Search

Droughts in southern South America affect grazing systems in many ways. They reduce biomass productivity; decrease livestock feed intake, weight and reproductive performance; increase farmers' costs; and reduce farm income. It was hypothesized that simple grazing management variables affect the resilience of grazing systems to droughts at the paddock and farm scales. The effects of grazing management on herbage and animal production were assessed at paddock level, and how technological and structural variables relate to the production and economic performances at farm level. Results of a grazing experiment controlling herbage allowance at paddock level showed that resistance of herbage accumulation and animal live weight to drought was significantly higher for paddocks with higher pre-drought herbage allowance than for those managed to low herbage allowance treatments. A strong positive linear relationship was found between pre-drought herbage height and resistance of herbage accumulation rate (p < .01). In a longitudinal study of nine farms in Uruguay, resistance of cow pregnancy rate to drought was positively correlated with cow pregnancy rate (r = .72, p = .02) and farm net income (r = .78, p = .02), and negatively correlated with sheep-to-cattle ratio (r = −.80, p = .01). These correlations suggest that farms with higher incomes and low proportions of sheep in the herd withstand drought better (in terms of pregnancy rate). Four common regional production strategies were identified that react differently when farmers face drought, and these results can aid farmers in those regions to design more resilient mixed livestock farming systems and can inform policymakers about effective strategies for mitigating drought impacts in the region.

Two experiments were conducted to examine the ‘long-term’ effect of feed space allowance and period of access to feed on dairy cow performance. In Experiment 1, three horizontal feed space allowances (20, 40 and 60 cm cow−1) were examined over a 127-d period (14 cows per treatment). In Experiment 2, 48 dairy cows were used in a continuous design (10-week duration) 2 × 2 factorial design experiment comprising two horizontal feed space allowances (15 and 40 cm cow−1), and two periods of access to feed (unrestricted and restricted). With the former, uneaten feed was removed at 08·00 h, while feeding took place at 09·00 h. With the latter, uneaten feed was removed at 06·00 h, while feeding was delayed until 12·00 h. Mean total dry-matter (DM) intakes were 19·0, 18·7 and 19·3 kg cow−1 d−1 with the 20, 40 and 60 cm cow−1 treatments in Experiment 1, and 18·1 and 18·2 kg cow−1 d−1 with the ‘restricted feeding time’ treatments, and 17·8 and 18·1 kg d−1 with the ‘unrestricted feeding time’ treatments (15 and 40 cm respectively) in Experiment 2. None of milk yield, milk composition, or end-of-study live weight or condition score were significantly affected by treatment in either experiment (P > 0·05), while fat + protein yield was reduced with the 15-cm treatment in Experiment 2 (P

The effects of allowance of extended (deferred) grazed herbage (AEGH) and herbage allocation management (HAM) were studied in ewe lambs (248) and late-gestation ewes (152), respectively, on commercial farms in south-east Ireland in 2005–06. In Experiment 1, which consisted of four treatments, the effects of AEGH (0·75, 1·25 and 1·75 kg DM per head daily) and concentrate supplementation (0·5 kg per head daily with the 0·75 kg DM herbage allowance) on lamb performance during the extended grazing (16 December to 3 March) and subsequent grazing (4 March to 11 August) seasons were evaluated. Increasing AEGH increased herbage intake linearly (P 0·05) subsequent lamb birth or weaning weights. It is concluded that increasing AEGH to ewe lambs increased liveweight gain during extended grazing and resulted in heavier animals in mid August of the subsequent grazing season. For ewe lambs each 1 kg concentrate DM had the same feed value as 2·4 kg DM AEGH. Use of a leader–follower system for ewes in late pregnancy did not alter lamb birth weight or subsequent performance.

