Search

Objective: To assess the influence of geographies and race on the survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) across three continents., Methods: This multicontinental retrospective study was conducted in 8 hospitals across Asia, Europe, and North America (NA). Clinicopathologic data of 595 patients with presumed early stages of CSCC, treated surgically, with curative intent was collected. Descriptive analysis and Cox regression models were produced., Results: A total of 595 patients, consisting of 445 (74.8 %) white, 75 (12.6 %) Blacks, and 75 (12.6 %) Asian patients were included. Geographical distribution comprised 69 % of patients from NA, 22 % from Europe, and 9 % from Asia. The median age at diagnosis was 46 years. The median overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 22.09 years and 21.19 years, respectively. Patient characteristics varied significantly across geographical regions, except for consensus tumor grade. Patients in Europe from middle-income countries with limited CC screening had a substantially higher risk of death than those in NA (HR, 1.79; 95 % CI, 1.13 to 2.79; p = 0.015). Patients from single center in Japan had higher risk of relapse than those from the four heterogeneous NA centers (sub-distribution hazard ratio, 2.19; 95 % CI, 1.22 to 3.95; p = 0.009), although OS did not differ significantly. Race remained statistically insignificant for survival outcomes across the three continents but seemed to influence survival outcomes in NA centers., Conclusion: Our study highlights impact of geographies and races on CSCC survival outcomes, emphasizing the need of considering these factors when developing targeted interventions against CSCC., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors whose names are listed immediately below certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers' bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: We evaluated clinicopathologic parameters of patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who were treated with initial surgical management and assessed their relation to survival outcomes. Specifically, we evaluated the relation between extent of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and survival outcomes., Methods: All available tumor slides from patients with initially surgically treated cervical SCC were collected from 10 institutions and retrospectively analyzed. Standard clinicopathological parameters, tumor stroma, and extent of LVI were assessed (focal: <5 spaces, extensive: ≥5 spaces). PFS and OS were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were created to determine prognostic survival-related risk factors., Results: A total of 670 tumor samples were included in the analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 47 years (IQR: 38-60), 457 patients (72%) had a 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I tumor, and 155 tumors (28%) were flat and/or ulcerated. There were 303 nonkeratinizing tumors (51%), 237 keratinizing tumors (40%), and 356 histologic grade 2 tumors (61%). Quantifiable LVI was present in 321 cases (51%; 23% focal and 33% extensive). On multivariable analysis for PFS, extensive and focal LVI had worse outcomes compared to negative LVI (HR: 2.38 [95% CI: 1.26-4.47] and HR: 1.54 [95% CI: 0.76-3.11], respectively; P = 0.02). The difference did not reach statistical significance for OS., Conclusion: Presence of LVI is a prognostic marker for patients with cervical SCC. Quantification (extensive vs. focal vs. negative) of LVI may be an important biomarker for oncologic outcome., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Outside the submitted work, N.R. Abu-Rustum reports research funding paid to the institution from GRAIL. A. Iasonos reports consulting fees from Mylan. All other authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: An effective treatment strategy for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with homologous recombination (HR)-proficient (HRP) phenotype has not been established, although poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) impact the disease course with HR-deficient (HRD) phenotype. Here, we aimed to clarify the cellular effects of paclitaxel (PTX) on the DNA damage response and the therapeutic application of PTX with PARPi in HRP ovarian cancer., Methods: Two models with different PTX dosing schedules were established in HRP ovarian cancer OVISE cells. Growth inhibition and HR activity were analyzed in these models with or without PARPi. BRCA1 phosphorylation status was examined in OVISE cells by inhibiting CDK1, which was reduced by PTX treatment. CDK1 expression was evaluated in EOC patients treated with PTX-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy., Results: PTX suppressed CDK1 expression resulting in impaired BRCA1 phosphorylation in OVISE cells. The reduced CDK1 activity by PTX could decrease HR activity in response to DNA damage and therefore increase the sensitivity to PARPi. Immunohistochemistry showed that CDK1 expression was attenuated in samples collected after PTX-based chemotherapy compared to those collected before chemotherapy. The decrease in CDK1 expression was greater with dose-dense PTX schedule than with the conventional PTX schedule., Conculsions: PTX could act synergistically with PARPi in HRP ovarian cancer cells, suggesting that the combination of PTX with PARPi may be a novel treatment strategy extending the utility of PARPi to EOC. Our findings provide cules for future translational clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of PTX in combination with PARPi in HRP ovarian cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is often resistant to conventional, standard chemotherapy using cytotoxic drugs. OCCC harbors a unique genomic feature of frequent (approximately 50%) ARID1A deficiency. The present study was performed to investigate standard chemotherapeutic options suitable for ARID1A-deficient OCCC patients., Methods: Drugs with selective toxicity to ARID1A-deficient OCCC cells were identified among six cytotoxic drugs used in standard chemotherapy for OCCC by employing multiple ARID1A-knockout cell lines and an OCCC cell line panel. Anti-tumor effects of drug treatment were assessed using a xenograft model. To obtain proof of concept in patients, seven OCCC patients who received single-agent therapy with gemcitabine were identified in a retrospective cohort of 149 OCCC patients. Patient samples and cases were analyzed for association between therapeutic response and ARID1A deficiency., Results: ARID1A-knockout and ARID1A-deficient OCCC cells had selective sensitivity to gemcitabine. IC50 values for gemcitabine of ARID1A-deficient cells were significantly lower than those of ARID1A-proficient cells (p = 0.0001). Growth of OCCC xenografts with ARID1A deficiency was inhibited by administration of gemcitabine, and gemcitabine treatment effectively induced apoptosis in ARID1A-deficient OCCC cells. Three ARID1A-deficient OCCC patients had significantly longer progression-free survival after gemcitabine treatment than four ARID1A-proficient OCCC patients (p = 0.02). An ARID1A-deficient case that was resistant to multiple cytotoxic drugs, including paclitaxel plus carboplatin in the adjuvant and etoposide plus irinotecan in the first-line treatment, exhibited a dramatic response to gemcitabine in the second-line treatment., Conclusion: ARID1A-deficient OCCC patients could benefit from gemcitabine treatment in clinical settings., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) frequently presents at an early stage. In stage I OCCC, the prognosis differs according to substage. In particular, predictive biomarkers and new treatment strategies are needed for stage IC2/IC3 disease. We investigated tumor biology and prognostic factors for stage I OCCC from a clinicopathological perspective, including the expression of ARID1A and IL-6, which are considered critical for OCCC carcinogenesis., Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 192 patients with stage I OCCC treated at a single institution was performed. We calculated overall survival (OS) with respect to 12 clinicopathological parameters that included the unique and diverse histological features of OCCC., Results: The estimated 5-year OS rate in patients with all stage I OCCC was 88.9% during a median of 91months of follow-up. The multivariate analysis indicated that substage classification and IL-6 expression status were associated with poor OS (p=0.010 and p=0.027, respectively). Loss of ARID1A expression had no impact on survival; however, it was associated with substage (p=0.001), capsule rupture status (p=0.011), and ascites cytology (p=0.016). No clear association was found between ARID1A and IL-6 expressions. Histological findings, including the presence of endometriosis, adenofibroma, architectural pattern, and tumor cell type, showed no prognostic effects., Conclusions: Both substage classification and IL-6 expression status may be independent prognostic factors in stage I OCCC. Therefore, IL-6 molecular stratification may be crucial in optimizing therapeutic strategies for early stage OCCC to improve survival., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)