1. Death, working-class culture and social distinction.
- Author
-
Conway, Steve
- Subjects
DEATH & psychology ,PSYCHOLOGICAL adaptation ,ATTITUDE (Psychology) ,INTERMENT ,CONCEPTS ,GROUP identity ,RESOURCE allocation ,SELF-perception ,SOCIAL classes ,SOCIAL skills ,STEREOTYPES ,SUFFERING ,SOCIAL capital ,CULTURAL values ,ATTITUDES toward death - Abstract
Following Howarth (2007), this paper examines the relationship between class culture and social distinction in the empirical area of death and dying. For Howarth (2007), the sociological neglect of the end-of-life cultural practices of working-class people carries the danger 'of privileging middle-class agendas for change, [t]here is an urgent need for further studies and a refinement of existing research to draw out social class distinctions' (p. 433). Drawing on Howarth (2007), and Bourdieu (1984), it is argued below that the connexion between death and class reflects and helps to reproduce class-based identities, advantages and conflicts. Whilst class culture can be a supportive resource for working-class people, for example, in ways which reflect solidarity, more typically the classed nature of death brings acute suffering. Relatedly, it is proposed that stereotypes of declining respectability are reflected in some middle-class conceptions of working-class practices and identity connected to death. Such thinking socially positions working-class tastes as objects of disgust, and working-class people as disgusting subjects. It is concluded that, whilst Howarth's call is much warranted, the debate also needs to problematise the normalisation of middle-class ways to die and grieve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF