7 results on '"Paris, Laura"'
Search Results
2. Lenalidomide-based induction and maintenance in elderly newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: updated results of the EMN01 randomized trial
- Author
-
Bringhen, Sara, primary, D’Agostino, Mattia, additional, Paris, Laura, additional, Ballanti, Stelvio, additional, Pescosta, Norbert, additional, Spada, Stefano, additional, Pezzatti, Sara, additional, Grasso, Mariella, additional, Rota-Scalabrini, Delia, additional, De Rosa, Luca, additional, Pavone, Vincenzo, additional, Gazzera, Giulia, additional, Aquino, Sara, additional, Poggiu, Marco, additional, Santoro, Armando, additional, Gentile, Massimo, additional, Baldini, Luca, additional, Petrucci, Maria Teresa, additional, Tosi, Patrizia, additional, Marasca, Roberto, additional, Cellini, Claudia, additional, Palumbo, Antonio, additional, Falco, Patrizia, additional, Hájek, Roman, additional, Boccadoro, Mario, additional, and Larocca, Alessandra, additional
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. First-line therapy with either bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone or lenalidomide-dexamethasone followed by lenalidomide for transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma patients: a pooled analysis of two randomized trials
- Author
-
Larocca, Alessandra, primary, Mina, Roberto, additional, Offidani, Massimo, additional, Liberati, Anna Marina, additional, Ledda, Antonio, additional, Patriarca, Francesca, additional, Evangelista, Andrea, additional, Spada, Stefano, additional, Benevolo, Giulia, additional, Oddolo, Daniela, additional, Innao, Vanessa, additional, Cangiolosi, Clotilde, additional, Bernardini, Annalisa, additional, Musto, Pellegrino, additional, Amico, Valeria, additional, Fraticelli, Vincenzo, additional, Paris, Laura, additional, Giuliani, Nicola, additional, Falcone, Antonietta Pia, additional, Zambello, Renato, additional, De Paoli, Lorenzo, additional, Romano, Alessandra, additional, Palumbo, Antonio, additional, Montefusco, Vittorio, additional, Hájek, Roman, additional, Boccadoro, Mario, additional, and Bringhen, Sara, additional
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Pre-chemotherapy risk factors for invasive fungal diseases: prospective analysis of 1,192 patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (SEIFEM 2010-a multicenter study)
- Author
-
Caira, M., Candoni, A., Verga, L., Busca, A., Delia, M., Nosari, A., Caramatti, C., Castagnola, C., Cattaneo, C., Fanci, R., Chierichini, A., Melillo, L., Mitra, M. E., Picardi, M., Potenza, L., Salutari, P., Vianelli, N., Facchini, L., Cesarini, M., De Paolis, M. R., Di Blasi, R., Farina, F., Venditti, A., Ferrari, A., Garzia, M., Gasbarrino, C., Invernizzi, R., Lessi, F., Manna, A., Martino, B., Nadali, G., Offidani, M., Paris, L., Pavone, V., Rossi, G., Spadea, A., Specchia, G., Trecarichi, E. M., Vacca, A., Cesaro, S., Perriello, V., Aversa, F., Tumbarello, M., Pagano, L., Ragionieri, R., Orsola Malpighi, O. S., Antoniazzi, F., Storti, S., Luppi, M., Pagliuca, S., Rossetti, E., Da Vià, M., Di Caprio, L., Majolino, I., Cascavilla, N., Turri, G., Fanin, Renato, Sorveglianza Epidemiologica Infezioni Fungine in Emopatie Maligne, Caira, Morena, Candoni, Anna, Verga, Luisa, Busca, Alessandro, Delia, Mario, Nosari, Annamaria, Caramatti, Cecilia, Castagnola, Carlo, Cattaneo, Chiara, Fanci, Rosa, Chierichini, Anna, Melillo, Lorella, Mitra, Maria Enza, Picardi, Marco, Potenza, Leonardo, Salutari, Prassede, Vianelli, Nicola, Facchini, Luca, Cesarini, Monica, De Paolis, Maria Rosaria, Di Blasi, Roberta, Farina, Francesca, Venditti, Adriano, Ferrari, Antonella, Garzia, Mariagrazia, Gasbarrino, Cristina, Invernizzi, Rosangela, Lessi, Federica, Manna, Annunziata, Martino, Bruno, Nadali, Gianpaolo, Offidani, Massimo, Paris, Laura, Pavone, Vincenzo, Rossi, Giuseppe, Spadea, Antonio, Specchia, Giorgina, Trecarichi, Enrico Maria, Vacca, Adriana, Cesaro, Simone, Perriello, Vincenzo, Aversa, Franco, Tumbarello, Mario, and Pagano, Livio
- Subjects
Myeloid ,Male ,Antifungal Agents ,invasive fungal diseases ,Mycose ,Risk Factors ,Epidemiology ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,Antifungal Agent ,Prospective Studies ,Prospective cohort study ,Univariate analysis ,leukemia ,Myeloid leukemia ,Hematology ,Environmental exposure ,Articles ,Middle Aged ,Prognosis ,Survival Rate ,Leukemia ,Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute ,Female ,Case-Control Studie ,Human ,Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Prognosi ,risk factors ,acute myeloid leukemia ,Neutropenia ,Acute ,Settore MED/17 - MALATTIE INFETTIVE ,Aged ,Case-Control Studies ,Follow-Up Studies ,Humans ,Mycoses ,Neoplasm Staging ,Immunocompromised Host ,Follow-Up Studie ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocol ,Performance status ,business.industry ,Risk Factor ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Prospective Studie ,Settore MED/15 - MALATTIE DEL SANGUE ,Fungal Disease ,business - Abstract
