The confrontation with the changes brought about by corona is an omnipresent topic, it permeates everyday life and affects us personally and professionally on many levels. On this occasion, we are looking at the past corona year from three perspectives in a collegial exchange and using single aspects to shed light on the relevance for the current and future situation of medical university libraries. As staff in medical libraries, we have not been and will not be affected existentially by the restrictions associated with the lockdowns, and yet we are in a special situation. Our customers are often the “heroes” of the pandemic or are at least on the way to becoming so through their studies or training. Our main user groups – scientists, doctors, nurses, students – could only make limited use of our services and our media offerings and this in a situation in which the importance of their work became particularly clear to the rest of us. Against this background, the discussion around the opening of medical libraries has been and continues to be, in part, emotionally motivated. And the discrepancy between what seemed reasonable with regard to the pandemic situation and what was considered necessary with regard to the important role of libraries in educating medical professionals could not always be resolved to everyone’s satisfaction. In light of this, reflecting on one year of corona from the viewpoint of medical libraries appears to hold merit. Highlighting the significance of academic libraries, especially in the context of university medicine, may lead to new insights applicable in the implementation of future strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]