Search

The use of ultrasonography (US) has considerable potential for the diagnosis and monitoring of gout due to its capacity to detect monosodium urate deposits. In the last decade, a critical amount of scientific data has become available. Consensus-based definitions for ultrasonographic elementary lesions in gout have been developed, tested, and validated, as well as a semiquantitative scoring system for their quantification. Many scanning protocols have been proposed in different clinical scenarios. In this review, we formulate a set of practical suggestions for the use of the US in daily practice. We discuss the current knowledge to indicate which joints and structures are to be scanned and which elementary findings are to be evaluated according to the clinical scenario. While for some clinical settings, a quite definite scanning protocol can be indicated, others still need to be further investigated, and how to obtain the best out of the US is still entrusted to the individual experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ultrasound is a pivotal exam in calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) identification. It has been demonstrated to be feasible, accurate, and reliable for CPPD diagnosis. Even if standardized definitions and a scoring system for CPPD have been established by the OMERACT ultrasound working group, ultrasound is still considered one of the most operator-dependent techniques. This is because in ultrasound, both the acquisition and the interpretation phases of the diagnostic process are in the hands of one operator and are performed simultaneously, in contrast to what happens with other imaging exams, where the acquisition process is standardized and independent from the interpretation process. Therefore, the scanning technique and machine setting acquire a central role, almost as important as the interpretation of the images, as erroneous scanning may lead to interpretative mistakes. In this review, we will delve into the appearance of CPPD on ultrasound, based on the latest research findings, passing through its pathogenesis, and focusing on machine settings and ultrasound scanning techniques, providing some tips and tricks to facilitate accurate CPPD recognition in the most frequently affected sites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]