Search

The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of recording vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) using simultaneous binaural acoustic stimulation (B-VEMP), and compare it with that using monaural acoustic stimulation (M-VEMP). Seven healthy volunteers were evoked by initial B-VEMP test and subsequent M-VEMP test, whereas vice versa in another 7 volunteers. All 14 subjects demonstrated both B-VEMPs and M-VEMPs, without significant difference in the latencies of p13 and n23. When using interaural amplitude difference (IAD) ratio for interpreting amplitude, B-VEMPs did not differ significantly from that of M-VEMPs. Hence, B-VEMPs can produce information equivalent to M-VEMPs in terms of response rate, latencies, and IAD ratio in healthy subjects. Likewise, similar results were also shown in the patients with unilateral Meniere’s disease. In conclusion, B-VEMPs provide neither different information nor less variability, as compared with M-VEMPs. In addition, B-VEMPs can offer information on unilateral inner ear (saccular) pathology similar to that by M-VEMPs. Furthermore, recording from binaural stimulation can be used as a possibly more convenient mode compared with two monaural recordings, especially when testing young or old or disabled patients, since a continuous muscular effort is required during recording. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]