENADE. The AD method numerically evaluates the partial derivatives of functions that are implemented in a computer program. In this study, we focus on the evaluation of vertical fluxes in the atmosphere, and in particular on the sensitivity of the predicted inverse Obukhov length and friction velocity on the model input parameters. The study shows that the estimated inverse Obukhov length and friction velocity are most sensitive to wind speed, and second most sensitive to solar irradiation. The dependency on wind speed is most pronounced at low wind speeds. The presented results have implications for improving the meteorological pre-processing models. AD is shown to be an efficient tool for studying the ranges of sensitivities of the predicted parameters on the model input values quantitatively. A wider use of such advanced sensitivity analysis methods could potentially be very useful in analysing and improving the models used in atmospheric sciences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]