This study investigated the effects of levels of supplementation with maize grain and herbage allowance (HA) on grass herbage and maize intake, animal performance and grazing behaviour in two replicated grazing experiments with Angus beef cattle in Argentina. In Experiment 1, the response to increasing HA (2·5, 5·0 and 7·5 kg DM herbage 100 kg−1 live weight (LW) d−1 with and without 0·5 kg DM maize grain 100 kg−1 LW d−1) was investigated. In Experiment 2, the responses to level of maize grain offered (0, 0·5 and 1·0 kg DM maize grain 100 kg−1 LW d−1) at an HA of 2·5 kg DM herbage 100 kg−1 LW d−1 and an HA of 5·0 kg 100 kg−1 LW d−1 without maize grain were assessed. In Experiment 2, soyabean meal was added to control the crude protein concentration in the diet. Two methods were used for intake estimations: pre- and post-feeding herbage mass difference, and the use of the n-alkane and 13C technique. The latter predicted most accurately the metabolizable energy requirements calculated from live weights and liveweight gain of beef cattle attained in each treatment in both experiments. Increasing HA significantly increased herbage intake and liveweight gain (P

Herbage allowance is one of the important pasture factors in the determination of intake by grazing livestock. Ingestive behaviour of 12 adult Angus cows (Bos taurus) was measured over a range of allowances (0·25 to 0·72 kg dry matter (DM) per 100 kg live weight (LW) for a 1-h period) of vegetative tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.). A balanced change-over design was used to estimate direct, residual and permanent effects of herbage allowance on rate of DM intake, rate of biting and herbage DM intake per bite. In Experiment 1, herbage DM intake per meal increased linearly from 0·68 to 1·72 kg (100 kg LW)−1 as DM allowance increased from 0·25 to 0·72 kg (100 kg LW)−1 h−1. Cows grazed at ·30 kg (100 kg LW)−1 h−1 and stopped grazing when the sward was reduced to a height about 10 to 12 cm above the soil surface, approximately defined by the tops of pseudostems. In Experiment 2, herbage DM intake rates of 0·29, 0·47 and 0·42 kg (100 kg LW)−1 h−1 were recorded as cows grazed allowances of 0·43, 0·70 and 0·90 kg (100 kg LW)−1 h−1 for most of the 1-h grazing period. Limiting herbage DM allowances in Experiment 2 were associated with small reductions in rate of biting and herbage DM intake per bite as allowance declined. Sward DM density (>5 cm) was an important variable in the determination of herbage DM intake rates at lower herbage allowances.

An experiment was conducted to examine the effect of concentrate supplementation on the performance of suckling lambs while grazing at variable levels of herbage allowance. Twenty-four ewes suckling twin lambs were allocated 55 d after lambing between four grazing treatments (two levels of herbage allowance × two levels of supplementation) in a 2×2 factorial design. The sward consisted of Tall Fescue and was grazed rotationally. Daily herbage organic matter (OM) allowances were 57.0 (H) and 38.5 (L) g OM kg LW−1 above 1·5 cm cutting height. Lambs were either supplemented (S) ad libitum with high-moisture whole maize grain or unsupplemented (U). Supplement intake during the 60-d grazing period was 16 kg DM and 17.5 kg DM respectively for LS and HS lambs. The effect of supplementation on lamb growth rate differed significantly between allowances: at the low allowance level, supplementation increased growth rate (287 g d−1 vs 226 g d−1), whereas it had no effect at the high level (277 g d−1 vs 276 g d−1). Growth rate of unsupplemented lambs was significantly reduced at the low level of allowance compared to the high level (226 g d−1 vs 276 g d−1). The effect of sward height on time spent grazing by unsupplemented lambs is described during the defoliation of a plot.

Two experiments are described in which two levels of winter feeding and three levels of herbage allowance during the grazing season were imposed upon March/April calving British Friesian dairy cows. The winter treatments resulted in differences in live weight and milk yield at turnout of 35 and 53 kg and 3·4 and 3·2 kg d-1 for the two trials. Subsequently, when grazed at generous herbage allowances, the cows were able to compensate for much of this difference but when herbage was restricted the milk yield differences were accentuated. Groups of cows from each winter treatment were offered 25, 50 or 75 (Experiment 1) and 30, 50 or 70 (Experiment 2) g herbage DM per kg LW daily during the grazing season. Daily herbage intakes on the three allowances in each trial were 14·1, 13·3, 10·7 and 12·5, 12·1, 11·5 kg OM and milk yields were 16·0, 15·3, 12·5 and 15·2, 14·3, 11·8 kg SCM respectively. Both intake and milk production were depressed once the cows were forced to consume more than 50% of herbage on offer or to graze the sward down to a mean height of less than 8–10 cm. Grazing behaviour observations indicated that under rotational managements the cows did not compensate for restrictions in available herbage by grazing longer. Highest levels of milk production per unit area were observed in both trials when production per cow was depressed by 20–25%.