Correct definition of the level of risk of invasive fungal infections is the first step in improving the targeting of preventive strategies. We investigated the potential relationship between pre-hospitalization exposure to sources of fungi and the development of invasive fungal infections in adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia after their first course of chemotherapy. From January 2010 to April 2012, all consecutive acute myeloid leukemia patients in 33 Italian centers were prospectively registered. Upon first admission, information about possible pre-chemotherapy risk factors and environmental exposure was collected. We recorded data regarding comorbid conditions, employment, hygienic habits, working and living environment, personal habits, hobbies, and pets. All invasive fungal infections occurring within 30 days after the first course of chemotherapy were recorded. Of the 1,192 patients enrolled in this study, 881 received intensive chemotherapy and were included in the present analysis. Of these, 214 developed an invasive fungal infection, including 77 proven/probable cases (8.7%). Of these 77 cases, 54 were proven/probable invasive mold infections (6.1%) and 23 were proven yeast infections (2.6%). Upon univariate analysis, a significant association was found between invasive mold infections and age, performance status, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, smoking, cocaine use, job, hobbies, and a recent house renovation. Higher body weight resulted in a reduced risk of invasive mold infections. Multivariate analysis confirmed the role of performance status, job, body weight, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and house renovation. In conclusion, several hospital-independent variables could potentially influence the onset of invasive mold infections in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Investigation of these factors upon first admission may help to define a patient's risk category and improve targeted prophylactic strategies. (Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT01315925)
- Published
- 2015
5. Lenalidomide-based triplet regimens in first relapsed multiple myeloma patients: real-world evidence from a propensity score matched analysis.
- Author
-
Mangiacavalli S, Cartia CS, Galli M, Pezzatti S, Belotti A, Fazio F, Mina R, Marcatti M, Cafro A, Zambello R, Paris L, Barilà G, Olivares C, Pompa A, Mazza R, Farina F, Soldarini M, Benvenuti P, Pagani G, Palumbo M, Masoni V, Ferretti VV, Klersy C, Arcaini L, and Petrucci MT
- Subjects
- Humans, Lenalidomide therapeutic use, Propensity Score, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local drug therapy, Dexamethasone therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Multiple Myeloma drug therapy
- Abstract
Lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd)-based triplets, in particular carfilzomib-Rd (KRd) and daratumumab-Rd (DaraRd), represent a standard of care in lenalidomide-sensitive multiple myeloma (MM) patients in first relapse. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT), suggested better outcome with DaraRd. Trying to address this issue in clinical practice, we collected data of 430 consecutive MM patients addressed to Rd-based triplets in first relapse between January 2017 and March 2021. Overall, the most common used regimen was DaraRd, chosen in almost half of the cases (54.4%), followed by KRd (34.6%). Different triplets were used much less commonly. In an attempt to limit the imbalance of a retrospective analysis, we conducted a propensity score matching (PSM) comparison between DaraRd and KRd. After PSM, efficacy of DaraRd versus KRd was similar in terms of overall-response rate (ORR) (OR: 0.9, P=0.685) as well as of very good partial response (VGPR) or better (OR: 0.9, P=0.582). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for DaraRd (29.8 vs. 22.5 months; P=0.028). DaraRd was tolerated better, registering a lower rate of grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity (OR: 0.4, P<0.001). With the limitations of any retrospective analysis, our real-life PSM comparison between DaraRd and KRd, in first-relapse MM patients, showed better tolerability and prolonged PFS of DaraRd, although with some gaps of performance, in particular of DaraRd, with respect to RCT. Carfilzomib-containing regimens, like KRd, still remain a valid second-line option in the emerging scenario of first-line daratumumab-based therapy.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Lenalidomide-based induction and maintenance in elderly newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: updated results of the EMN01 randomized trial.
