Search

Rituximab, the first anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has dramatically improved outcomes for patients with B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Obinutuzumab was developed to potentiate activity and overcome resistance to rituximab. Clinical data suggest that obinutuzumab is superior to rituximab in follicular lymphoma (FL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Yet, it has increased toxicity. This systematic review and meta-analysis compiled all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing obinutuzumab-based regimens with rituximab-based regimens to better assess their toxicity profile. Primary outcome was grade 3-4 infections; secondary outcomes included any adverse events (AE), grade 3-4 AE, drug discontinuation rate, and 3-years mortality. Relative risks (RRs) were estimated and pooled using a fixed-effect model, unless there was significant heterogeneity, in which case a random-effects model was used. Our comprehensive search yielded five RCTs conducted between 2009 and 2014, including 4247 patients. The trials included FL patients, CLL and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Monoclonal antibodies were given with different chemotherapy regimens (in four trials) or as monotherapy (in one trial). The point estimate favored increase in both grade 3-4 infections rate (RR 1.17 [95% CI, 1.0-1.36]) and any AE rate (RR 1.05 [95% 1-1.1]) with obinutuzumab, although this was not statistically significant. There was a significantly increased rate of grade 3-4 AE (RR 1.15 [95% CI, 1.09-1.2]), as well as grade 3-4 toxicities including thrombocytopenia (RR 2.8 [95% CI, 1.92-4.06]), infusion related reactions (RR 2.8 [95% CI, 2.16-3.64]) and cardiac events (RR 1.65 [95% CI, 1.11-2.46]). There was no significant difference in grade 3-4 anemia and neutropenia nor in the 3-year mortality rate. The point estimate favored increase in discontinuation rate due to AE with obinutuzumab, although without statistical significance (RR 1.24 [95% CI, 1.0-1.54]). In conclusion, physicians need to weigh the clinical benefits of this agent against higher toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Romidepsin is a class I selective histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for relapsed/refractory (R/R) cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), treated with at least one prior systemic therapy. Currently, there is paucity of real-life data on the efficacy and safety of romidepsin in R/R T-cell lymphoma. This national, multicenter study presents real-life data on the efficacy and safety of romidepsin in R/R T-cell lymphoma. Patients diagnosed and treated with romidepsin for R/R CTCL or PTCL between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), and adverse events. Fifty-three patients with R/R PTCL (n = 42) or CTCL (n = 11) were included. Among CTCL patients, median OS was not reached, ORR was 25%, and none achieved CR. Among PTCL patients, median OS was 7.1 months, EFS was 1.9 months, ORR rate was 33%, and 12.5% achieved CR. In a univariate analysis, predictors for longer EFS include any response to therapy, number of previous lines, and PTCL subclass (with better results for angioimmunobalstic T-cell lymphoma). In a univariate and multivariate analysis for OS, treatment response was the only factor predicting OS (OR 4.48; CI 95%, 1.57-12.79; P = .005). Most grade 3 and 4 adverse events were hematological (35%). Infections were reported in 34% of patients. This real-life experience with romidepsin confirms the results of the pivotal phase II trials. PTCL subtype and the number of previous lines of therapy have an impact on EFS. In addition, patients who had good response to romidepsin benefited most in terms of both EFS and OS. Efforts should be done to identify those patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Randomized trials of maintenance therapy (MT) in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are inconclusive regarding its effect on overall survival (OS) and disease control. We aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of MT in this meta-analysis. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing MT with observation or placebo, in patients with DLBCL, who achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) after first-line chemotherapy with or without rituximab. Primary outcome was OS. Secondary outcomes included relapse rate, disease control (defined as progression-free survival, event-free survival, or disease-free survival, as reported in the original trials), and safety. Our search yielded 14 trials including 5122 patients. Median age of patients was 49 to 70 years. Six trials included rituximab as the MT; three included Interferon alfa; other trials include thalidomide, lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide and prednisone, serine threonine kinase inhibitor enzastaurin, and mTOR inhibitor everolimus. MT did not improve OS compared to observation, OR 0.91, (95% CI 0.78-1.07). Results were the same in a subgroup analysis by the type of maintenance (rituximab vs other). MT did decreased relapse rate, RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.65-0.89) and improved disease control, OR 0.74 (95% CI 0.65-0.84). Disease control was significantly improved in the subgroup of studies evaluating rituximab as maintenance OR 0.61 (95% CI 0.47-0.79) and in the subgroup of R-CHOP induction studies OR 0.77 (95% CI 0.67-0.88). Serious or grade III/IV adverse events including neutropenia and infections were significantly more common in the maintenance arm, RR = 1.69 (95% CI 1.29-2.22). MT in patients with DLBCL achieving CR or PR after induction therapy did not affect OS, yet it decreased relapse rate and improved disease control at the cost of higher infection rate. Our data do not support routine administration of MT in patients with DLBCL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a greater risk of developing both Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-HL than the general population. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is more common than HL in these patients, and diffuse large B cell lymphoma is the most frequent subtype observed. Although the clinical course of lymphoma in RA is often aggressive, the prognosis in these cases is similar to that of lymphoma in the general population. In this review, we summarize data derived from both retrospective and prospective studies, regarding incidence, pathogenesis, and outcome of lymphomas in RA patients and outline the possible mechanisms and hypotheses linking these 2 disorders. Over the years, 3 main theories have been suggested to explain this association. These hypotheses relate to genetic predisposition, persistence of long standing disease activity with continued immune stimulation, and the role of anti-RA therapy given. A common genetic predisposition linking RA and lymphoma has not been established. As for treatment of RA, this includes immunosuppressive antitumor necrosis factor drugs or conventional disease modifying antirheumatic drugs like methotrexate. Neither of these drug categories appears to be associated with a higher risk of lymphoma in RA. The impact of continuing disease activity and immune stimulation appears to be the most significant in lymphomagenesis in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Data in the literature are lacking regarding the infection-related adverse events of bendamustine-containing regimens. Therefore, we aimed to assess this risk. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials including bendamustine-containing regimens and those administered for any lymphoproliferative disorder or plasma cell dyscrasia compared with any other regimens. A comprehensive search was conducted until December 2015. Two reviewers appraised the quality of trials and extracted data. Primary outcomes were any infections, grade 3 to 4 infections; secondary outcomes were grade 3 to 4 neutropenia and grade 3 to 4 lymphopenia. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated and pooled. A fixed-effect model was used to pool data unless there was significant heterogeneity, in which case a random-effects model was used. Nine trials published between 2006 and 2016 and randomizing 2620 patients were included. There was no statistically significant effect for bendamustine on the rate of any infection (RR 1.09 [95% CI, 0.87-1.36]) or on the rate of grade 3 to 4 infections (RR 1.04 [95% CI, 0.64-1.71]). There was no increase in the rate of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia in the bendamustine arm (RR 0.84 [95% CI, 0.63-1.12]). Our systematic review demonstrates no effect of bendamustine on the rate of infections when compared with either alkylating agents or fludarabine. Thus, bendamustine remains a safe therapeutic option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]