Measurements of herbage intake and ingestive behaviour were made on British Friesian calves 4–9 months old, which were strip-grazed on swards of S24 perennial ryegrass at three (Experiment A) or four (Experiment B) levels of daily herbage allowance in three (A) or four (B) 12-d periods. Herbage intake declined by approx. 18% as daily herbage allowance was reduced from 90 to 30 g DM per kg LW in both experiments, but the relationship between intake and allowance was not consistent between periods. Bite size and rate of biting were greater in calves on low than on high allowances after entry to a new strip of herbage but the positions were reversed towards the end of grazing. Reduced herbage intakes at low allowance resulted from reductions of approx. equal magnitude in bite size, rate of biting and grazing time, though not all of these effects were significant. It is suggested that these responses result from the increasing difficulty of prehending and ingesting herbage as swards are grazed down. The calves at low herbage allowances did not increase grazing time, probably because their behaviour was conditioned by anticipation of a new allowance of herbage. Bite size and daily herbage intake were greater on a spring sward than on an autumn sward, but within experiments herbage intake was not consistently related to any of the sward characteristics measured.

Two experiments in which early-weaned lambs (4–7 and 5–9 weeks of age) continuously grazed a perennial ryegrass-white clover sward are described. In both experiments groups of lambs were offered a proprietary concentrate ad libitum, 2/3 or 1/3 of ad libitum allowance, or no concentrate. Mean daily gains over 56 days in Experiment 1 increased from 88 g without concentrate to 275 g with ad libitum concentrate allowance; the range in daily gains over 71 days in Experiment 2 was 201 g to 253 g respectively. In both experiments mean faecal OM output from herbage decreased as concentrate OM intake increased.

Twenty-four British Friesian cows were allocated between six grazing treatments (two levels of herbage mass x three levels of daily herbage allowance) in a balanced change-over design with four periods of 12 d each at monthly intervals. Herbage OM mass ranged from 3790 to 5770 kg ha-1 measured to ground level and daily herbage DM allowances were 30, 60 and 90 g per kg animal live weight. Herbage OM intake was lower at high than at low herbage mass (24·6 vs 26·3 g per kg LW), and was 26·9, 26·6 and 22·9 g per kg LW respectively at daily herbage DM allowances of 90, 60 and 30 g per kg LW. Milk yield was not affected by herbage mass but was depressed at the low herbage allowance.

Information about the grazing behaviour and the return of dung to pasture by lactating dairy cows was collected from stocking rate experiments in northern Victoria. Grazing behaviour was observed for 24-h periods in mid-summer in two years. Grazing time increased as herbage allowance decreased to about 32 kg DM cow−1 d−1 but as herbage allowance decreased further grazing time also decreased. A herbage allowance of 32 kg DM cow−1 d−1 corresponded to a stocking rate of about 5.5 cows ha−1. This effect of herbage allowance on grazing time may have been confounded by herbage mass, however. Rumination time of the cows increased by 003 h for each kg increase in herbage allowance while resting time was not affected by treatment. The effects of stocking rate on some of the characteristics of faecal output were measured for a 3-d period in mid-summer. The number of pats deposited per cow daily declined by 0.66 for each unit increase in stocking rate. The fresh weight of dung also declined as stocking rate increased by 0.16 kg per unit of stocking rate. While the values for the amounts of dung deposited on the pasture by the cows at the lower stocking rates are similar to many of those reported in the literature, this study has quantified the way in which stocking rate may influence this in one instance. Furthermore, provided that some measure of herbage intake is made when measurements of dung excretion are performed, it is suggested that estimates of in vivo digestibility can be obtained.

