Search

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for worsening of gastroesophageal varices (GEVs) and development of portosystemic encephalopathy in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐related cirrhosis during nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) treatment. Methods: One hundred and thirty‐seven patients with HBV‐related cirrhosis were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Findings of portal hemodynamics with computed tomography, liver function, and endoscopic examinations during NA treatment were assessed. Results: Among 137 patients, feeding vessels for GEVs (left gastric vein, posterior gastric vein, and short gastric vein) were present in 56 (41%) patients, and extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (paraesophageal vein, paraumbilicul vein, and splenorenal shunt) were present in 36 (26%) patients at the start of NA treatment. Although NA treatment was successful, significant improvements were not observed in portosystemic collateral vessels 3 years after NA treatment and GEVs were exacerbated in 48 (35%) patients. The cumulative 5‐ and 10‐year exacerbation rate of GEVs was 27% and 50%, respectively. By multivariate analysis, the existence of feeding vessels for GEVs at the start of NA treatment was the independent predictive factor for the exacerbation of GEVs (P < 0.001). Eight patients who had extrahepatic portosystemic shunt at the start of NA treatment developed portosystemic encephalopathy during follow‐up. The 3‐ and 5‐year incidence of that was 5% and 8%, respectively. Conclusions: The presence of portosystemic collateral vessels at the start of NA treatment increases the risk of GEVs worsening and development of portosystemic encephalopathy in patients with HBV‐related cirrhosis, despite improvement of liver function and success in reducing viral loads with NA treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim FibroScan is a tool for the non-invasive diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis. Previous studies have compared liver stiffness to percutaneous liver biopsy findings, but no study has compared liver stiffness to liver resection specimen findings. The aim of this study was to compare FibroScan measurements to resected liver specimen findings. Methods From April 2011 to November 2015, a total of 114 patients with liver tumor and hepatitis C were enrolled. We divided them into two groups, the training set and validation set. Liver stiffness was measured by FibroScan before surgery, and specimens obtained by liver resection were evaluated according to the METAVIR system. Results Using Spearman's rank correlation analysis, a positive correlation between liver stiffness measurement and liver fibrosis stage was observed ( r = 0.786, P ≤ 0.0001). In the training set, the area under receiver operating curves for diagnosis of F ≥ 2 was 0.971 (95% confidence interval, 0.928-1.000; cut-off value, 5.9), for diagnosis of F ≥ 3 was 0.911 (0.825-0.997, 9.8), and for diagnosis of F = 4 was 0.917 (0.849-0.985, 15.5). In the validation set, at a cut-off value of 5.9 kPa, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values for F ≥ 2 were 95.7%, 0.0%, 97.8%, and 0.0%, respectively, of 9.8 kPa for F ≥ 3 were 86.2%, 52.6%, 73.5%, and 71.4%, and of 15.5 kPa for F = 4 were 100%, 71.8%, 45.0%, and 100%. Conclusions The stage of stiffness graded by FibroScan has a good correlation with the liver fibrosis of resected liver specimens. It has the ability to diagnose fibrosis stage non-invasively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We previously reported our data on telaprevir or simeprevir used in combination with pegylated interferon (PEG IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) for the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection after liver transplantation (LT). Here, we report three patients who achieved viral responses with no effect on the blood concentrations of immunosuppressive agents following daclatasvir and asunaprevir treatment. The first patient was a 57-year-old man with HCV-related liver cirrhosis who failed to respond to PEG IFN/RBV after living donor LT. He had been treated with 1 mg/day of tacrolimus. The second was a 63-year-old man with HCV-related liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma who failed to respond to PEG IFN/RBV after living donor LT. He had been treated with 1 mg/day of tacrolimus. The third was a 61-year-old man with HCV-related liver cirrhosis. He had been treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Serum HCV RNA became undetectable by TaqMan polymerase chain reaction test after 4 weeks of daclatasvir and asunaprevir treatment in all patients, and no remarkable fluctuations in blood concentration were observed either in tacrolimus or in MMF during 24 weeks of therapy. No adverse events were observed, and all patients received the full dose of daclatasvir and asunaprevir over 24 weeks. Serum HCV RNA remained negative at 12 weeks after the end of treatment in all patients. The daclatasvir and asunaprevir treatment showed a remarkable viral response with little effect on blood levels of immunosuppressive agents for recurrent HCV genotype 1 infection after LT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]