Search

AVE0118, an inhibitor of I Kur , I to and I K,ACh , was in the drug pipeline for atrial fibrillation. To investigate the limitation of AVE0118 as an anti-atrial fibrillatory drug, we studied its electropharmacological effects particularly focusing on the anti-atrial fibrillatory action as reverse translational research. We adopted the chronic atrioventricular block beagle dogs (n = 4), having a pathophysiology of bradycardia-associated, volume overload-induced chronic heart failure, in which the atrial fibrillation was induced by 10 s of burst pacing on atrial septum. AVE0118 in doses of 0.24 and 1.2 mg/kg, i.v. over 10 min hardly altered electrophysiological variables. Meanwhile, AVE0118 in a dose of 6 mg/kg, i.v. over 10 min delayed the inter-atrial conduction in a frequency-dependent manner and prolonged the atrial effective refractory period in a reverse frequency-dependent manner, whereas it did not significantly alter the duration of atrial fibrillation or its cycle length. The increment of atrial effective refractory period was 3.3 times greater compared with that of ventricular one at a basic cycle length of 400 ms. Torsade de pointes was not induced during the experimental period. Thus, AVE0118 may possess a favorable cardiac safety pharmacological profile, but its weak anti-atrial fibrillatory effect would indicate the limitation of atrial repolarization-delaying agents for suppressing atrial fibrillation.

We have shown that a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor suppresses atrial remodeling in a canine atrial fibrillation (AF) model. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is increased by DPP-4 inhibitors. However, it is not clear whether GLP-1 is involved in the suppression of atrial remodeling. In this study, we evaluated the effect of liraglutide (a GLP-1 analog) on atrial electrophysiological changes using the same canine AF model. We established a canine AF model using continuous 3-week rapid atrial stimulation in seven beagle dogs divided into two groups: a liraglutide group with four dogs (3-week atrial pacing with liraglutide (150 µg/kg/day) administration) and a pacing control group with three dogs (3-week pacing without any medicine). We evaluated the atrial effective refractory period (AERP), conduction velocity (CV), and AF inducibility every week during the protocol using implanted epicardial wires against the surfaces of both atria. In the pacing control group, the AERP was gradually shortened and the CV was decreased along the time course. In the liraglutide group, the AERP was similarly shortened as in the pacing control group (94 ± 4% versus 85 ± 2%, respectively; p = 0.5926), but the CV became significantly higher than that in the pacing control group after 2 and 3 weeks (95 ± 4 versus 83 ± 5%, respectively; p = 0.0339). The AF inducibility was gradually increased in the pacing control group, but it was suppressed in the liraglutide group (5 ± 9% versus 73 ± 5%; p = 0.0262). Liraglutide suppressed electrophysiological changes such as AF inducibility and CV decrease in our canine AF model.

Coagulation factor Xa activates the protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR2) and causes tissue fibrosis; however, the effects of Xa inhibitor edoxaban on atrial fibrosis and atrial fibrillation (AF) have not been investigated. We examined the effect of edoxaban on the progression of atrial fibrosis in a canine congestive heart failure (CHF) model. Beagle dogs were assigned to sham, placebo, and edoxaban groups (n = 6/group). Dogs of the placebo or edoxaban groups received 19 days of medication with daily oral placebo or edoxaban, respectively, followed by 14 days of ventricular tachypacing. Dogs of the sham group had no medication or pacing. Ventricular tachypacing prolonged AF duration in dogs of the placebo group (159 ± 41 s, p < 0.01 vs. sham); however, this effect was suppressed by edoxaban treatment. Compared with the sham group, tachypacing alone also significantly increased the atrial fibrotic area (2.9 ± 0.1% vs. 7.8 ± 0.4%, p < 0.01), PAR2 expression (1.0 ± 0.1 vs. 1.8 ± 0.3, p < 0.05), and atrial fibronectin expression (1.0 ± 0.2 vs. 2.0 ± 0.2, p < 0.01). These responses were suppressed by edoxaban treatment (area 5.9 ± 0.4%, p < 0.01; PAR2 1.1 ± 0.1, p < 0.05; fibronectin 1.2 ± 0.2, p < 0.05 vs. placebo). Edoxaban showed suppressive effects on atrial remodeling, AF progression, and excessive expressions of PAR2 and fibronectin in a canine CHF model. The suppression of the Xa/PAR2 pathway might be a potential pharmacological target of edoxaban.

