Search

Some 10-20% of bleeding events in haemophilia patients with high-responding inhibitors cannot be controlled with bypassing agents. However, sequential combined bypassing therapy (SCBT) has been reported to be successful in five children. To extend this observation, a survey was undertaken by the European Haemophilia Treatment Standardisation Board (EHTSB) in children and adults. Data were collected from all centres belonging to the EHTSB network by a retrospective medical record review. SCBT courses were defined as the administration of both recombinant activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa) and activated prothrombin complex concentrate (APCC) within 12 h. A web-based database was prepared to collect data on SCBT courses in a standardized and anonymous manner from patients' files. Eleven inhibitor patients underwent SCBT (nine haemophilia A; two haemophilia B). Two children had refractory knee haemarthrosis and one, an unresponsive calf haematoma. Five adults had significant bleeds following major surgery, one had lower limb compartmental syndrome and one a post-traumatic upper limb haematoma and haemarthrosis. SCBT administration alternated one APCC dose to 1-3 rFVIIa doses: dosing intervals ranged between 3 and 6 h; APCC (20-80 U kg(-1) ) was given every 8-12 h; rFVIIa (90-270 μg kg(-1) ) was given every 3-12 h. Bleeding control was achieved in 12-24 h in all patients. SCBT was discontinued after 1-15 days. No clinical adverse events were observed, but a significant increase in D-dimer levels was seen in three/five patients who were assessed. SCBT was efficacious without adverse events; nevertheless, due to potential risks, it remains a salvage treatment. A prospective clinical trial is needed to provide further evidence., (© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Summary: The development of inhibitors to the infused factor in patients with haemophilia is a serious clinical problem. Recent evidence suggests that alongside the strong genetic contribution to inhibitor formation, there are a number of non-genetic factors--perceived by the immune system as danger signals--which promote formation of inhibitors. This study provides a comprehensive review of clinical studies relating to these factors and also presents a survey of opinion concerning their importance and clinical influence, conducted among the members of the European Haemophilia Treatment Standardisation Board (EHTSB). Taken together, this information highlights the lack of robust data concerning the influence of several non-genetic risk factors on inhibitor development, and an urgent need for prospective, well-conducted studies that adhere to recommendations made by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) for studying inhibitors. Based on current literature, the EHTSB formulated consensus recommendations. It is desirable to minimize intensive treatment wherever possible, given the clinical situation. Prophylaxis should be offered to all children, although we still need to determine optimal dosing with respect to inhibitor development, and age for starting treatment. Vaccinations should be given subcutaneously and concomitant factor concentrate infusions avoided. According to the board, there is no evidence in the literature supporting suggestions that the type of concentrate influences inhibitor risk; but all patients should be monitored during their first exposures. Furthermore, there is no evidence to support an association between pregnancy-related issues, breast feeding and treatment-related factors (e.g. route of administration, or use of blood components) and inhibitor development.

Although most surgical and invasive procedures can be performed safely in patients with haemophilia, the optimal level and duration of replacement therapy required to prevent bleeding complications have not been established conclusively. For providing more insight into optimal therapy during invasive procedures, a literature review of surgical procedures in patients with haemophilia was conducted. Concomitantly, current practice was surveyed in 26 European Haemophilia Comprehensive Care Centres, representing 15 different countries. The review identified 110 original papers published between 1965 and 2007. Of these, only two studies were randomized controlled trials. Target levels and the duration of replacement therapy in the published studies were as follows. For major orthopaedic surgery: preoperative targets were 80-90%; postoperative targets showed a high degree of variation, with trough levels ranging from 20% to 80%, duration 10-14 days; for liver biopsy, 70-100%, 1-7 days; tonsillectomy: 90-100%, 5-11 days; indwelling venous access device insertion: 100%, 3-10 days; circumcision: 50-60%, 2-4 days; dental surgery: 30-50%, single treatment. With the exception of dental surgery, current practice in Europe, as assessed by the survey, was largely in agreement with published data. In conclusion, this study provides both a comprehensive review and a large survey of replacement therapy in patients with haemophilia undergoing invasive procedures; these data have informed the consensus practical treatment recommendations made in this paper. This study highlights the need for better-designed studies in order to better define minimal haemostatic levels of replacement therapy and optimal treatment duration.

