Search

Background: The objective of this study is to assess the correlation between the pre-operative CA125 Elimination rate constant K(KELIM) score and the intraoperative chemo-response score (CRS) in patients with advanced high grade serous ovarian cancer(HGSC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NACT)., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with Stage III-IV HGSC treated with NACT from March 2010 to December 2019 at Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Canada. KELIM scores were calculated based on the tool devised by You et al. available online. CRS was assessed using an established 3-tier scoring system. An association analysis was performed to determine if the KELIM score assessed during NACT can predict CRS score at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery(ICS)., Results: 172 patients were included in this analysis. Patients with CRS 1-2 had a lower median Platinum Free Interval(PFI) (9.24 vs 13.64 months, p = 0.005), lower median progression free survival(PFS) (14.99 vs 20.29 months, p = 0.003) and lower 5-year overall survival(OS) (63.8% vs 69.7%, p = 0.54) compared to patients with CRS3. Among patients with CRS 1-2(n = 115), 68.7% had KELIM <1, while 56.2% of patients with CRS3 had KELIM ≥1(56.2%), p = 0.0017, suggesting a correlation between the KELIM and CRS scores. Furthermore, patients with KELIM ≥1 and CRS3 had significantly higher PFS compared to other groups(median PFS 28.27 months vs 17.66 months for KELIM ≥1/CRS 1/2; 17.13 months for KELIM <1/CRS 3; and 14.53 months for KELIM <1/CRS 1-2, p = 0.003)., Conclusion: The biochemical KELIM score correlated with the surgical pathologic CRS score and may predict pathological response to chemotherapy. This information can be utilized to tailor and personalize treatment in patients with advanced ovarian malignancy., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A randomized non-inferiority trial showed worse survival in women with early-stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy by minimally invasive approach compared to laparotomy; the impact of surgical approach on survival following radical trachelectomy is unknown., Objective: To examine oncologic outcomes in women with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent robotic or vaginal radical trachelectomy at Canadian cancer centers with the highest volumes of radical trachelectomy procedures., Study Design: Retrospective multi-centre cohort analysis which includes patients who had surgery between 2006 and 2019. Women with International FIGO 2009 stage IA-IB cervical cancer who underwent radical trachelectomy and lymph node assessment were grouped by surgical approach (vaginal versus robotic surgery)., Results: A total of 197 patients were included from 4 regional referral centres. 56 women underwent robotic radical trachelectomy and 141 underwent vaginal radical trachelectomy. All patients had lymph node assessment by a minimally invasive technique. Median age was 32 years, median tumor size was 12 mm, and median depth of invasion was 5 mm. Recurrence-free survival was 97% in both groups at a median follow-up of 57 months. On multivariable analysis, after adjusting for previously chosen confounders (high risk pathologic criteria, tumor size, and LVSI) there was no statistically significant difference in PFS between the 2 groups (HR 2.1, 95%CI 0.3-7.1, p = 0.5). Tumor size larger than 2 cm (HR 9.4, 95%CI 2.8-26, p = 0.003) was the only variable predictive of recurrence., Conclusion: Survival outcomes were excellent in both cohorts of patients undergoing robotic vs. vaginal radical trachelectomy. The surgical approach was not significantly associated with risk of recurrence after adjusting for clinically important confounders., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr. Allan Covens – Principal investigator for GOG278 trial. Dr. Marie Plante – Principal investigator for SHAPE trial. Funding for this project was through the Intuitive Foundation – This was a competitive grant application of a Physician-initiated project., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: The objective of this study is to externally validate the KELIM (rate of elimination of CA-125 elimation) score in patients with high grade serous ovarian cancer(HGSC)undergoing NACT and determine its relation to outcome of cytoreduction, platinum sensitivity, progression free(PFS) and overall survival(OS)., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with Stage III-IV HGSC diagnosed between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019 and treated with NACT. KELIM score was calculated using at least 3 CA-125 values within the first 100 days of chemotherapy. Demographic parameters were collected and Kaplan Meier survival analyses were performed for PFS and OS. This study was approved by local ethics board., Results: 217 patients met inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 28.93 months(range 2.86-135.06). There was no significant difference in stage, functional status, cytoreductive outcome or BRCA status(germline or