Search

Introduction: Hemostatic prophylaxis (HP) is recommended for patients with bleeding disorders (PWBD) before invasive procedures. However, evidence-based guidelines are needed to determine optimal HP strategies., Aim: To determine outcomes of HP for PWBD undergoing colonoscopy., Methods: We undertook a retrospective cohort study of HP and outcomes of colonoscopy procedures performed between 9 November 1993 and 13 February 2018 for PWBD who received care in the Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Hemophilia Treatment Center., Results: During the study period, 73 PWBD (58 with milder phenotypes: haemophilia, von Willebrand disease [subtypes 1 and 2; II, VII and XI deficiency]) underwent 141 procedures. Preprocedural HP was given to 61%, and interventions were performed in 47%. Of the 39% without preprocedural HP, postprocedural HP was given for 11%. One major (0.7%; 6 days postprocedure despite HP) and 10 minor (7%) bleeding complications occurred, which tended to be in patients with severe disease and/or after excision of larger polyps. There was no significant difference in the rate of bleeding complications with or without preprocedural HP (8.1% vs 5.5%, respectively; P = .74, Fisher's exact test)., Conclusion: The low bleeding rates in our cohort suggest that preprocedure HP may be withheld for patients with mild bleeding disorders who undergo colonoscopy with a low likelihood of requiring an intervention or who require only low-risk intervention. This strategy may be best used in experienced centres, provided optimal local hemostasis measures are undertaken and postprocedural HP is rapidly available if high-risk intervention is required. Further studies are needed to determine optimal evidence-based HP strategies for PWBD undergoing colonoscopy., (© 2020 The Authors. Haemophilia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Haemostatic assessments of patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) who undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) have mainly relied on subjective parameters., Aims: To compare objective haemostatic outcomes of TKA/THA in VWD patients and controls without bleeding disorders., Methods: We retrospectively analysed haemostatic outcomes in VWD patients undergoing TKA/THA from 1993 to 2011 and compared them with two matched controls per operation. Using one-way analysis of variance, we tested the effect of VWD on bleeding risk after TKA and THA., Results: Twelve VWD patients (6 type 1, 3 type 2M, 1 each of types 2A/2B/3) undergoing 19 operations (12 TKA, 7 THA) were matched to 38 controls. One (5%) of 19 operations in VWD patients and none of the control operations met clinical criteria for major bleeding. Baseline and postoperative day 1 haemoglobin levels, postoperative blood loss, transfused red blood cells (RBCs) and mean hospitalization days were not significantly different. More VWD patients than controls received RBC transfusions [12 (63%) vs. 12 (32%)]. Only 9 (47%) VWD patients vs. 38 (100%) controls received pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. No postoperative symptomatic VTE occurred in either group., Conclusion: In this largest, single-institutional study, von Willebrand factor replacement based on daily levels resulted in low frequency of major bleeding in VWD patients after TKA/THA. RBC transfusion was more frequent compared with matched controls, but other objective measures of haemostasis were similar. Lack of sufficient details in published reports precluded comparison of haemostatic outcomes., (© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The ability of von Willebrand factor (VWF) to bind platelet GP Ib and promote platelet plug formation is measured in vitro using the ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) assay. Automated assay systems make testing more accessible for diagnosis, but do not necessarily improve sensitivity and accuracy., Objective: We assessed the performance of a modified automated VWF:RCo assay protocol for the Behring Coagulation System (BCS(®) ) compared to other available assay methods., Methods: Results from different VWF:RCo assays in a number of specialized commercial and research testing laboratories were compared using plasma samples with varying VWF:RCo activities (0-1.2 IU mL(-1) ). Samples were prepared by mixing VWF concentrate or plasma standard into VWF-depleted plasma. Commercially available lyophilized standard human plasma was also studied. Emphasis was put on the low measuring range. VWF:RCo accuracy was calculated based on the expected values, whereas precision was obtained from repeated measurements., Results: In the physiological concentration range, most of the automated tests resulted in acceptable accuracy, with varying reproducibility dependent on the method. However, several assays were inaccurate in the low measuring range. Only the modified BCS protocol showed acceptable accuracy over the entire measuring range with improved reproducibility., Conclusions: A modified BCS(®) VWF:RCo method can improve sensitivity and thus enhances the measuring range. Furthermore, the modified BCS(®) assay displayed good precision. This study indicates that the specific modifications - namely the combination of increased ristocetin concentration, reduced platelet content, VWF-depleted plasma as on-board diluent and a two-curve calculation mode - reduces the issues seen with current VWF:RCo activity assays., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. Treatment guidelines recommend the use of von Willebrand factor/factor VIII (VWF/FVIII) concentrate for VWD patients with type 2 or 3 VWD undergoing surgery, and type 1 patients undergoing surgery who are unresponsive, or for whom desmopressin acetate is contraindicated. This prospective, open-label, multinational study evaluated the safety, efficacy and optimal dosing of a VWF/FVIII concentrate (Humate-P) in subjects with VWD undergoing elective surgery. Dosing was based on VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) and FVIII pharmacokinetic assessments performed before surgery. Pharmacokinetic assessments were completed in 33 adults and 9 children. Haemostatic efficacy was assessed on a 4-point scale (excellent, good, moderate/poor or none). Overall effective haemostasis was achieved in 32/35 subjects. Median terminal VWF:RCo half-life was 11.7 h, and median incremental in vivo recovery was 2.4 IU dL(-1) per IU kg(-1) infused. Major haemorrhage occurred after surgery in 3/35 cases despite achieving target VWF and FVIII levels. Median VWF/FVIII concentrate loading doses ranged from 42.6 IU VWF:RCo kg(-1) (oral surgery) to 61.2 IU VWF:RCo kg(-1) (major surgery), with a median of 10 (range, 2-55) doses administered per subject. Adverse events considered possibly treatment-related (n = 6) were generally mild and of short duration. The results indicate that this VWF/FVIII concentrate is safe and effective in the prevention of excessive bleeding during and after surgery in individuals with VWD., (© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Optimal doses of von Willebrand Factor/Factor VIII (VWF/FVIII) concentrates for surgical procedures in patients with VWD need to be determined. A prospective, multicenter study was performed that included an initial pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment following a standard dose of VWF/FVIII concentrate (Humate-P®) to determine individual PK parameters and guide therapeutic dosing during surgery. Forty one subjects received 60 IU kg⁻¹ VWF: RCo. Median plasma levels, half-life, mean change from baseline and in vivo recovery (IVR) values were determined for VWF:RCo, VWF:Ag, and FVIII: C, and area under the plasma time-concentration curve (AUC), mean residence time (MRT), clearance, volume of distribution and dose linearity were also assessed for VWF:RCo at various time points. Median baseline VWF:RCo level was 13 IU dL⁻¹ (range, 6-124); with a mean change from baseline >100 IU dL⁻¹ immediately after the infusion, decreasing to 10 IU dL⁻¹ at 48 h postinfusion. The group median incremental in vivo recovery (IVR) for VWF:RCo was 2.4 IU dL⁻¹ per IU kg⁻¹, for VWF:Ag 2.3 IU dL⁻¹ kg⁻¹ and for FVIII:C was 2.7 IU dL⁻¹ per IU kg⁻¹. When analysing individual recovery values on repeated infusions, a very weak correlation was observed between presurgery IVR and IVR for both VWF:RCo and FVIII, measured at various times just prior to and after the surgical procedure. Although group median values were fairly consistent among repeated IVR measurements, the intra-individual IVR values for FVIII and VWF:RCo with repeated infusions showed a large degree of variability. IVR values obtained from pharmacokinetic analyses performed in advance of anticipated surgery do not reliably predict postinfusion circulating levels of VWF:RCo or FVIII attained preoperatively or with subsequent peri-operative infusions., (© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a commonly encountered inherited bleeding disorder affecting both males and females, causing mucous membrane and skin bleeding symptoms, and bleeding with surgical or other haemostatic challenges. VWD may be disproportionately symptomatic in women of child-bearing age. It may also occur less frequently as an acquired disorder (acquired von Willebrand syndrome). VWD is caused by deficiency or dysfunction of von Willebrand factor (VWF), a plasma protein that mediates platelet haemostatic function and stabilizes blood coagulation factor VIII. The pathophysiology, classification, diagnosis and management of VWD are relatively complex, but understanding them is important for proper diagnosis and management of patients with VWD. These evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management of VWD from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Expert Panel (USA) review relevant publications, summarize current understanding of VWD pathophysiology and classification, and present consensus diagnostic and management recommendations based on analysis of the literature and expert opinion. They also suggest an approach for clinical and laboratory evaluation of individuals with bleeding symptoms, history of bleeding or conditions associated with increased bleeding risk. This document summarizes needs for further research in VWF, VWD and bleeding disorders, including clinical research to obtain more objective information about bleeding symptoms, advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic tools, and enhancement in the education and training of clinicians and scientists in bleeding and thrombotic disorders. The NHLBI Web site (http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/vwd) has a more detailed document, a synopsis of these recommendations, and patient education information.