A survey of 21 haemophilia doctors, throughout Europe, who care for a total of approximately 5000 patients with bleeding disorders addressing practice and opinions regarding prophylaxis in patients aged 16-24 years and adults aged over 50 years, is presented. The outcome of adolescent patients who reduced or stopped prophylaxis was recorded. Eighteen of 19 respondents would consider modification of established prophylaxis in the adolescent age group, principal considerations being avoidance of risks of further concentrate exposure, predicted poor compliance and treatment costs. The preferred age for modification was 16-20 years, but there was very little consensus on the particular prophylactic regime recommended. Approximately, half of a cohort of 218 patients with severe haemophilia successfully reduced or stopped prophylaxis when they reached adolescence. Only 26 of 92 (28%) of the patient cohort who stopped prophylaxis, required reintroduction of a prophylactic regime and 12 of 59 (20%) of those who reduced the intensity of prophylaxis had to reintroduce a more intensive regime. A majority of respondents would consider starting prophylaxis in those over 50 years. There was no consensus as to indications for this practice or the nature of the prophylaxis protocol. We conclude that there is an absence of consensus on the management of patients with severe haemophilia, as they pass through adolescence and young adulthood, and reach the age of 50. Aggregate outcome data suggest a significant proportion of patients in the 18-22 years age range may be able to reduce or stop prophylaxis. A substantial number of older patients are on prophylaxis.

Aim: The study aims to describe the course of HIV-1 infection in the pre- and post-HAART period in a cohort of HIV+ haemophilia patients followed up for up to 21 years., Methods: The cohort includes 158 haemophilic men with known seroconversion dates followed up prospectively for a median time of 12 and 5.7 years in the pre- (1980-96) and post-HAART period (1997-2003), respectively., Results: The risk of developing AIDS was lowered by 56% in the post- as compared to the pre-HAART period. Of the 158 patients 69 developed AIDS in the pre-HAART period while of the 59 subjects still alive and AIDS free on 1/1/1997 six developed AIDS. The rate of PCP (12.0 cases per 1000 person-years) and NHL (5.4 cases per 1000 person-years), the most common causes of AIDS diagnosis in the pre-HAART era, were remarkably reduced in the post-HAART era (both rates: 2.8 cases per 1000 person-years). On the contrary, the corresponding risk for non-AIDS deaths was fourfold increased in the post-HAART period. Of the 38 non-AIDS related deaths in both periods, 13 occurred post-HAART. The predominant cause of non-AIDS mortality in both periods was end-stage liver disease (ESLD) (7 pre- and 4 post-HAART). The rate of non-AIDS related cancers was also increased during the post-HAART period., Conclusion: In this haemophilia cohort the risk of AIDS has substantially reduced in the post-HAART period, but the rate of non-AIDS mortality tended to increase. Among haemophilia subjects, due to the high rates of HCV/HIV coinfection, ESLD, the predominant cause of non-AIDS mortality, will become an increasingly important clinical problem.

Our objective was to assess the influence of genetic factors such as HLA classes I and II antigens and other clinical and laboratory variables on the progression of HIV disease in a cohort of 118 HIV infected haemophilic subjects of Greek origin who had been typed for HLA antigens and were followed up prospectively for 22 years since seroconversion. At the end of the follow up we compared two groups of patients: 22 patients who had a fast progression to AIDS (median 6 years since seroconversion) vs. 33 patients who remained asymptomatic in stage A2 for up to 22 years (median 15 years). The results showed that the two groups did not differ significantly in age at seroconversion or baseline CD4+ T cell count. However there was a difference in the frequencies of certain HLA antigens in the two groups. The fast progressors had a higher frequency of HLA-A28, B21 and DR3, which was statistically significant (P = 0.02, 0.04, 0.05, respectively) compared to the slow progressors. These findings based on classical HLA typing techniques confirm other published observations and support the effect of genetic background in the progression of HIV infection in haemophilics.

