10 results on '"Hoffmeister, M"'
Search Results
2. Cumulative impact of common genetic variants and other risk factors on colorectal cancer risk in 42\u2008103 individuals
- Author
-
Dunlop MG, Tenesa A, Farrington SM, Ballereau S, Brewster DH, Kossler T, Pharoah P, Schafmayer C, Hampe J, Vxf6lzke H, Chang-Claude J, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H, von Holst S, Picelli S, Lindblom A, Jenkins MA, Hopper JL, Casey G, Duggan D, Newcomb PA, Abulıxb4 A, Bessa X, Ruiz-Ponte C, Castellvıxb4-Bel S, Niittymxe4ki I, Tuupanen S, Karhu A, Aaltonen L, Zanke B, Hudson T, Gallinger S, Barclay E, Martin L, Gorman M, Carvajal-Carmona L, Walther A, Kerr D, Lubbe S, Broderick P, Chandler I, Pittman A, Penegar S, and Campbel
- Published
- 2012
3. Risk of progression of advanced adenomas to colorectal cancer by age and sex: estimates based on 840 149 screening colonoscopies
- Author
-
Brenner, H., primary, Hoffmeister, M., additional, Stegmaier, C., additional, Brenner, G., additional, Altenhofen, L., additional, and Haug, U., additional
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Significant underestimation of preventive effects in colorectal cancer screening trial.
- Author
-
Heisser T, Hoffmeister M, and Brenner H
- Subjects
- Humans, Colonoscopy, Sigmoidoscopy, Mass Screening, Early Detection of Cancer, Colorectal Neoplasms diagnosis, Colorectal Neoplasms prevention & control
- Abstract
Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Genetic architectures of proximal and distal colorectal cancer are partly distinct.
- Author
-
Huyghe JR, Harrison TA, Bien SA, Hampel H, Figueiredo JC, Schmit SL, Conti DV, Chen S, Qu C, Lin Y, Barfield R, Baron JA, Cross AJ, Diergaarde B, Duggan D, Harlid S, Imaz L, Kang HM, Levine DM, Perduca V, Perez-Cornago A, Sakoda LC, Schumacher FR, Slattery ML, Toland AE, van Duijnhoven FJB, Van Guelpen B, Agudo A, Albanes D, Alonso MH, Anderson K, Arnau-Collell C, Arndt V, Banbury BL, Bassik MC, Berndt SI, Bézieau S, Bishop DT, Boehm J, Boeing H, Boutron-Ruault MC, Brenner H, Brezina S, Buch S, Buchanan DD, Burnett-Hartman A, Caan BJ, Campbell PT, Carr PR, Castells A, Castellví-Bel S, Chan AT, Chang-Claude J, Chanock SJ, Curtis KR, de la Chapelle A, Easton DF, English DR, Feskens EJM, Gala M, Gallinger SJ, Gauderman WJ, Giles GG, Goodman PJ, Grady WM, Grove JS, Gsur A, Gunter MJ, Haile RW, Hampe J, Hoffmeister M, Hopper JL, Hsu WL, Huang WY, Hudson TJ, Jenab M, Jenkins MA, Joshi AD, Keku TO, Kooperberg C, Kühn T, Küry S, Le Marchand L, Lejbkowicz F, Li CI, Li L, Lieb W, Lindblom A, Lindor NM, Männistö S, Markowitz SD, Milne RL, Moreno L, Murphy N, Nassir R, Offit K, Ogino S, Panico S, Parfrey PS, Pearlman R, Pharoah PDP, Phipps AI, Platz EA, Potter JD, Prentice RL, Qi L, Raskin L, Rennert G, Rennert HS, Riboli E, Schafmayer C, Schoen RE, Seminara D, Song M, Su YR, Tangen CM, Thibodeau SN, Thomas DC, Trichopoulou A, Ulrich CM, Visvanathan K, Vodicka P, Vodickova L, Vymetalkova V, Weigl K, Weinstein SJ, White E, Wolk A, Woods MO, Wu AH, Abecasis GR, Nickerson DA, Scacheri PC, Kundaje A, Casey G, Gruber SB, Hsu L, Moreno V, Hayes RB, Newcomb PA, and Peters U
- Subjects
- Adult, Age Distribution, Age of Onset, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alleles, Case-Control Studies, Cecum, Colon, Ascending, Colon, Descending, Colon, Sigmoid, Colon, Transverse, Colonic Neoplasms diagnosis, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Rectal Neoplasms diagnosis, Risk Factors, White People genetics, Young Adult, Colon, Colonic Neoplasms genetics, Genetic Heterogeneity, Rectal Neoplasms genetics
- Abstract