somatic) between patients with a KELIM ≥ 1 and <1. Patients with a KELIM<1 had a lower median PFS (13.58 vs 19.69, p < 0.001), median platinum free interval(PFI) (7.66 vs 13.64, p < 0.001) and 5-year OS (57% vs 72%, p = 0.0140) compared to patients with KELIM≥1 . After adjusting for stage, treatment delays, bevacizumab or poly adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase(parp)-inhibitor use, and BRCA status, patients with KELIM<1 had a high risk of disease progression(HR = 1.57 (95% CI 1.08-2.28) and death(HR = 1.99 (95% CI 1.01-3.95) compared to KELIM≥1. BRCA status was independently associated to an increase on KELIM score (OR = 1.917, 95% CI 1.046-3.512, p = 0.035)., Conclusion: Patients with advanced HGSC undergoing NACT with a KELIM <1 were more likely to have platinum-resistant disease, worse PFS and worse OS when compared to patients with KELIM≥1. The KELIM score can be a helpful tool to predict chemo-response and aid in treatment decision making., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest There are no relevant conflicts of interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To report performance of an integrated predictive model (IPM) algorithm based on patient factors, surgical resectability and surgical complexity to predict outcome of primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) and guide treatment plan in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC)., Methods: Patients with AEOC between October 2018 and October 2020 were enrolled into a dedicated AEOC program and decision for PCS or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) was based on multidisciplinary consensus. Data of unresectable stage IVb, patient factors (PF), surgical resectability scores (SRS) and surgical complexity scores (SCS) was prospectively documented. An integrated prediction model (IPM) was developed to predict outcome of optimal (RD < 1 cm) cytoreduction. Retrospective analysis was performed to assess the performance of the IPM. Cut-offs were selected using the Youden Index., Results: Of 185 eligible patients, 81 underwent PCS and 104 were treated with NACT. Patients undergoing PCS had significantly lower median PF (0 vs 2, p < 0.01), SRS (2 vs 4, p < 0.01) and pre-operative SCS (6 vs 8.5, p = 0.01) compared to NACT. In patients undergoing PCS, 88% had optimal cytoreduction and 34.5% had grade 3-4 post-operative complications. A model triaging patients with unresectable Stage IVb, PF > 2, SRS > 5 and SCS > 9 to NACT had 85% sensitivity, 75% specificity and 85% accuracy for outcome of optimal cytoreduction. Our model would have improved triage of 3/10 sub-optimally cytoreduced patients to NACT. For outcome of no-gross residual disease (RD = 0 mm) using the same cut-offs sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 76% respectively., Conclusion: The 4-step IPM algorithm had high sensitivity and specificity for optimal cytoreduction with acceptable morbidity without delay to adjuvant therapy. This algorithm may be used to triage patients to PCS or NACT once it is further validated., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSC) is a relatively chemo-resistant disease with limited effective treatment options for patients with recurrence. Secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) is commonly offered at recurrence, although any benefit this has on survival is not fully determined. This review evaluates the impact of SCS, including residual disease, on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in recurrent LGSC., Methods: A comprehensive search of Medline ALL, Embase Classic + Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science was conducted to obtain studies evaluating optimal or complete SCS versus suboptimal SCS and the amount of residual disease in recurrent LGSC. Meta-analysis was performed and PFS and OS outcomes were calculated., Results: 1Of 5296 studies screened, 350 progressed to full-text review, with 9 ultimately selected for inclusion in the systematic review. Two studies met criteria for meta-analysis of PFS and of OS. The presence of visible residual disease at the conclusion of SCS negatively impacted PFS (HR = 3.51, 95% CI = 1.72-7.14), whereas SCS with no residual disease significantly improved OS (HR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.23-0.7) in patients with recurrent LGSC. Diffuse and extensive disease distribution was inversely linked to survival. In addition, SCS as an initial treatment for recurrent LGSC was associated with superior survival in comparison to chemotherapy. A short platinum-free interval was not associated with worse survival in this cohort., Conclusions: Complete SCS, and to a lesser extent optimal SCS, are associated with improved PFS and OS in patients with recurrent LGSC. SCS may be a better initial treatment strategy than systemic chemotherapy for recurrent disease. Patients with recurrent LGSC should be evaluated for the role of SCS based on disease distribution and functional status, irrespective of the platinum-free interval. Prospective studies are needed to further study