Search

Objective: Our primary outcome was to determine the feasibility of patients with post-traumatic headache (PTH) keeping a daily headache diary and using sumatriptan as directed. Secondary outcomes include determining if sumatriptan is effective in aborting PTH and whether headache resolution is dependent on PTH phenotype., Background: PTH is prevalent and persistent after traumatic brain injury, yet there have been few studies evaluating the effects of pharmacological treatments in individuals with PTH., Methods: This is a single-arm, prospective, non-randomized phase 2 clinical trial registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01854385) and conducted from 2013 to 2017. Data analysis was completed in 2022. Of the 299 participants screened, 40 were enrolled in the study. Participants kept a headache diary documenting headache characteristics and severity. Headache characteristics were used to determine PTH phenotypes of migraine-like, probable migraine-like, or non-migraine-like. Participants reported whether sumatriptan was used for their headache, their response to the medication, if a second dose was taken, and their response to the second dose., Results: A total of 15 participants out of the 40 enrolled (mean [SD] age, 41.9 [14.2] years, and 53% [21/40] male), met the criteria for the use of sumatriptan, and completed all assessments. Average headache diary compliance rate for the final month of the study was 80% (372/465). While sumatriptan was used for only 19% (122/654) of all reported headaches, 72% (88/122) of those headaches resolved within 2 h of taking the medication. Resolution of headaches with sumatriptan was not significantly different among headache phenotypes (migraine-like: 22/38 [58%], probable migraine-like: 24/29 [83%], non-migraine-like: 6/15 [40%]; p = 0.154)., Conclusions: A daily headache diary is feasible for tracking headache symptoms. Preliminary results also suggest that sumatriptan, a migraine-specific medication, may be beneficial for the treatment of PTH of different clinical phenotypes. Future studies, such as a phase 3 clinical trial with a larger sample size, are needed to better understand the efficacy of sumatriptan in the treatment of PTH., (© 2024 American Headache Society.)

Objective: To describe patient self-report of headache treatment in the first year following mild traumatic brain injury (TBI)., Background: An understanding of appropriate management of symptoms after mild TBI is crucial for improving acute care and long-term outcomes. This is particularly true for post-traumatic headaches as recent studies suggest that headaches after mild TBI are common with multiple phenotypes. In addition, symptoms such as headache after mild TBI are often managed by primary care providers without specialty training, and often in medically underserved areas. Outside of previous opinion papers, few studies have guided the treatment or examined the effectiveness of the interventions for post-traumatic headache., Methods: One hundred sixty-seven participants admitted to a level 1 trauma hospital with mild TBI who were prospectively enrolled and reported new or worse headache at 3, 6, or 12 months after injury., Results: Participants were primarily male (75%), white (75%), injured in vehicle crashes (62%), and had completed high school (83%). The majority of headaches met International Classification of Headache Disorders-2nd edition criteria for migraine/probable migraine, followed by tension-type headache. Despite the diverse nature of headaches, more than 70% of those with headache at each time period used acetaminophen or a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug for headache control. Only 8% of those with the migraine/probable migraine phenotype used triptans. Of those individuals who used medication, 26% of those with migraine/probable migraine phenotype and 70% of those with tension headache phenotype endorsed complete relief (vs partial or no relief) because of medication use. The majority of individuals with tension headache reported never taking medication., Conclusions: Headaches after mild TBI are frequent and are not optimally treated. Results suggest that many individuals with mild TBI may be self-treating their headaches by utilizing over-the-counter pain relief medications. These medications, however, are only providing effective treatment for a minority of this population. Further research must be conducted to develop evidence-guided treatment and educate providers.

Background: he effectiveness of medical therapies for chronic post-traumatic headaches (PTHs) attributable to mild head trauma in military troops has not been established., Objective: To determine the treatment outcomes of acute and prophylactic medical therapies prescribed for chronic PTHs after mild head trauma in US Army soldiers., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with 100 soldiers undergoing treatment for chronic PTH at a single US Army neurology clinic. Headache frequency and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores were determined at the initial clinic visit and then again by phone 3 months after starting headache prophylactic medication. Response rates of headache abortive medications were also determined. Treatment outcomes were compared between subjects with blast-related PTH and non-blast PTH., Results: Ninety-nine of 100 subjects were male. Seventy-seven of 100 subjects had blast PTH and 23/100 subjects had non-blast PTH. Headache characteristics were similar for blast PTH and non-blast PTH with 96% and 95%, respectively, resembling migraine. Headache frequency among all PTH subjects decreased from 17.1 days/month at baseline to 14.5 days/month at follow-up (P = .009). Headache frequency decreased by 41% among non-blast PTH compared to 9% among blast PTH. Fifty-seven percent of non-blast PTH subjects had a 50% or greater decline in headache frequency compared to 29% of blast PTH subjects (P =.023). A significant decline in headache frequency occurred in subjects treated with topiramate (n = 29, -23%, P = .02) but not among those treated with a low-dose tricyclic antidepressant (n = 48, -12%, P = .23). Seventy percent of PTH subjects who used a triptan class medication experienced reliable headache relief within 2 hours compared to 42% of subjects using other headache abortive medications (P = .01). Triptan medications were effective for both blast PTH and non-blast PTH (66% response rate vs 86% response rate, respectively; P = .20). Headache-related disability, as measured by mean MIDAS scores, declined by 57% among all PTH subjects with no significant difference between blast PTH (-56%) and non-blast PTH (-61%)., Conclusions: Triptan class medications are usually effective for aborting headaches in military troops with chronic PTH attributed to a concussion from a blast injury or non-blast injury. Topiramate appears to be an effective headache prophylactic therapy in military troops with chronic PTH, whereas low doses of tricyclic antidepressants appear to have little efficacy. Chronic PTH triggered by a blast injury may be less responsive to commonly prescribed headache prophylactic medications compared to non-blast PTH. These conclusions require validation by prospective, controlled clinical trials., (© 2011 American Headache Society.)

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of upper cervical facet joint injections and spinal rami blocks in the treatment of cervicogenic headache., Background: Cervicogenic headache has been recognized as a common and often disabling disorder. The treatment of this headache type remains challenging., Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 31 patients with refractory cervicogenic headache who underwent fluoroscopically guided C(1/2), C(2/3) facet joint injections and C(2), C(3) spinal rami blocks using a mixture of 0.25% bupivacaine and 3 mg betamehtasone. The outcome measures were the change in headache severity, assessed using an 11-point numerical pain scale, after treatment, and the duration of head pain relief., Results: Twenty-eight (90.3%) patients experienced >50% headache relief after treatment, with an average duration of 21.7 (1-90) days. Mean (+/-SD) head pain intensity decreased from 7.5 +/- 1.3 before treatment to 2.7 +/- 1.9 immediately after it (P < .0001). The procedures were well tolerated., Conclusions: C(1/2), C(2/3) facet joint injections and C(2), C(3) spinal rami blocks were effective and well tolerated for the treatment of cervicogenic headache in this study. The procedures provided significant and prolonged pain relief in the majority of patients. Larger controlled studies are needed to further evaluate the efficacy of this treatment modality in cervicogenic headache.