Objective: An understanding of the etiologic heterogeneity of colorectal cancer (CRC) is critical for improving precision prevention, including individualized screening recommendations and the discovery of novel drug targets and repurposable drug candidates for chemoprevention. Known differences in molecular characteristics and environmental risk factors among tumors arising in different locations of the colorectum suggest partly distinct mechanisms of carcinogenesis. The extent to which the contribution of inherited genetic risk factors for CRC differs by anatomical subsite of the primary tumor has not been examined., Design: To identify new anatomical subsite-specific risk loci, we performed genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analyses including data of 48 214 CRC cases and 64 159 controls of European ancestry. We characterised effect heterogeneity at CRC risk loci using multinomial modelling., Results: We identified 13 loci that reached genome-wide significance (p<5×10
-8 ) and that were not reported by previous GWASs for overall CRC risk. Multiple lines of evidence support candidate genes at several of these loci. We detected substantial heterogeneity between anatomical subsites. Just over half (61) of 109 known and new risk variants showed no evidence for heterogeneity. In contrast, 22 variants showed association with distal CRC (including rectal cancer), but no evidence for association or an attenuated association with proximal CRC. For two loci, there was strong evidence for effects confined to proximal colon cancer., Conclusion: Genetic architectures of proximal and distal CRC are partly distinct. Studies of risk factors and mechanisms of carcinogenesis, and precision prevention strategies should take into consideration the anatomical subsite of the tumour., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis reveals a prognostic classifier for non-metastatic colorectal cancer (ProMCol classifier).
- Author
-
Gündert M, Edelmann D, Benner A, Jansen L, Jia M, Walter V, Knebel P, Herpel E, Chang-Claude J, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H, and Burwinkel B
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Case-Control Studies, Colorectal Neoplasms pathology, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Genes, Neoplasm genetics, Germany, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Principal Component Analysis, Prognosis, Risk Assessment, Survival Rate, Colorectal Neoplasms genetics, CpG Islands genetics, DNA Methylation, Genome-Wide Association Study
- Abstract
Objective: Pathological staging used for the prediction of patient survival in colorectal cancer (CRC) provides only limited information., Design: Here, a genome-wide study of DNA methylation was conducted for two cohorts of patients with non-metastatic CRC (screening cohort (n=572) and validation cohort (n=274)). A variable screening for prognostic CpG sites was performed in the screening cohort using marginal testing based on a Cox model and subsequent adjustment of the p-values via independent hypothesis weighting using the methylation difference between 34 pairs of tumour and normal mucosa tissue as auxiliary covariate. From the 1000 CpG sites with the smallest adjusted p-value, 20 CpG sites with the smallest Brier score for overall survival (OS) were selected. Applying principal component analysis, we derived a prognostic methylation-based classifier for patients with non-metastatic CRC (ProMCol classifier)., Results: This classifier was associated with OS in the screening (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.63, p=6.2E-10) and the validation cohort (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.82, p=0.001). The independent validation of the ProMCol classifier revealed a reduction of the prediction error for 3-year OS from 0.127, calculated only with standard clinical variables, to 0.120 combining the clinical variables with the classifier and for 4-year OS from 0.153 to 0.140. All results were confirmed for disease-specific survival., Conclusion: The ProMCol classifier could improve the prognostic accuracy for patients with non-metastatic CRC., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Pleiotropic effects of genetic risk variants for other cancers on colorectal cancer risk: PAGE, GECCO and CCFR consortia.