Chronic hepatitis C is associated with more severe liver disease in patients coinfected with HIV, but the pathogenic mechanism of this more aggressive course is still unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship of HCV genotype, viral load and epidemiological factors with the histological severity of chronic hepatitis in haemophilia patients with HCV/HIV coinfection, taking into consideration the immune status of the patients. Twenty-one HIV/HCV coinfected haemophilia patients, with mean age +/- SD 35.7 +/- 8.7 years, underwent transcutaneous liver biopsy 6-15 years (median 12 years) after HIV and 6-32 (median 21.5 years) years after HCV infection. Twelve patients were stage A (CDC), six stage B and three stage C. CD4 cells were < 50 microL(-1) in three patients (14.3%), 50-200 in 11(52.4%) and > 200 in 7(33.3%). Mean +/- SD log(10) HCV-RNA was 6.87 +/- 0.7 copies mL(-1) (range 5.4-7.9), and mean +/- SD log(10) HIV-RNA was 3.75 +/- 0.98 copies mL(-1) (range 2.7-6), at the time of liver biopsy. Minimal hepatitis was diagnosed in five patients (24%), mild in 10 (48%) and moderate in six (28%). Hepatitis stage 0-2 was found in seven cases (33%) and cirrhosis in six (29%). Statistical analysis showed a significant association of CD4 count < 50 with minimal hepatitis and of CD > 200 with mild and moderate hepatitis (P = 0.033). In addition, minimal hepatitis was found only in patients with stage C, while the majority of subjects with HIV stage A showed mild and moderate hepatitis (P = 0.003). Moreover genotype 1 was independently associated with advanced hepatitis stage (P = 0.04). No relationship was found between hepatitis severity, HIV or HCV RNA levels, patient's age and duration of HIV or HCV infection. Our results suggest that HCV/HIV coinfection may aggravate the course of hepatitis in the phase of immunocompetence, most probably through an immune mediated process. Genotype 1 seems to be associated with advanced liver disease.

HIV-related bone marrow changes are consistent with myelodysplastic features (MDF). Their pathogenesis may differ from primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and is associated with various factors including the virus itself or the antiretroviral therapy. In order to evaluate the differences between HIV-related MDF and MDS, the morphological changes in peripheral blood and bone marrow, cytogenetic analysis and the response to anaemia treatment were studied in 158 HIV+ patients with haemophilia and the results were compared with those of 61 patients with primary MDS (31 with RA, 10 with RARS, 11 with RAEB, three with RAEB-t and six with CMML). The eligibility criteria for patients with MDS were primary MDS, Hb levels < 10 g dL(-1), and no significant organ disease. The peripheral blood and bone marrow examination revealed MDF in 44 HIV-infected haemophilic patients (27.8%). The median time from seroconversion was 12.5 years and the mean time under AZT therapy was 44.1 months. Nineteen of these patients (43.1%) had Hb levels < 10 g dL(-1), while neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 29.5% and 25%, respectively. Every patient of this study with Hb < 10 g dL(-1) received erythropoietin (Epo). There were statistically significant morphological alterations between HIV-related MDF and MDS: hypocellularity, plasmatocytosis and eosinophilia were more pronounced in HIV haemophiliacs with MDF, while dysplasia of erythroblasts, megakaryocytes and granulocytes was more frequent in MDS patients. No HIV haemophilic patient with MDF had more than 5% blasts in the bone marrow nor did any develop RAEB or acute leukaemia during the period of this study. The cytogenetic analysis was normal in HIV-infected patients with haemophilia whereas 42.6% of patients with MDS had an abnormal karyotype. Complete erythroid response was achieved with Epo administration in 84.2% of HIV+ haemophilic patients with anaemia compared to 19.7% of patients with MDS. These data suggest that bone marrow changes in long-term HIV patients have different characteristics from primary MDS and constitute the entity for which the name HIV-myelopathy has been proposed in the literature.