We describe the experience of a single medical centre with continuous factor VIII (FVIII) infusion therapy in a cohort of patients undergoing elective surgery. Twenty-eight patients had a total of 45 procedures. Intraoperative haemostasis was considered excellent in all 45 cases. FVIII levels were maintained between 46% and 191% of normal (median, 103%) for 2-7 days. Bleeding occurred after five procedures (11%) at times when factor VIII levels were within haemostatic range. No patient required reoperation to control bleeding. There were no cases of sepsis related to continuous infusion of factor VIII. We conclude that continuous infusion: (1) is a safe and effective means of replacement therapy in patients with haemophilia undergoing surgery; (2) provides easier monitoring and more constant coagulation factor levels; and (3) has the potential to decrease the cost of replacement therapy by reducing overall usage of product.

We describe a patient with mild haemophilia B who developed symptomatic venous thromboembolism after hip arthroplasty for a traumatic fracture. A deep vein thrombosis developed in the operated leg while he was receiving a high-purity factor IX concentrate. Subsequently, he was determined to be a heterozygous carrier for the factor V Arg506Gln (Leiden) mutation. This case illustrates the importance of providing thromboprophylaxis for all patients with haemophilia receiving coagulation factor replacement and who undergo surgical procedures known to be associated with a high risk of venous thromboembolism. In patients with haemophilia and a family history of venous thromboembolism, preoperative screening for the presence of the factor V Arg506Gln mutation and other thrombophilias may be useful.