- Author
-
Cheng I, Kocarnik JM, Dumitrescu L, Lindor NM, Chang-Claude J, Avery CL, Caberto CP, Love SA, Slattery ML, Chan AT, Baron JA, Hindorff LA, Park SL, Schumacher FR, Hoffmeister M, Kraft P, Butler AM, Duggan DJ, Hou L, Carlson CS, Monroe KR, Lin Y, Carty CL, Mann S, Ma J, Giovannucci EL, Fuchs CS, Newcomb PA, Jenkins MA, Hopper JL, Haile RW, Conti DV, Campbell PT, Potter JD, Caan BJ, Schoen RE, Hayes RB, Chanock SJ, Berndt SI, Küry S, Bézieau S, Ambite JL, Kumaraguruparan G, Richardson DM, Goodloe RJ, Dilks HH, Baker P, Zanke BW, Lemire M, Gallinger S, Hsu L, Jiao S, Harrison TA, Seminara D, Haiman CA, Kooperberg C, Wilkens LR, Hutter CM, White E, Crawford DC, Heiss G, Hudson TJ, Brenner H, Bush WS, Casey G, Le Marchand L, and Peters U
- Subjects
- Aged, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8, Female, Genetic Markers, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotyping Techniques, Humans, Logistic Models, Male, Middle Aged, Principal Component Analysis, Registries, Risk Factors, Colorectal Neoplasms genetics, Genetic Pleiotropy, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
- Abstract
Objective: Genome-wide association studies have identified a large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with a wide array of cancer sites. Several of these variants demonstrate associations with multiple cancers, suggesting pleiotropic effects and shared biological mechanisms across some cancers. We hypothesised that SNPs previously associated with other cancers may additionally be associated with colorectal cancer. In a large-scale study, we examined 171 SNPs previously associated with 18 different cancers for their associations with colorectal cancer., Design: We examined 13 338 colorectal cancer cases and 40 967 controls from three consortia: Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE), Genetic Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer (GECCO), and the Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR). Study-specific logistic regression results, adjusted for age, sex, principal components of genetic ancestry, and/or study specific factors (as relevant) were combined using fixed-effect meta-analyses to evaluate the association between each SNP and colorectal cancer risk. A Bonferroni-corrected p value of 2.92×10(-4) was used to determine statistical significance of the associations., Results: Two correlated SNPs--rs10090154 and rs4242382--in Region 1 of chromosome 8q24, a prostate cancer susceptibility region, demonstrated statistically significant associations with colorectal cancer risk. The most significant association was observed with rs4242382 (meta-analysis OR=1.12; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.18; p=1.74×10(-5)), which also demonstrated similar associations across racial/ethnic populations and anatomical sub-sites., Conclusions: This is the first study to clearly demonstrate Region 1 of chromosome 8q24 as a susceptibility locus for colorectal cancer; thus, adding colorectal cancer to the list of cancer sites linked to this particular multicancer risk region at 8q24.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Cumulative impact of common genetic variants and other risk factors on colorectal cancer risk in 42,103 individuals.
- Author
-
Dunlop MG, Tenesa A, Farrington SM, Ballereau S, Brewster DH, Koessler T, Pharoah P, Schafmayer C, Hampe J, Völzke H, Chang-Claude J, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H, von Holst S, Picelli S, Lindblom A, Jenkins MA, Hopper JL, Casey G, Duggan D, Newcomb PA, Abulí A, Bessa X, Ruiz-Ponte C, Castellví-Bel S, Niittymäki I, Tuupanen S, Karhu A, Aaltonen L, Zanke B, Hudson T, Gallinger S, Barclay E, Martin L, Gorman M, Carvajal-Carmona L, Walther A, Kerr D, Lubbe S, Broderick P, Chandler I, Pittman A, Penegar S, Campbell H, Tomlinson I, and Houlston RS
- Subjects
- Alleles, Case-Control Studies, Colorectal Neoplasms epidemiology, Colorectal Neoplasms ethnology, Feasibility Studies, Female, Genotype, Humans, Logistic Models, Male, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Scotland epidemiology, Colorectal Neoplasms genetics, Genetic Predisposition to Disease genetics, Genetic Variation genetics
- Abstract
Objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) has a substantial heritable component. Common genetic variation has been shown to contribute to CRC risk. A study was conducted in a large multi-population study to assess the feasibility of CRC risk prediction using common genetic variant data combined with other risk factors. A risk prediction model was built and applied to the Scottish population using available data., Design: Nine populations of European descent were studied to develop and validate CRC risk prediction models. Binary logistic regression was used to assess the combined effect of age, gender, family history (FH) and genotypes at 10 susceptibility loci that individually only modestly influence CRC risk. Risk models were generated from case-control data incorporating genotypes alone (n=39,266) and in combination with gender, age and FH (n=11,324). Model discriminatory performance was assessed using 10-fold internal cross-validation and externally using 4187 independent samples. The 10-year absolute risk was estimated by modelling genotype and FH with age- and gender-specific population risks., Results: The median number of risk alleles was greater in cases than controls (10 vs 9, p<2.2 × 10(-16)), confirmed in external validation sets (Sweden p=1.2 × 10(-6), Finland p=2 × 10(-5)). The mean per-allele increase in risk was 9% (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.13). Discriminative performance was poor across the risk spectrum (area under curve for genotypes alone 0.57; area under curve for genotype/age/gender/FH 0.59). However, modelling genotype data, FH, age and gender with Scottish population data shows the practicalities of identifying a subgroup with >5% predicted 10-year absolute risk., Conclusion: Genotype data provide additional information that complements age, gender and FH as risk factors, but individualised genetic risk prediction is not currently feasible. Nonetheless, the modelling exercise suggests public health potential since it is possible to stratify the population into CRC risk categories, thereby informing targeted prevention and surveillance., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest with respect to the work presented in this paper.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Interval cancers after negative colonoscopy: population-based case-control study.
