Search

Aim: Preoperative identification of acetabular corrections that optimally improve joint stability and reduce elevated contact stresses could further reduce osteoarthritis progression in patients with hip dysplasia who are treated with periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). The purpose of this study was to investigate how providing patient-specific, mechanically optimal acetabular reorientations to the surgeon during preoperative planning affected the surgically achieved correction. Methods: Preoperative CT scans were used to create patient-specific hip models for 6 patients scheduled for PAO. A simulated acetabular fragment was extracted from the preoperative pelvis model and computationally rotated to simulate candidate acetabular reorientations. For each candidate, discrete element analysis was used to compute contact stresses during walking, which were summed over the gait cycle and scaled by patient age to obtain chronic contact stress-time exposure. The ideal patient-specific reorientation was identified using a cost function that balances minimising chronic stress exposures and achieving surgically acceptable acetabular coverage angles. The optimal reorientation angles and associated contact mechanics were provided to the surgeon preoperatively. After PAO was performed, a model of the surgically achieved correction was created from a postoperative CT scan. Radiographic coverage and contact mechanics were compared between preoperative, optimal, and surgically achieved orientations. Results: While surgically achieved reorientations were not significantly different from optimal reorientations in radiographically measured lateral (p = 0.094) or anterior (p = 0.063) coverage, surgically achieved reorientations had significantly (p = 0.031) reduced total contact area compared to optimal reorientations. The difference in lateral coverage and peak chronic exposure between surgically achieved and optimal reorientations decreased with increasing surgeon experience using the models (R² = 0.758, R2 = 0.630, respectively). Conclusions: Providing hip surgeons with a patient-specific, computationally optimal reorientation during preoperative planning may improve contact mechanics after PAO, which may help reduce osteoarthritis progression in patients with hip dysplasia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The purpose of this study was to use computational modeling to determine if surgical correction of hip dysplasia restores hip contact mechanics to those of asymptomatic, radiographically normal hips. Methods: Discrete element analysis (DEA) was used to compute joint contact stresses during the stance phase of normal walking gait for 10 individuals with radiographically normal, asymptomatic hips and 10 age- and weight-matched patients with acetabular dysplasia who underwent periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Results: Mean and peak contact stresses were higher (p < 0.001 and p = 0.036, respectively) in the dysplastic hips than in the matched normal hips. PAO normalised standard radiographic measurements and medialised the location of computed contact stress within the joint. Mean contact stress computed in dysplastic hips throughout the stance phase of gait (median 5.5 MPa, [IQR 3.9–6.1 MPa]) did not significantly decrease after PAO (3.7 MPa, [IQR 3.2–4.8]; p = 0.109) and remained significantly (p < 0.001) elevated compared to radiographically normal hips (2.4 MPa, [IQR 2.2–2.8 MPa]). Peak contact stress demonstrated a similar trend. Joint contact area during the stance phase of gait in the dysplastic hips increased significantly (p = 0.036) after PAO from 395 mm2 (IQR 378–496 mm2) to 595 mm2 (IQR 474–660 mm2), but remained significantly smaller (p = 0.001) than that for radiographically normal hips (median 1120 mm2, IQR 853–1444 mm2). Conclusions: While contact mechanics in dysplastic hips more closely resembled those of normal hips after PAO, the elevated contact stresses and smaller contact areas remaining after PAO indicate ongoing mechanical abnormalities should be expected even after radiographically successful surgical correction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]