the role of SCS in patients with recurrent LGSC., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflict of interests to declare., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is a rare form of ovarian cancer that accounts for 5-10% of epithelial ovarian cancers. LGSOCs are difficult to treat as they respond poorly to traditional chemotherapy treatments. This systematic review aims to appraise the literature describing the efficacy of hormone maintenance therapy (HMT) in patients with LGSOC given after cytoreductive surgery., Methods: Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from inception to November 2020. No language restrictions were applied. Publications describing HMT in the primary setting following cytoreductive surgery with or without chemotherapy in women with LGSOC were included. Publications describing HMT in recurrence, non-LGSOC carcinomas, and in-vitro or animal studies were excluded along with case reports, case series, and conference proceedings. We summarized oncologic outcomes, HMT used, and hormone receptor status where reported. Studies were assessed for risk of bias and quality of evidence., Results: The literature search identified 14,799 records. Four cohort studies met eligibility criteria. A total of 558 patients were included, of which 127 were treated with HMT. There was significant heterogeneity between studies demonstrated by differences in HMT regimens used, dosing, and study population, leading to various outcomes following treatment with HMT., Conclusions: Treatment of LGSOC remains a challenge. One retrospective study demonstrated improved progression-free survival following HMT for LGSOC, while two others failed to show significant improvements. However, there is limited data available in the literature which restricts the generalizability of these results. Therefore, well-designed, prospective, and randomized trials are needed to confirm the benefit of HMT in patients with this rare subgroup of ovarian cancer., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: BRCA-associated ovarian cancers are biologically unique; it is unclear if this translates to favorable outcomes at the time of primary cytoreduction (PCS). The aim of this study was to compare the amount of residual disease after PCS in BRCA mutated (BRCAm) and wild-type (BRCAwt) high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSC), and to assess whether BRCA status was an independent predictor of complete cytoreduction., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with stage III/IV HGSC with known germline and somatic BRCA status, treated with PCS from 2000 to 2017. We compared the complete, optimal and suboptimal cytoreduction rates between the BRCAm and BRCAwt cohorts and built a predictive model to assess whether BRCA status was predictive of complete cytoreduction., Results: Of 303 treated with PCS, 120 were germline/somatic BRCAm (40%) and 183 were BRCAwt (60%). BRCAm women tended to be younger, but there were no differences between the two groups in preoperative CA-125, disease burden, surgical complexity, length of surgery, or perioperative complications. BRCAm group had a higher rate of complete cytoreduction to no residual disease (0 mm) [72% vs. 48%] (p < 0.001). In a multivariate model, after accounting for age, length of surgery, CA-125 level, stage, disease burden and surgical complexity, BRCAm status was predictive of 0 mm residual disease with odds ratio of 5.3 (95% CI 2.45-11.5; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: BRCAm status is predictive of complete cytoreduction at the time of PCS. Despite similar disease burden and surgical efforts, one is more likely to achieve complete resection in BRCAm HGSC., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is a standard surgical approach for comprehensive surgical staging in women with endometrial cancer. As rates and complexity of MIS are steadily increasing, it is important to identify potential risk factors which may be associated with this approach. This study evaluates the impact of local factors on the risk of disease recurrence., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients diagnosed with high grade endometrial cancer (HGEC) who underwent MIS between 2012 and 2016 at eight Canadian centers. Data was collected from medical records. The 75th percentile was calculated for estimated uterine volume and weight. All recurrences were categorized into two groups; intra-abdominal vs. extra-abdominal. To search for significant covariates associated with recurrence-free survival a Cox proportional hazard model was performed., Results: A total of 758 patients were included in the study. Intra-uterine manipulator was used in 497 (35.8%) of patients. Vaginal lacerations were documented in 9.1%. Median follow-up was 30.5 months (interquartile range 20-47). There were 157 who had disease recurrence (20.71%), including 92 (12.14%) intra-abdominal and 60 (7.92%) extra-abdominal only recurrences. In univariate analysis myometrial invasion, LVI, stage, uterine volume and weight > 75th percentile and chemotherapy were