Search

Objectives: To apply the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) to a consecutive series of endometrial cancer (EC) patients diagnosed at a tertiary referral center and assign EC specimens to one of four molecular subgroups using immunohistochemistry (IHC) for p53/mismatch repair protein expression and sequencing for Polymerase Epsilon Exonuclease Domain Mutations (POLE-EDM). Mismatch Repair Deficient (MMR-D) cases were more thoroughly investigated to identify underlying somatic or germline genetic defects., Methods: Hundred-and eight consecutive endometrial cancer patients, diagnosed between March 2017 and April 2019, were subjected to immunohistochemical and molecular analysis, according to ProMisE. IHC for p53 and the mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, PMS2, MSH6 and PMS2) was performed. All patients were also tested for POLE-EDM by Sanger sequencing. In addition, tumor and corresponding normal tissue of cases with abnormal MMR IHC were tested by PCR for microsatellite instability (MSI) (MSI analysis system, Promega). Hypermethylation of MLH1 promotor was tested with (methylation specific) multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification. MMR-D cases were subjected to germline mutation analysis of the mismatch repair genes, using next generation sequencing on MiSeq (Illumina) with the BRCA Hereditary Cancer MASTR Plus, (Multiplicom/Agilent), RNA mutation analysis and MLPA., Results: FIGO classification was stage IA (n = 54), IB (n = 22) II(n = 8), III(n = 18) and IV(n = 6). Of the 33 patients with MMR-D on IHC (31%), 26 showed MLH1 promotor hypermethylation as the probable cause of MMR-D. The remaining 7 patients without MLH1 promotor hypermethylation were referred for germline analysis of Lynch syndrome. Six patients carried a pathogenic germline mutation in one of the mismatch repair genes: MSH6(n = 3), PMS2(n = 1), MLH1(n = 1) and MSH2 (n = 1). Pathogenic POLE-EDM were identified in 7 (6%) patients. Multiple molecular features (POLE-EDM + MMR-D or POLE-EDM + p53 abnormal) were observed in 4 patients (4%). A high concordance between MMR-D and microsatellite instability was observed in our cohort. In cases of a genetic defect in the MMR genes, we do note a large proportion of cases exhibiting microsatellite instability. On the contrary a hypermutation state, as seen in POLE EDM, does not result in accompanied phenotypic changes in MSI status., Conclusion: The ProMisE classification proved to be an efficient and easily implementable system. Future research should elucidate the precise biological and prognostic meaning of the cases with multiple molecular markers., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency and Bethesda panel microsatellite instability (MSI) are increasingly analyzed to identify tumors that might benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors, but tumor heterogeneity is a potential obstacle for such analyses. In ovarian cancer, data on intratumoral heterogeneity of MMR deficiency/MSI are lacking., Methods: N = 582 ovarian cancers were screened for MMR deficiency by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on a tissue microarray. 10 cases suspect for MMR deficiency were identified among 478 interpretable cancers and repeated IHC on large sections combined with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based MSI analysis validated MMR deficiency/MSI in 9 of these tumors., Results: MMR deficiency/MSI was predominantly seen in endmetrioid cancers (8 of 35, 23%) and also in 1 of 358 serous carcinomas (0.3%), but was absent in 34 mucinous carcinomas, 23 clear cell carcinomas, 17 malignant mixed Mullerian tumors (carcinosarcomas), and 11 mixed carcinomas. MMR deficiency involed protein loss of PMS2/MLH1 in 6 cases and of MSH2 and/or MSH6 in 3 cases. 7 MMR deficient cancers were MSI-high (all endometrioid), one was MSI-low (endometrioid) and one cancer with unequivocal MMR protein loss exhibited microsatellite stability (serous). MLH1 promotor methylation was observed in 4 of 5 endometrioid cancers with MLH1 protein loss. Immunostaining of all available cancer-containing tissue blocks (n = 114) of tumors with confirmed MMR deficiency/MSI revealed uniform MMR status throughout the entire tumor mass., Conclusions: Our data show that MSI is present in a substantial proportion of endometrioid ovarian cancers but can also occur in other tumor subtypes. MMR deficiency/MSI typically involves the entire tumor mass, suggesting that MMR inactivation occurs early in tumorigenesis in a subset of ovarian cancers., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the prevalence of MMR deficiency (dMMR) in contemporary reclassified high-grade endometrial carcinomas and correlate dMMR with molecular alterations and patient outcome., Methods: In this study we evaluated the expression of MLH1, MSH2, PMS2 and MSH6 assessed by two different methods in a series of 102 high-grade endometrial carcinomas. The series was comprised of 64 high-grade endometrioid carcinomas (HGEC), 27 serous (ESC), and 11 clear cell (CCC) carcinomas. Absence of expression in any of the proteins was considered dMMR. dMMR was correlated with clinicopathological parameters using a Chi-square test. Univariate and multivariate survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses., Results: The overall prevalence of dMMR was 28% (29/102) and was seen in 29/64 (45%) HGEC but not detected in any of the ESC and CCC. Within HGEC, dMMR was associated with loss of ARID1A (p=0.0099), loss of PTEN (p=0.044) and wild-type TP53 (p=0.024) expression. dMMR was associated with increased risk for disease specific death by univariate analysis (p=0.013) among stage III/IV HGEC but not in multivariate analysis (p=0.12)., Conclusions: Among high-grade endometrial carcinomas, dMMR is restricted to HGEC and could be used as an adjunct diagnostic tool to refute a diagnosis of ESC. The association with dMMR in HGEC with ARID1A/PTEN alterations, TP53 wild type expression pattern and unfavorable outcome suggests that different oncogenetic pathways within HGEC are present., (© 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary condition that increases the risk for endometrial and other cancers. Recognizing women at risk for LS based on personal/family history is burdensome and imprecise. Tumor testing using microsatellite instability (MSI) testing and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair protein expression can be an effective strategy for identifying potential LS in patients presenting with colorectal or endometrial cancer. Here we describe our experience implementing a screening program for endometrial cancers., Methods: Endometrial cancers diagnosed ≤50 years or those with suspicious personal history or histopathologic features were screened with MSI/IHC, June 2009-June 2011. Criteria were later (July 2011-July 2012) expanded to patients diagnosed <60 years, or at any age with suspicious features, and finally (after August 2012) universal screening was implemented. Screening techniques began with both MSI and IHC for every tumor, and later converted to IHC for two proteins, and MLH1 promoter methylation analysis when indicated. A genetic counselor contacted patients directly to offer genetic counseling appointments., Results: Two hundred and forty-five endometrial cancers (average age, 57 years) were screened. Sixty-two patients (25%) had abnormal results, and 42 patients were referred for genetic counseling. Of the 42 patients, 34 underwent genetic counseling, 28 pursued genetic testing, and 11 were diagnosed with LS. When age and pathology criteria were used, 27 eligible cases were overlooked for screening and 3 cases of LS were found only because a clinician requested screening., Conclusions: Universal screening of endometrial cancers for LS is practical and successfully implemented with collaboration among genetic counselors, gynecologic oncologists, and pathologists., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)