Twenty-four Hereford × Friesian cows and their South Devon cross calves were allocated to three herbage allowances allotted daily for three periods of 8 weeks in a Latin square design. The daily allowances were 17, 34 and 51 g dry matter per kg cow plus calf live weight. Milk production was depressed by 0·2 and 1·2 kg d-1 at the medium and low allowances. The corresponding falls in liveweight gain were for cows 0·26 and 0·25, and for calves 0·27 and 0·24 kg d-1. Residual sward height after grazing gave a better indication of the animals' reaction to sward conditions and the management imposed than actual herbage allowance. The quantity per unit area and the composition of material present were important factors influencing intake. Calves were unable to compete with their dams to maintain herbage intake at the lower allowances and therefore are likely to benefit from additional feeding or creep grazing when residual sward height falls below 6cm for periods in excess of 1–2 weeks.

Two experiments are described in which twenty-four spring-calving Dutch Friesian cows were allocated between six grazing treatments (two levels of daily herbage allowance × three levels of daily concentrate intake) in a 2 × 3 factorial design. The swards consisted predominantly of perennial ryegrass. A two-machine sward-cutting technique (with correction for herbage accumulation during grazing) was used for estimating herbage intake by cows which grazed swards for 3 or 4d. Experiment 1 was carried out for 16 weeks of the grazing season of 1981 and experiment 2 for 18 weeks in 1982. Daily herbage OM allowances in both experiments were 16 and 24 kg per cow above 4 cm cutting height. Daily concentrate OM intake ranged from 0.8 to 5.6 kg per cow. The effect of concentrates on herbage intake differed significantly between allowances. At the low allowance level and at daily concentrate OM intakes of 0.8, 3.2 and 5.6 kg per cow daily herbage OM intake was 10.9, 10.6 and 10.4 kg per cow respectively and the mean substitution rate of herbage by concentrates was only 0.1. At the high allowance level and at daily concentrate OM intakes of 0.8, 3.2 and 5.6 kg per cow daily herbage OM intake was 14.8, 13.6 and 12.4 kg per cow respectively and mean substitution rate was 0.5 kg herbage OM (kg concentrate OM)−1.

The effect of herbage allowance on the herbage intake and performance of ewes and their twin lambs at pasture was investigated. Daily herbage allowances of 40,80.120 and 160 g organic matter (OM) kg-1 ewe live weight, based on herbage mass measured to ground level, were offered during the first 12 weeks of lactation. The sheep were grazed rotationally around four paddocks of a perennial ryegrass pasture for 7-day periods and herbage mass, extended tiller length and digestibility of the herbage consumed by the animals were estimated. Herbage intake by the ewes was estimated during weeks two to twelve and live weights were recorded weekly: during the last two weeks of the experiment grazing behaviour of one ewe on each treatment was recorded continuously. Herbage intakes by the ewes (164, 1–81, 2–42 and 268 ± 0153 kg d-1) and live weight gains of the lambs (202, 245, 274 and 300 ± 7–3 g d-1) increased with increasing herbage allowances. Herbage intakes by the ewes and growth rates of their lambs increased up to a herbage allowance which was over five times the amount of herbage eaten by the ewes. As the animals reduced herbage mass and sward height, biting rates by the ewes during grazing increased by 4 (± 0·08) bites min-1 cm-1 and masticating rates decreased. Mastications reached a maximum of 90 (± 3·5) min-1 at a sward surface height of 9 cm.

An experiment examining the relationship of daily herbage disappearance (DHD) and daily herbage allowance (DHA) is described. Cows with calves were grazed at three stocking rates on Kleingrass and Coastal Bermudagrass pastures. DHD and DHA were monitored at 14-d intervals. A significant positive linear relationship was noted between DHD and DHA (P0·25). Equations derived for Coastal Bermudagrass and Kleingrass were not significantly different and resulted in a combined equation Ŷ= 0·275X + 0·209 with an r2 vaiue of 0·27. As DHA exceeded 6–9 kg DM per 100 kg live weight, efficiency of defoliation by the cows and calves declined.