associated with increased risk of intra-abdominal recurrence. In multivariable analysis only stage, and specimen weight > 75th percentile (OR 2.207, CI 1.123-4.337) remained significant. Uterine volume, and weight were not associated with increased risk of extra-abdominal recurrences., Conclusion: For patients diagnosed with HGEC undergoing MIS, extracting a large uterus is associated with a significantly increased risk for intra-abdominal recurrence., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Up to 20% of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOC) are hereditary; however, historical uptake of genetic testing is low. We used a unique combination of approaches to identify women in Ontario, Canada, with a first-degree relative (FDR) who died from HGSOC without prior genetic testing, and offer them multi-gene panel testing., Methods: From May 2015-Sept 2019, genetic counseling and testing was provided to eligible participants. Two recruitment strategies were employed, including self-identification in response to an outreach campaign and direct targeting of FDRs of deceased HGSOC patients treated at our institution. The rate of pathogenic variants (PV) in established/potential ovarian cancer risk genes and the benefits/challenges of each approach were assessed., Results: A total of 564 women enrolled in response to our outreach campaign (n = 473) or direct recruitment (n = 91). Mean age at consent was 52 years and 96% did not meet provincial testing criteria. Genetic results were provided to 528 individuals from 458 families. The rate of PVs in ovarian cancer risk genes was highest when FDRs were diagnosed with HGSOC <60 years (9.4% vs. 3.9% ≥ 60y, p = 0.0160). Participants in the outreach vs. direct recruitment cohort had a similar rate of PVs; however, uptake of genetic testing (97% vs. 89%; p = 0.0036) and study completion (95% vs. 87%; p = 0.0062) rates were higher in the former. Eleven participants with pathogenic variants have completed risk-reducing gynecologic surgery, with one stage I HGSOC and two breast cancers identified., Conclusion: Overall PV rates in this large cohort were lower than expected; however, we provide evidence that genetic testing criteria in Ontario should include individuals with a deceased FDR diagnosed with HGSOC <60 years of age., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To compare gynecologic oncology surgical treatment modifications and delays during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic between a publicly funded Canadian versus a privately funded American cancer center., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of all planned gynecologic oncology surgeries at University Health Network (UHN) in Toronto, Canada and Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) in Boston, USA, between March 22,020 and July 302,020. Surgical treatment delays and modifications at both centers were compared to standard recommendations. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for confounders., Results: A total of 450 surgical gynecologic oncology patients were included; 215 at UHN and 235 at BWH. There was a significant difference in median time from decision-to-treat to treatment (23 vs 15 days, p < 0.01) between UHN and BWH and a significant difference in treatment delays (32.56% vs 18.29%; p < 0.01) and modifications (8.37% vs 0.85%; p < 0.01), respectively. On multivariable analysis adjusting for age, race, treatment site and surgical priority status, treatment at UHN was an independent predictor of treatment modification (OR = 9.43,95% CI 1.81-49.05, p < 0.01). Treatment delays were higher at UHN (OR = 1.96,95% CI 1.14-3.36 p = 0.03) and for uterine disease (OR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.11-5.33, p = 0.03)., Conclusion: During the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic, gynecologic oncology patients treated at a publicly funded Canadian center were 9.43 times more likely to have a surgical treatment modification and 1.96 times more likely to have a surgical delay compared to an equal volume privately funded center in the United States., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To assess the cost-effectiveness of using maintenance hormonal therapy in patients with low grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSC)., Methods: A simulated decision analysis with a Markov decision model over a lifetime horizon was performed using the base case of a 47-year old patient with stage IIIC, LGSC following first-line treatment with primary cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Two treatment strategies were analyzed - maintenance daily letrozole until disease progression and routine observation. The analysis was from the perspective of the healthcare payer. Direct medical costs were estimated using public data sources and previous literature and were reported in adjusted 2018 Canadian dollars. The model estimated lifetime cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), life years (LY), median overall survival (OS), and number of recurrences with each strategy. Cost-effectiveness was compared using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). A strategy was considered cost-effective when the ICER was less than the willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000 CAD per QALY. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the impact of changing key clinical and cost variables., Results: Maintenance letrozole was the preferred strategy with an associated lifetime cost of $69,985 CAD ($52,620 USD) and an observed improvement of 0.91 QALYs and 1.55 LYs. The ICER for letrozole maintenance therapy was an additional $11,037 CAD ($8298 USD) per QALY. The modeled median OS was 150 months with maintenance letrozole and 126 months in the observation strategy. The maintenance letrozole strategy resulted in 34% and 17% fewer first recurrences at 5-year and 10-year follow-up, respectively., Conclusion: Maintenance letrozole is a cost-effective treatment strategy in patients with advanced LGSC resulting in clinically-relevant improvement in QALYs, LYs, and fewer disease recurrences., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors have any relevant conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: High grade cancers account for a disproportionate number of recurrences in patients with endometrial cancer. Accurately identifying these cases on endometrial biopsies allows for better surgical planning. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of general pathologists (GP) compared to gynecological pathologists (GYNP) in interpreting preoperative biopsies., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients diagnosed with high grade endometrial cancer (HGEC) between 2012 and 2016 at eight Canadian cancer centres. Data was collected from medical records. Pre-operative biopsies were categorized into groups; biopsies read by GP, GYNP and GP reviewed by GYNP. Rates of HGEC on pre-operative biopsy were calculated. Fisher exact test was used to compare differences between the groups. Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted for HGEC prediction., Results: Of 1237 patients diagnosed with HGEC, 245 (19.8%) did not have a preoperative diagnosis of high-grade disease. Discordancy was identified in 91/287 (31.71%) of biopsies reported by GP, and in 114/910 (12.53%) of biopsies reported by a GYNP (p < 0.0001). Compared to GP, GYNP were 3.24 (CI 2.36-4.45) times more likely to identify high grade disease on preoperative biopsy. Patients whose biopsy was reported by a GYNP were more likely to have a comprehensive staging procedure (OR 1.77 CI 1.33-2.38) and less likely to receive adjuvant therapy (OR 0.71 CI 0.52-0.96)., Conclusion: GYNP are more likely to identify HGEC on pre-operative biopsies. Due to high rates of overall discordancy, it is possible that surgical staging procedures should not be based solely on preoperative biopsy. Further strategies to improve pre-operative biopsies' accuracy are needed., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to determine if early administration of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy and intra-operative insertion of an IP port are associated with increased complications in patients who undergo a bowel resection procedure as part of primary cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer., Methods: This was a multi-centre retrospective cohort study, at 2 high volume cancer centers. For our primary outcomes, univariate logistic regression was completed to assess the impact of timing of IP chemotherapy administration and IP port insertion on perioperative complications. Kaplan Meier survival curves were compared using the Log-Rank test., Results: We identified 131 patients treated with IP chemotherapy after bowel resection during primary cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer; 75 patients started IP treatment at the first adjuvant chemotherapy, while 56 patients received intravenous (IV) chemotherapy and later transitioned to IP chemotherapy. The majority of patients had stage III/IV disease (87%) and high-grade serous histology (91.6%). Compared to patients who received their first cycle of chemotherapy IV, patients who started with IP chemotherapy were not at increased risk of intra-abdominal infections (8% vs 16% (p = 0.15)), IP port related complications (20% vs 19.6% (p = 0.96)), or anastomotic leak (2.7% vs 3.6% (p = 0.8)). There was a non-statistically significant trend for increased rates of anastomotic leak (5.6% vs 3.3% (p = 0.62)), intra-abdominal infection (16.7% vs 6.7% (p = 0.17)) and IP port related complications (24.1% vs 13.3% (p = 0.21)) in patients who had intra-operative IP port insertion compared to delayed post-operative port insertion., Conclusions: Administration of IP chemotherapy in the first post-operative cycle after bowel resection is not associated with increased post-operative complications in women with advanced ovarian carcinoma undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery. Intra-operative IP port insertion may be associated with a small increase in major complications in this population., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None of the authors have any relevant conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Real-time intraoperative assessment of anastomotic perfusion with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) is a recent technique that is found to assist intraoperative decision-making and decrease risk of anastomotic leak in the General Surgery literature. No studies to date evaluate its use in Gynecologic Oncology. Our objectives were to assess the safety and feasibility of ICG-FA use and to describe the intraoperative assessment of anastomotic perfusion with ICG-FA., Methods: A retrospective study of a prospectively-collected database of patients with a gynecologic malignancy who underwent a bowel resection at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, Canada, between November 1, 2017 and December 15, 2019 was conducted. ICG-FA was administered intravenously, and a near infrared imaging system (Pinpoint, Novadaq, Canada; SPY-PHI, Stryker, USA) was used to objectively assess bowel perfusion., Results: ICG-FA was used to assess a total of 100 bowel anastomoses in 82 consecutive surgeries: 56 low anterior resections, 19 small bowel resections, 15 right hemi-colectomies, 6 left hemi-colectomies, 3 transverse colectomies, and 1 total colectomy. Fifty-five end-to end, 44 side-to-side and 1 end-to-side anastomoses were assessed. ICG angiography was successful in all patients, allowing complete visualization of anastomotic perfusion in all cases. Hypoperfusion detected by ICG-FA resulted in change in operative plan for three patients (two anastomotic revisions and one diverting ileostomy). There were no adverse reactions to ICG. In this cohort, there was one postoperative anastomotic leak., Conclusions: ICG-FA enables objective and accurate intraoperative evaluation of anastomotic perfusion in surgeries for gynecologic malignancies. Its implementation and routine use were found to be safe and well-tolerated without side effects in our study cohort. ICG-FA can be used with other risk-assessment strategies to guide operative decision-making in Gynecologic Oncology., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest There are no conflicts of interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In January 2019, a group of basic, translational, and clinical investigators and patient advocates assembled in Miami, Florida, to discuss the current state of the science of low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum-a rare ovarian cancer subtype that may arise de novo or following a diagnosis of serous borderline tumor. The purpose of the conference was to review current knowledge, discuss ongoing research by established researchers, and frame critical questions or issues for future directions. Following presentations and discussions, the primary objective was to initiate future collaborations, uniform database platforms, laboratory studies, and clinical trials to better understand this disease and to advance clinical care outside the boundaries of single academic institutions. This review summarizes the state of the science in five principal categories: epidemiology and patient outcomes, pathology, translational research, patient care and clinical trials, and patients' perspective., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Overall, there are no conflicts of interest with regard to this article (individual COI are disclosed on COI forms)., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Six cycles of consolidation chemotherapy have become the standard for ovarian cancer treatment regimen following primary cytoreduction, yet with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), only 3 consolidation cycles are used. This study examines the effects of number of chemotherapy cycles in women with ovarian cancer that are being treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, we examined the effect of number of cycles on survival on consolidation and total chemotherapy., Methods: All patients with stage IIIC and IV high grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) were identified at 4 major Canadian cancer centers treated with NAC. A retrospective chart review was conducted using the medical charts and registry databases., Results: 403 NAC patients were identified. 47% had zero residual disease. Chemotherapy cycles were divided into <3cycles or ≥4cycles for NAC and consolidation treatments and analyzed with multivariate analysis. 139/403 (34.5%) received ≥4cycles of NAC and had a worse prognosis than <3cycles (p=0.011). 