1. Pulsed field ablation in the elderly by a pentaspline multielectrode catheter: Safety, efficacy, and comparison with cryoballoon and radiofrequency devices.
- Author
-
Nakasone K, Della Rocca DG, Magnocavallo M, Betancur A, Vetta G, Pannone L, Sorgente A, Audiat C, Rodriguez J, Doundoulakis I, Nekic A, Velagić V, Polselli M, Mohanty S, Marcon L, Sieira J, Ströker E, Bala G, Bianchi S, Almorad A, Combes S, Tsiachris D, Sarkozy A, Natale A, Boveda S, Rossi P, de Asmundis C, and Chierchia GB
- Abstract
Background: Catheter ablation is an effective treatment of atrial fibrillation. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a novel energy modality that relies on high-voltage electric fields to achieve cardiac tissue ablation. Data on its efficacy in the elderly are scarce., Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the procedural details and clinical outcomes of PFA in patients >75 years old., Methods: Consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation >75 years old undergoing PFA with the Farapulse system were enrolled at 6 high-volume centers. Procedural details and clinical outcomes were compared with those of patients undergoing second-generation cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA)., Results: Of 983 patients, 221 underwent PFA, 216 CBA, and 546 RFA. Procedure times were shorter with PFA (72 ± 30 minutes) compared with CBA (77 ± 27 minutes) and RFA (99 ± 23 minutes; P < .001). Extra-pulmonary vein ablation was performed in 74.2% PFA, 9.7% CBA, and 42.1% RFA (P < .001). The major complication rate was 1.01% (n = 10) and was not significantly different between groups (1 PFA, 2 CBA, and 7 RFA; P = .578). Minor complications were observed in 1.4% PFA, 5.1% CBA, and 3.5% RFA (P = .093). The 1-year atrial tachyarrhythmia freedom in the propensity score-matched population was 77.2% with PFA, 80.8% with CBA, and 74.9% with RFA; P = .52)., Conclusion: PFA is a safe and effective option for elderly patients, offering the advantage of enabling extra-pulmonary vein ablation without the concern of thermal injury risk., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr de Asmundis received compensation for teaching purposes and proctoring from Medtronic, Abbott, Biotronik, LivaNova, Boston Scientific, AtriCure, Acutus Medical, and Daiichi Sankyo. Dr Chierchia received compensation for teaching purposes and proctoring from Medtronic, Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Acutus Medical. The other authors report no relationships relevant to the contents of this study., (Copyright © 2025 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF