Search

Molecular tests have become an indispensable tool for the diagnosis and prognosis of hematological malignancies and are subject to accreditation according to the International Standard ISO 15189. National standardization of these techniques is essential to ensure that patients throughout France benefit from the same care. We report here on the experience of the GBMHM (Groupe des Biologistes Moléculaires des Hémopathies Malignes). By organizing External Evaluation of Quality (EEQ) programs and training meetings, the GBMHM has contributed to improvement and standardization of molecular tests in 64 French laboratories. A retrospective analysis of the quality-control results of 11 national campaigns spanning 10 years was performed for the 3 most frequently prescribed tests: BCR-ABL1, JAK2 V617F, and lymphoid clonality. For each test, particular attention was placed on comparing methodologies and their evolution throughout the period. The establishment of the BCR-ABL1, JAK2 V617F, and lymphoid clonality EEQ programs and the associated training meetings have initiated a process of collective standardization concerning the methods of implementation (JAK2 V617F) and the interpretation and formulation of results (lymphoid clonality). In addition, it resulted in objective improvement in technical performance (BCR-ABL1). Our evaluation of the impact of these EEQ programs demonstrates that it is possible to obtain reproducible values across different laboratories in France by applying national recommendations. To our knowledge, this is the first publication that evaluates the impact of a national quality assurance program on improving molecular results in hematology.

Abstract. T-cell Receptor Gamma (TRG) rearrangements are commonly used to detect clonal lymphoproliferations in hematopathology, since they are rearranged in virtually all T lymphocytes and have a relatively limited recombinatorial repertoire, which reduces the risk of false negative results, at the cost of potential false positivity. We developed an initial one-tube, 2-fluorochrome EuroClonality TRG PCR multiplex (TRG-1T-2F) which was compared to the original 2-tube, 2-fluorochrome EuroClonality/BIOMED-2 TRG PCR (TRG-2T-2F) and a commercial Invivoscribe one-tube, one-fluorochrome kit (IVS-1T-1F) on a series of 239 samples, including both T-cell malignancies and reactive cases. This initial assay yielded discrepant results between the 10 participating EuroClonality laboratories when using 2 fluorochromes, leading to adoption of a final single color EuroClonality strategy (TRG-1T-1F). Compared to TRG-2T-2F, both TRG-1T-1F and IVS-1T-1F demonstrated easier interpretation and a lower risk of false positive from minor peaks in dispersed repertoires. Both generate smaller fragments and as such are likely to be better adapted to analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples. Their differential performance was mainly explained by (i) superposition of biallelic rearrangements with IVS-1T-1F, due to more extensive overlapping of the repertoires and (ii) intentional omission of the TRGJP primer in TRG-1T-1F, in order to avoid the potential risk of confusion of consensus TRG V9-JP normal rearrangements with a pathological clone.

The objective of this study was to assess the clinical impact and financial costs of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 5 categories of pediatric and adult hematological cancers. NGS prescriptions were prospectively collected from 26 laboratories, with varied technical and reporting practice (all or only significant targets). Impact was defined by the identification of (1) an actionable mutation, (2) a mutation with prognostic and/or theranostic value, and/or (3) a mutation allowing nosological refinement, reported by local investigators. A microcosting study was undertaken in 4 laboratories, identifying the types and volumes of resources required for each procedural step. Individual index prescriptions for 3961 patients were available for impact analysis on the management of myeloid disorders (two thirds) and, mainly mature B, lymphoid disorders (one third). NGS results were considered to impact the management for 73.4% of prescriptions: useful for evaluation of prognostic risk in 34.9% and necessary for treatment adaptation (actionable) in 19.6%, but having no immediate individual therapeutic impact in 18.9%. The average overall cost per sample was 191 € for the restricted mature lymphoid amplicon panel. Capture panel costs varied from 369 € to 513 €. Unit costs varied from 0.5 € to 5.7 € per kb sequenced, from 3.6 € to 11.3 € per target gene/hot-spot sequenced and from 4.3 € to 73.8 € per target gene/hot-spot reported. Comparable costs for the Amplicon panels were 5–8 € per kb and 10.5–14.7 € per target gene/hot-spot sequenced and reported, demonstrating comparable costs with greater informativity/flexibility for capture strategies. Sustainable funding of precision medicine requires a transparent discussion of its impact on care pathways and its financial aspects.

Abstract. As a result of significant recent developments, the management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is changing, and new therapeutic options will continue to emerge in the near future. The recommendations of the French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO-CLL) group presented here are intended to provide practical recommendations for physicians taking care of CLL patients, taking into account the availability of both biological tests and therapies in daily practice in France at the time of publication. This text details the documented information and guidelines on diagnosis, indications for treatment, infectious complications and therapeutic strategies in frontline and relapsed CLL as well as in particular conditions such as autoimmune cytopenia or Richter syndrome.