1. Participatory implementation research in the field of migrant health: Sustainable changes and ripple effects over time
- Author
-
Anne MacFarlane, Michelle A. E. Brouwer, Christos Lionis, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Christopher Dowrick, Joseph W. LeMaster, Mohammed Hussain, Parmida Shahiri, and M Papadakaki
- Subjects
participatory learning and action methods ,lnfectious Diseases and Global Health Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [Radboudumc 4] ,Psychological intervention ,Healthcare improvement science Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 18] ,primary care ,03 medical and health sciences ,normalisation process theory ,All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center ,0302 clinical medicine ,migrant health ,Process theory ,Health care ,Humans ,Political climate ,030212 general & internal medicine ,implementation ,Qualitative Research ,Implementation theory ,Transients and Migrants ,lcsh:R5-920 ,Medical education ,Primary Health Care ,business.industry ,lcsh:Public aspects of medicine ,Communication ,030503 health policy & services ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,lcsh:RA1-1270 ,patient and public involvement ,Focus group ,Original Research Paper ,Emic and etic ,Implementation research ,lcsh:Medicine (General) ,0305 other medical science ,Psychology ,business ,Original Research Papers ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to explore whether positive impacts were sustained and unanticipated ripple effects had occurred four years after the implementation of interventions to improve cross-cultural communication in primary care. Background: Sustaining the implementation of change using complex interventions is challenging. The EU-funded "RESTORE" study implemented guidelines and training on cross-cultural communication in five Primary Care sites in Europe, combining implementation theory (Normalisation Process Theory) with participatory methodology (participatory learning and action-PLA). There were positive impacts on knowledge, skills and clinical routines. Design, setting and participants: Four of the five original sites (England, Ireland, Greece, The Netherlands) were available for this qualitative follow-up study. The study population (N = 44) was primary healthcare staff and migrants, most of whom had participated in RESTORE. INTERVENTION; MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: PLA-style focus groups and interviews explored routine practice during consultations with migrants. Etic cards based on the effects of RESTORE stimulated the discussion. Deductive framework analysis was performed in each country followed by comparative data analysis and synthesis. Results: Changes in knowledge, attitudes and behaviour with regard to consultations with migrants were sustained and migrants felt empowered by their participation in RESTORE. There were ongoing concerns about macro level factors, like the political climate and financial policies, negatively affecting migrant healthcare. Conclusion: There were sustained effects in clinical settings, and additional unanticipated positive ripple effects, due in part, from the participatory approach employed.
- Published
- 2020