- Author
-
Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, and Hoffmeister M
- Subjects
- Age Distribution, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Case-Control Studies, Confidence Intervals, Early Detection of Cancer methods, False Negative Reactions, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Germany epidemiology, Humans, Incidence, Male, Mass Screening methods, Middle Aged, Odds Ratio, Risk Assessment, Sex Distribution, Time Factors, Colonoscopy methods, Colorectal Neoplasms diagnosis, Colorectal Neoplasms epidemiology, Mass Screening organization & administration, Occult Blood
- Abstract
Objective: The risk of colorectal cancer after a previous negative colonoscopy is very low. Nevertheless, interval cancers occur. We aimed to assess the characteristics and predictors of interval cancers after negative colonoscopy., Methods: A population-based case-control study was conducted in Southern Germany in 2003-7. Sociodemographic and tumour characteristics were compared among 78 patients with interval cancers occurring 1-10 years after a negative colonoscopy and 433 colorectal cancers detected at screening. In addition, the indication for the preceding negative colonoscopy and its completeness were compared between patients with interval cancers and 515 controls with a preceding negative colonoscopy., Results: 56.4% of interval cancers occurred among women compared with 33.7% of cases detected by screening (p=0.0001). After adjustment for covariates, female sex (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.83) and location in the caecum or ascending colon (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.17 to 3.35) were independently associated with occurrence of interval cancers. The preceding negative colonoscopy was more commonly conducted because of a positive faecal occult blood test (26.0% vs 12.9%, p=0.009) and was more often incomplete (caecum not reached: 18.1% vs 6.7%, p=0.001) among interval cancer cases than among controls. Characteristics of the preceding negative colonoscopy strongly and independently associated with occurrence of interval cancers were follow-up of a positive faecal occult blood test among men (OR 5.49, 95% CI 2.10 to 14.35) and incompleteness among women (OR 4.38, 95% CI 1.69 to 11.30)., Conclusions: The observed patterns suggest that a substantial proportion of interval cancers are due to neoplasms missed at colonoscopy and are potentially preventable by enhanced performance of colonoscopy.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Risk of progression of advanced adenomas to colorectal cancer by age and sex: estimates based on 840,149 screening colonoscopies.
- Author
-
Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Stegmaier C, Brenner G, Altenhofen L, and Haug U
- Subjects
- Adenoma epidemiology, Adenoma prevention & control, Age Distribution, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Colonoscopy, Colorectal Neoplasms epidemiology, Colorectal Neoplasms prevention & control, Disease Progression, Female, Germany epidemiology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Precancerous Conditions epidemiology, Precancerous Conditions pathology, Registries statistics & numerical data, Risk Factors, Sex Distribution, Adenoma pathology, Colorectal Neoplasms pathology, Mass Screening economics
- Abstract
Objectives: To derive age and sex specific estimates of transition rates from advanced adenomas to colorectal cancer by combining data of a nationwide screening colonoscopy registry and national data on colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence., Design: Registry based study., Setting: National screening colonoscopy programme in Germany., Patients: Participants of screening colonoscopy in 2003 and 2004 (n = 840,149)., Main Outcome Measures: Advanced adenoma prevalence, colorectal cancer incidence, annual and 10 year cumulative risk of developing CRC among carriers of advanced adenomas according to sex and age (range 55-80+ years), Results: The age gradient is much stronger for CRC incidence than for advanced adenoma prevalence. As a result, projected annual transition rates from advanced adenomas to CRC strongly increase with age (from 2.6% in age group 55-59 years to 5.6% in age group >or=80 years among women, and from 2.6% in age group 55-59 years to 5.1% in age group >or=80 years among men). Projections of 10 year cumulative risk increase from 25.4% at age 55 years to 42.9% at age 80 years in women, and from 25.2% at age 55 years to 39.7% at age 80 years in men., Conclusions: Advanced adenoma transition rates are similar in both sexes, but there is a strong age gradient for both sexes. Our estimates of transition rates in older age groups are in line with previous estimates derived from small case series in the pre-colonoscopy era independent of age. However, our projections for younger age groups are considerably lower. These findings may have important implications for the design of CRC screening programmes.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.