Search

After treatment for ovarian cancer, women want to know when they will feel 'normal' again. Our objective was to document the proportions of women with high levels of physical and emotional symptoms at the end of treatment, determine if/when they return to normal and identify groups at risk of persistent symptoms/delayed recovery.Women in the OPAL (Ovarian cancer Prognosis And Lifestyle) study who received ≥3 cycles of first-line chemotherapy and completed patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires on or 6 weeks after completing chemotherapy (baseline) were included in this analysis (n = 527). PRO measures included anxiety, depression, insomnia, fatigue and wellbeing (quality-of-life) at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 18 months post-baseline. Group-based trajectory models identified clusters of individuals who followed similar patterns. Logistic and Cox regression identified factors associated with persistent symptoms and delayed recovery, respectively.At baseline, 57% of women reported moderate-to-severe fatigue, 22% anxiety, 20% depression, 14% clinical insomnia and 45% had quality-of-life scores significantly lower than the general population. Between 50 and 75% of individual PRO scores normalised within six months, with the exception of emotional wellbeing (42%), but approximately two-in-five women still had at least one persistently poor PRO at 18 months. Women with more severe symptoms at baseline, who were younger, or had a history of anxiety/depression were more likely to have persistent symptoms or delayed recovery.Two-in-five women might never fully return to 'normal' after completing primary treatment for ovarian cancer. Those with risk factors should be triaged for early supportive interventions.

Objectives Insomnia is common in women with ovarian cancer but there are limited prospective data on the frequency and degree of impact on patients. Our objective was to determine the prevalence of insomnia over the first three years after a diagnosis of ovarian cancer; and the relationship between insomnia and quality of life. Methods OPAL (Ovarian cancer, Prognosis And Lifestyle) is a prospective study of Australian women with epithelial ovarian cancer; 894 provided information on insomnia symptoms, medications and quality of life at three, six, nine, 12, 24 and 36 months after diagnosis. Generalised linear mixed models were used to determine the relationship between insomnia and quality of life measured at the same time and three months later. Results One-quarter of women reported symptoms consistent with clinical insomnia within three years after diagnosis and an additional 13% regularly used sleep medication (total 36% affected). Excluding 7% who reported insomnia symptoms before diagnosis, 22% reported new insomnia, which reduced to 17% when also excluding women on chemotherapy. The proportion of women with clinical (14%) or subclinical (28%) insomnia symptoms was highest at three months after diagnosis. Compared to women with no insomnia, those with clinical insomnia had significantly lower quality of life measured at the same time (8.4 points lower, 95% CI: 7.2–9.5), and three months later (5.5 points lower, 95% CI: 3.4–7.6). Conclusions Over a third of women with ovarian cancer likely experience insomnia after diagnosis; this may persist and is associated with poorer quality of life.

Knowledge on the course of symptoms patients with ovarian cancer experience is limited. We documented the prevalence and trajectories of symptoms after first-line chemotherapy using the Measure of Ovarian Symptoms and Treatment concerns (MOST).A total of 726 patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy for ovarian cancer were asked to complete the MOST every 3 months, beginning 6 months post-diagnosis and continuing for up to 4 years. We used descriptive statistics to examine temporal changes in MOST-S26 index scores for disease or treatment-related (MOST-DorT), neurotoxicity (MOST-NTx), abdominal (MOST-Abdo), and psychological (MOST-Psych) symptoms, and wellbeing (MOST-Wellbeing) and selected individual symptoms. We used group-based trajectory models to identify groups with persistently poor symptoms.The median MOST-Abdo, MOST-DorT and MOST-Wellbeing score were worst at chemotherapy-end but improved and stabilised by 1, 3 and 12 months after treatment, respectively. The median MOST-NTx score peaked at 1 month after treatment before improving, while the median MOST-Psych score did not change substantially over time. Long-term moderate-to-severe fatigue (32%), trouble sleeping (31%), sore hands and feet (21%), pins and needles (20%) and anxiety (18%) were common. Trajectory models revealed groups of patients with persistent symptoms had MOST-DorT scores above 30 and MOST-NTx scores above 40 at treatment-end.Although many patients report improvements in symptoms by 3 months after first-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer, patients who score 30/100 on MOST-S26-DorT or 40/100 on MOST-S26-NTx at the end of chemotherapy are likely to have persistent symptoms. The MOST could triage this at-risk subset for early intervention.

Objective To quantitatively assess and compare the quality of life (QoL) of women with a self-reported diagnosis of lower limb lymphedema (LLL), to women with lower limb swelling (LLS), and to women without LLL or LLS following treatment for endometrial cancer. Methods 1399 participants in the Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study were sent a follow-up questionnaire 3–5years after diagnosis. Women were asked if they had experienced swelling in the lower limbs and, if so, whether they had received a diagnosis of lymphedema by a health professional. The 639 women who responded were categorized as: Women with LLL (n=68), women with LLS (n=177) and women without LLL or LLS (n=394). Multivariable-adjusted generalized linear models were used to compare women's physical and mental QoL by LLL status. Results On average, women were 65years of age and 4years after diagnosis. Women with LLL had clinically lower physical QoL ( M =41.8, SE =1.4) than women without LLL or LLS ( M =45.1, SE =0.8, p =.07), however, their mental QoL was within the normative range ( M =49.6; SE =1.1 p =1.0). Women with LLS had significantly lower physical ( M =41.0, SE =1.0, p =.003) and mental QoL ( M =46.8; SE =0.8, p M =50.6, SE =0.8). Conclusion Although LLL was associated with reductions in physical QoL, LLS was related to reductions in both physical and mental QoL 3–5years after cancer treatment. Early referral to evidence-based lymphedema programs may prevent long-term impairments to women's QoL.

Although most women diagnosed with ovarian cancer initially respond to first-line chemotherapy, the vast majority eventually relapses and requires retreatment with second-line chemotherapy. Patient response is classified as either platinum sensitive or platinum resistant on the basis of the time of relapse after first-line treatment. A cancer with a progression-free interval of more than 6 months after completion of first-line chemotherapy is classified as “platinum-sensitive disease” and responds well to retreatment. A cancer with a progression-free interval of less than 6 months after completion of first-line chemotherapy is classified as “platinum-resistant disease” and responds poorly to second-line retreatment. Cure is not possible in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer, and long-term progression-free survival is rare. The goal of care in these patients should be to maximize their quality of life. The aim of this population-based longitudinal study was to determine whether quality of life improves after second-line chemotherapy among women with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. A secondary aim was to evaluate treatment response. Data for 172 women from 2 studies were combined. All participants were treated with chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer and completed a validated quality of life questionnaire every 3 months. Change in quality of life during the first 6 months after second-line chemotherapy was analyzed using mixed effect models. A comparison group was composed of women with platinum-sensitive disease. Among the 172 patients, 44 (25%) were classified as having platinum-resistant disease. After the start of second-line chemotherapy, there was no significant increase or decrease in quality of life of women with platinum-resistant disease (least square mean scores at chemotherapy start, 3 months later, and 6 months later: 107, 105, and 103, respectively), although 26% reported a meaningful increase and 31% reported a meaningful decline. One third of the women with platinum-resistant cancer responded (11% complete and 21% partial response) to second-line chemotherapy; the response rate increased to 54% among the subset retreated with platinum-based agents with or without other agents. Preliminary subgroup analysis suggested that quality of life in women whose disease responded may be higher at the start of chemotherapy (median score, 121 vs 110). These findings show that the overall quality of life is maintained among women with recurrent platinum-resistant disease after retreatment with chemotherapy; however, some patients showed a meaningful increase whereas some showed a decline.