Search

Selection experiments for shortening the four longitudinal veins in a wild population of Drosophila melanogaster have been performed to evaluate how a local change is integrated in the wing development. Our results show that, though many units of selection seem to exist within a given organ, these are strongly constrained within the developmental programme, in such a way that only some predictable forms are expected. The results are discussed in terms of the 'Entelechia' model proposed by Garcia-Bellido in which the intercalarity of positional values promoted by 'martial' genes in a given organ is the driving force for controlled cell proliferation.

The body sizes and shapes of poikilothermic animals generally show clinal variation with latitude. Among the environmental factors responsible for the cline, temperature seems to be the most probable candidate. In the present work we analysed natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster collected at different geographical localities to determine whether the same selective forces acting on wing development in the laboratory are also at work in the wild. We show that the temperature selection acting on wing development in the laboratory is only one of the selective forces operating in the wild. The size differences between natural populations seem to depend exclusively on cell number whereas they depend on cell area in the laboratory. The two wing compartments behave as distinct units of selection subjected to different genetic control, confirming our previous observations on laboratory populations. In addition, subunits of development defined as regions of cell proliferation centres restricted within longitudinal veins can, in turn, be considered as subunits of selection. Their interaction during development and continuous natural selection around an optimum could explain the high wing shape stability generally found in natural populations.

Even though substantial progress has been made to elucidate the physiological and environmental factors underpinning differences in body size, little is known about its genetic architecture. Furthermore, all animal species bear a specific relationship between the size of each organ and overall body size, so different body size traits should be investigated as well as their sexual dimorphism that may have an important impact on the evolution of body size. We have surveyed 191 co-isogenic lines of Drosophila melanogaster, each one of them homozygous for a single P-element insertion, and assessed the effects of mutations on different body size traits compared to the P-element-free co-isogenic control. Nearly 60% of the lines showed significant differences with respect to the control for these traits in one or both sexes and almost 35% showed trait- and sex-specific effects. Candidate gene mutations frequently increased body size in males and decreased it in females. Among the 92 genes identified, most are involved in development and/or metabolic processes and their molecular functions principally include protein-binding and nucleic acid-binding activities. Although several genes showed pleiotropic effects in relation to body size, few of them were involved in the expression of all traits in one or both sexes. These genes seem to be important for different aspects related to the general functioning of the organism. In general, our results indicate that the genetic architecture of body size traits involves a large fraction of the genome and is largely sex and trait specific.Heredity (2009) 102, 246–256; doi:10.1038/hdy.2008.117; published online 19 November 2008 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Drosophila wing has been used as a model to investigate the mechanisms responsible for size and shape changes in nature, since such changes might underlie morphological evolution. To improve the understanding of wing morphological variation and the interpretation of genetic parameters estimates, we have established 59 lines from a Drosophila simulans laboratory population through single pair random matings. The offspring of each line were reared at three different temperatures, and the wing morphology of 12 individuals was analyzed by adjusting an ellipse to the wings' contour. Temperature, sex and line significantly affected wing trait variation, which was mainly characterized by longer wings having the second, fourth and fifth longitudinal veins closer together at the wing tip. As for the genetic parameter estimates, while the cross-environment heritability of some traits, such as wing size (SI), decreased with an increasing difference between the temperatures at which parents and offspring were reared, wing shape (SH) heritability did not seem to change. Since we found indications that neither an increase in the phenotypic variation nor the occurrence of genotype-environment interactions could fully explain the low heritabilities of SI estimated by cross-environment regressions, we discuss the importance of other effects for explaining this discrepancy between the SI and SH heritability estimates. In addition, although the genetic matrix was not entirely represented in the phenotypic matrix, several correspondences were identified, suggesting that the observed patterns of wing morphology variation are genetically controlled. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The fruit-flies Drosophila paranaensis and Drosophila mercatorum pararepleta are sibling species belonging to the repleta group. Females of these two species are normally considered to be morphologically indistinguishable while males only differ consistently in the morphology of their genitalia. These species are sympatric throughout a large area of their geographic distribution. In this study, we investigated the degree of morphological divergence between D. paranaensis and D. mercatorum pararepleta based on morphometric analysis of their wings. The ellipse method was used to describe the placement of the longitudinal and transversal wing veins as well as the size of the wing and the shape of its outline. The heritability under laboratory and field conditions was also estimated from the parameters generated. Multivariate analysis showed that wing morphology possessed sufficient differences to discriminate between the two species with a successful classification rate of 95-98% for females and 82-87% for males. The results of the autoclassification were confirmed by a cross-validation test for females (92-96%). Most measurements possessed significant natural heritability (a mean of 0.48 for D. mercatorum and 0.88 for D. paranaensis), indicating that the variation observed was related to differences in genes acting additively. The principal difference between the two species was in the placement of the posterior transverse wing vein. However, the pattern of morphological variation in the wings of both species was similar, possibly because of shared restrictions in wing development pathways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]