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors have recently been reported to exhibit additional cardioprotective effects; however, their effect in atrial remodeling, such as in atrial fibrillation (AF), remains unclear. In this study, the effect of linagliptin on atrial electrical and structural remodeling was evaluated in a canine AF model. Sixteen beagle dogs with 3-week atrial rapid stimulation were divided into the linagliptin group (9 mg/kg/day, n = 8) and pacing control group (n = 8). Three additional dogs without rapid pacing were assigned into non-pacing group, which was used as sham in this study. In the dogs with rapid pacing, the atrial effective refractory period (AERP), conduction velocity (CV), and AF inducibility were evaluated and blood was sampled every week. After the entire protocol, atrial tissue was sampled for histological examinations using HE, Azan, and dihydroethidium (DHE) staining to evaluate any tissue damage or oxidative stress. The pacing control group exhibited a gradual AERP shortening and CV decrease along the time course as previously reported. In the linagliptin group, the AERP shortening was not affected, but the CV decrease was suppressed in comparison to the control group (p < 0.05). The AF inducibility was increased in the control group and suppressed in the linagliptin group (p < 0.05). The control group exhibited tissue fibrosis, the degree of which was suppressed in the linagliptin group. DHE staining exhibited suppression of the reactive oxygen species expression in the linagliptin group in comparison to the pacing control group. Linagliptin, a DPP-4-inhibitor, suppressed the AF inducibility, CV decrease, and overexpression of oxidative stress in the canine AF model. Such suppressive effects of linagliptin on AF in the canine model may possibly be related to the anti-oxidative effect.

Effects of an angiotensin II receptor blocker, irbesartan (IRB), on the development of atrial fibrosis and atrial fibrillation (AF) were assessed in a canine model of atrial tachycardia remodeling (ATR) with left ventricular dysfunction, together with its possible association with involvement of p53. Atrial tachypacing (400 bpm for 4 weeks) was used to induce ATR in beagles treated with placebo (ATR-dogs, n = 6) or irbesartan (IRB-dogs, n = 5). Non-paced sham dogs served as control (Control-dogs, n = 4). ATR- and IRB-dogs developed tachycardia-induced left ventricular dysfunction. Atrial effective refractory period (AERP) shortened (83 ± 5 ms, p < 0.05), inter-atrial conduction time prolonged (72 ± 2 ms, p < 0.05), and AF duration increased (29 ± 5 s, p < 0.05 vs. baseline) after 4 weeks in ATR-dogs. ATR-dogs also had a larger area of atrial fibrous tissue (5.2 ± 0.5 %, p < 0.05 vs. Control). All these changes, except for AERP, were attenuated in IRB-dogs (92 ± 3 ms, 56 ± 3 ms, 9 ± 5 s, and 2.5 ± 0.7 %, respectively; p < 0.05 vs. ATR for each). In ATR-dogs, p53 expression in the left atrium decreased by 42 % compared with Control-dogs (p < 0.05); however, it was highly expressed in IRB-dogs (+89 % vs. ATR). Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 expression was enhanced in ATR-dogs (p < 0.05 vs. Control) but reduced in IRB-dogs (p < 0.05 vs. ATR). Irbesartan suppresses atrial fibrosis and AF development in a canine ATR model with left ventricular dysfunction in association with p53.

Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction is associated with hypertension and hyperuricemia. However, it is not clear whether the L- and N-type calcium channel blocker will improve LV diastolic dysfunction through the reduction of uric acid. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of anti-hypertensive therapy, the L- and N-type calcium channel blocker, cilnidipine or the L-type calcium channel blocker, amlodipine, on left atrial reverse remodeling and uric acid in hypertensive patients. We studied 62 patients with untreated hypertension, randomly assigned to cilnidipine or amlodipine for 48 weeks. LV diastolic function was assessed with the left atrial volume index (LAVI), mitral early diastolic wave (E), tissue Doppler early diastolic velocity (E') and the ratio (E/E'). Serum uric acid levels were measured before and after treatment. After treatment, systolic and diastolic blood pressures equally dropped in both groups. LAVI, E/E', heart rate and uric acid levels decreased at 48 weeks in the cilnidipine group but not in the amlodipine group. The % change from baseline to 48 weeks in LAVI, E wave, E/E' and uric acid levels were significantly lower in the cilnidipine group than in the amlodipine group. Larger %-drop in uric acid levels were associated with larger %-reduction of LAVI (p < 0.01). L- and N-type calcium channel blocker but not L-type calcium channel blocker may improve LV diastolic function in hypertensive patients, at least partially through the decrease in uric acid levels.