Search

Introduction Complex Regional Pain Syndrome is a condition with a high degree of morbidity and health costs to the National Health Service (NHS), characterised by persistent pain, sensory, motor, trophic and autonomic signs and symptoms. The British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) and the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) have recommended treatment guidelines and care pathways for the management of acute Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. The objective of this scoping exercise was to use Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to ascertain whether NHS Trusts in England had such pathways and what they looked like. Methods FOI requests were sent to 126 English NHS Trusts on 9 March 2017 on behalf of the Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Clinical and Research Network UK, asking: “What does your acute Complex Regional Pain Care Syndrome pathway look like?” Results Replies were received by 95 NHS Trusts and of these 84 had relevant services but (82%) had no pathway or agreed initial management. Conclusions It appears to be common for no acute care pathway to exist for CRPS in NHS Trusts in England despite it being a domain in BOA national guidelines. The Royal College of Physicians guidelines also recommend integrated MDT care. Consequentially, BOA and Royal College of Physicians standards in acute CRPS management are not yet being followed in most acute NHS Trusts in England providing trauma care. Where there is a pathway agreed, it is rarely integrated and truly multidisciplinary.

Introduction Complex regional pain syndrome is a multifaceted condition, which is relatively common after distal radius fracture. Method A series of audits and service evaluations were conducted from 2004 to 2013 to investigate the incidence of complex regional pain syndrome type I and any correlation to tight, restrictive, over-flexed casts. Simple subsequent clinical and patient management changes were implemented and impact re-evaluated. Results These audits have contributed to organisational learning and a subsequent reduction in the incidence of complex regional pain syndrome type I in non-operatively managed distal radius fracture from 25%, in keeping with expected incidence in the relevant literature, to a rare event (Conclusion The authors suggest that careful attention to the prevention of complex regional pain syndrome through staff and patient awareness, vigilance for warning signs and minor modifications to the traditional management of distal radius fractures can significantly reduce the incidence of complex regional pain syndrome type I after distal radius fracture.