70/403 (17.4%) received ≥4cycles of consolidation treatment and there was no difference in survival (p=0.33) CONCLUSION: Women with advanced HGSC are managed with a combination of surgery and chemotherapy. This is a study of a homogenous cohort of patients with stage IIIC or IV high grade serous cancers who received NAC. ≥4cycles of NAC had a worse outcome than <3cycles likely due to poor prognostic factors or poor response. The number of consolidation cycles did not appear to make a difference in overall survival., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: After a diagnosis of ovarian cancer, positive BRCA mutation status confers a transient mortality benefit that diminishes with time. The majority of women who survive for 10-12 years are effectively cured of their disease. Thus, it is important to estimate the probability of long-term survival by BRCA mutation status and treatment-related factors., Methods: We included unselected epithelial ovarian cancers diagnosed in Ontario, Canada from 1995 to 1999 and from 2002 to 2004. Clinical information was obtained from medical records. Survival status was determined by linkage to the Ontario Cancer Registry. We estimated the annual mortality for these patients. We compared women who did and did not survive 10 years for a range of factors including BRCA mutation status and extent of residual disease post-surgery., Results: Of the 1421 patients, 109 (7.7%) had BRCA1 mutations and 68 (4.8%) had BRCA2 mutations. A status of no residual disease was achieved by 39% of non-carriers and 19% of mutation carriers (P<0.0001). By 10-years of follow-up, 43% of non-carriers, 57% of BRCA1 mutation carriers and 69% of BRCA2 mutation carriers had died from ovarian cancer. Among women with stage III/IV serous cancers and no residual disease, the 10-year actuarial survival was 42% for non-carriers and 29% for mutation carriers (P=0.40)., Conclusion: The initial survival advantage among women with BRCA mutations may reflect a higher initial sensitivity of BRCA carriers to chemotherapy, but this response does not predict long-term survival. The strongest predictor of long-term survival is status of no residual disease at resection., (Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: The aim of this investigation was to compare outcomes of patients with clear cell carcinoma (CCC) and endometrioid carcinoma (EC) of the ovary associated with endometriosis to patients with ovarian papillary serous carcinoma (PSC)., Methods: Patients with CCC and EC of the ovary associated with endometriosis were identified and matched by age and stage to PSC controls. Student's t test and chi square test were used to analyze continuous and categorical data. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis., Results: 67 cases associated with endometriosis were identified, of which 45 were arising in endometriosis. Cases were matched to 134 PSC controls. 27 patients with tumors associated with endometriosis presented at stage I (40.3%), 27 at stage II (40.3%), ten at stage III (14.9%) and three at stage IV (4.5%). There was no difference in rate of optimal cytoreduction or response to chemotherapy in cases vs. PSC controls. There was a significant increase in synchronous endometrial cancer in tumors associated with endometriosis compared to PSC (25.4% vs. 3.7%; P<0.001). 18 cases (26.9%) had recurrent disease vs. 55 (41%) controls (P=0.03). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with tumors associated with endometriosis compared to PSC controls were 75% vs. 55% (P=0.03) and 85% vs. 77% (P=0.2), respectively., Conclusions: Patients with tumors associated with endometriosis had a higher rate of synchronous endometrial cancer. Cases also demonstrated a lower rate of recurrence and improved 5 year DFS; however, this did not translate into a difference in OS., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To review the last 15 year experience of choriocarcinoma following a term gestation at the New England Trophoblastic Disease Center (NETDC) and compare these results to earlier data to determine any changes in the clinical presentation and outcome of this disease., Methods: Women with postterm choriocarcinoma from 1996 through 2011 followed by the NETDC were identified by diagnosis codes. Twenty charts were identified and reviewed. These data were then compared to published results from the NETDC of 44 women from 1964 to 1996., Results: Time from antecedent pregnancy to diagnosis of choriocarcinoma was significantly longer in the current series, 46.1 vs. 19.7 weeks (p = 0.03). Despite this change, patient outcomes remained comparable, with similar overall mortality rates (13% vs. 10%, p = NS). However, patient presentation was notably different. In the early series, five (11%) infants suffered hydrops or stillbirth, while in the recent series there were no adverse infant outcomes (p = 0.08). Six women in the current series presented in the absence of symptoms suspicious for choriocarcinoma (either by an incidental positive pregnancy test without other symptoms or by placental pathology), compared to one woman in the prior series (30% vs. 2%, p = 0.001)., Conclusions: In recent years postterm choriocarcinoma is being diagnosed or referred later after the antecedent pregnancy at our regional referral center. Recent patients more commonly have no other symptoms than a question of pregnancy and are less likely diagnosed due to the presence of fetal hydrops or stillbirth. Despite later diagnoses, survival with postterm choriocarcinoma continues to be high., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)