- Author
-
Bringhen S, D'Agostino M, Paris L, Ballanti S, Pescosta N, Spada S, Pezzatti S, Grasso M, Rota-Scalabrini D, De Rosa L, Pavone V, Gazzera G, Aquino S, Poggiu M, Santoro A, Gentile M, Baldini L, Petrucci MT, Tosi P, Marasca R, Cellini C, Palumbo A, Falco P, Hájek R, Boccadoro M, and Larocca A
- Subjects
- Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Dexamethasone therapeutic use, Disease-Free Survival, Humans, Maintenance Chemotherapy, Melphalan therapeutic use, Prednisone therapeutic use, Progression-Free Survival, Treatment Outcome, Lenalidomide therapeutic use, Multiple Myeloma diagnosis, Multiple Myeloma drug therapy
- Abstract
n the EMN01 trial, the addition of an alkylator (melphalan or cyclophosphamide) to lenalidomide-steroid induction therapy was prospectively evaluated in transplant-ineligible patients with multiple myeloma. After induction, patients were randomly assigned to maintenance treatment with lenalidomide alone or with prednisone continuously. The analysis presented here (median follow-up of 71 months) is focused on maintenance treatment and on subgroup analyses defined according to the International Myeloma Working Group Frailty Score. Of the 654 evaluable patients, 217 were in the lenalidomide-dexamethasone arm, 217 in the melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide arm and 220 in the cyclophosphamide-prednisone-lenalidomide arm. With regards to the Frailty Score, 284 (43%) patients were fit, 205 (31%) were intermediate-fit and 165 (25%) were frail. After induction, 402 patients were eligible for maintenance therapy (lenalidomide arm, n=204; lenalidomide-prednisone arm, n=198). After a median duration of maintenance of 22.0 months, progression-free survival from the start of maintenance was 22.2 months with lenalidomide-prednisone vs 18.6 months with lenalidomide (hazard ratio 0.85, P =0.14), with no differences across frailty subgroups. The most frequent grade ≥3 toxicity was neutropenia (10% of lenalidomide-prednisone and 21% of lenalidomide patients; P =0.001). Grade ≥3 non-hematologic adverse events were rare (<15%). In fit patients, melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared to cyclophosphamide-prednisone-lenalidomide (hazard ratio 0.72, P =0.05) and lenalidomide-dexamethasone (hazard ratio 0.72, P =0.04). Likewise, a trend towards a better overall survival was noted for patients treated with melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide or cyclophosphamide-prednisone-lenalidomide, as compared to lenalidomide-dexamethasone. No differences were observed in intermediate-fit and frail patients. This analysis showed positive outcomes of maintenance with lenalidomide-based regimens, with a good safety profile. For the first time, we showed that fit patients benefit from a full-dose triplet regimen, while intermediate-fit and frail patients benefit from gentler regimens. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01093196., (Copyright© 2020 Ferrata Storti Foundation.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. First-line therapy with either bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone or lenalidomide-dexamethasone followed by lenalidomide for transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma patients: a pooled analysis of two randomized trials.
- Author
-
Larocca A, Mina R, Offidani M, Liberati AM, Ledda A, Patriarca F, Evangelista A, Spada S, Benevolo G, Oddolo D, Innao V, Cangiolosi C, Bernardini A, Musto P, Amico V, Fraticelli V, Paris L, Giuliani N, Falcone AP, Zambello R, De Paoli L, Romano A, Palumbo A, Montefusco V, Hájek R, Boccadoro M, and Bringhen S
- Subjects
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Humans, Treatment Outcome, Bortezomib therapeutic use, Dexamethasone therapeutic use, Lenalidomide therapeutic use, Melphalan therapeutic use, Multiple Myeloma diagnosis, Multiple Myeloma drug therapy, Prednisone therapeutic use
- Abstract
Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) and continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) represent the standard treatment of transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). To date, no randomized trial has compared VMP to Rd, and there is no evidence of the optimal treatment for newly diagnosed MM, particularly in patients with high-risk cytogenetics [del(17p), t(4;14) or t(14;16)]. We pooled together data from patients with newly diagnosed MM treated with VMP or Rd induction followed by lenalidomide maintenance 10 mg (Rd-R) enrolled in the GIMEMA-MM-03-05 and EMN01 trials, to evaluate the efficacy of these treatments in different subgroups of patients, focusing on those with standard- and high-risk cytogenetics. Overall, 474 patients were analyzed (VMP: 257 patients; Rd-R: 217 patients). No differences in progression-free survival (hazard ratio=0.96) and overall survival (hazard ratio=1.08) were observed between standard-risk patients treated with VMP or Rd-R, whereas among the high-risk patients, the probabilities of progression (hazard ratio=0.54) and death (hazard ratio=0.73) were lower in the patients treated with VMP than in those treated with Rd-R. In particular, standard-risk patients >75 years benefited less from VMP than from Rd-R (hazard ratio for progression-free survival=0.96; hazard ratio for overall survival=1.81). In this non-randomized analysis, VMP and Rd-R were equally effective in younger (≤75 years), standard-risk patients, while older ones (>75 years) benefited more from Rd-R. In high-risk patients, VMP improved progression-free survival and overall survival irrespective of age. The source trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01063179 and NCT01093196)., (Copyright© 2020 Ferrata Storti Foundation.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.