Search

The Open Window Thoracostomy (OWT) surgical method find its origin in the treatment of chronic tuberculous empyemas, in the cases where the drainage alone not permitted a sufficient cleaning of pleural cavity. In the recent years the indications for the execution of this method are extended also to metapneumoniae and post-pneumonectomy empyemas (for benign and malignant pathology), with or without bronco-pleural fistula, when these pathologies produces a general severe decline in the patient (septic shock). This method permit to effect a daily cleaning of a pleural cavity, through the introduction of a sterile gauzes imbued of specific antibiotic, reducing at least the purulent infection effects's previously present and favouring the reduction of the same cavity, in prevision of other reconstructive operations (thoracoplasty). Generally not many beloved by surgeons and patients (for the difficult management, aesthetic outcomes, the long stay in hospital), the OWT can often reestablish a dangerous situation, especially in the patients with a risk of septic shock. This study aims to analyse present indications, problems and therapeutics outcomes of this method, through the evaluation of 27 cases of OWT treated in the Department of Thoracic Surgery University of L'Aquila between the 1984 and the 1998.

The Authors carried out an retrospective analysis on 81 patients, 67 men and 14 women, suffering from non post-surgical thoracic empyema, to evaluate the different therapeutic procedures and respective indications. The unsuccessful response to the preserving approach (intercostal drainage and pleural lavage twice a day with specific antibiotics or antiseptics) in 56 cases, induced the Authors to carry out a video-thoracoscopy (VAT), that allowed them to define the infection stage and subsequent treatment (the carrying on of a pleural drainage-lavage in 32 cases, the transcurrent pleural irrigation in 10 cases, the open window thoracostomy followed by myoplasty in 6 cases with bronchopleural fistula, the decortication with associated pleural exeresis in 6 cases with bronchopleural fistula, the decortication with associated pleural exeresis in 6 cases, the streptokinase in pleural cavity in 2 cases). There were registered totally 3 deaths (3.7%). The Authors in conclusion assert that the VAT, carried out after the unsuccessful preserving treatment, allows the evaluation of the infection stage and consequently suggests therapy.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the utility of surgical treatment in patients with pectus excavatum (PE) or pectus carinatum (PC). Fifteen patients underwent surgical treatment because of their psycological and anatomical condition, more serious in 6 patients (5 with PE and 1 with PC). The degree of these chest wall deformities was evaluated as resulting from CT scan of the thorax, by the ratio between the transversal and the front/back diameters, according to Haller. The Authors recommend surgical operation in the post-puberal age up to 21 years because of good results obtained using Ravitch approach (only 1 case of partial relapse of PE), even though modified in PE cases with the application of flat steel prosthesis and in PC cases for uncutting the perichondral beds. The choice of surgical procedure derives, in our opinion, from the correction of these anatomic deformities and from the greater sense of improved cosmesis that might result.