26 results on '"*MODERN logic"'
Search Results
2. Leon Chwistek, The Principles of the Pure Type Theory (1922), translated by Adam Trybus with an Introductory Note by Bernard Linsky.
- Author
-
Trybus, Adam
- Subjects
- *
POLISH philosophy , *TRANSLATIONS of modern literature , *MODERN philosophy , *MATHEMATICAL logic , *MODERN logic , *TWENTIETH century - Abstract
‘The Principles of the Pure Type Theory’ is a translation of Leon Chwistek's 1922 paper ‘Zasady czystej teorii typów’. It summarizes Chwistek's results from a series of studies of the logic of Whitehead and Russell's Principia Mathematica which were published between 1912 and 1924. Chwistek's main argument involves a criticism of the axiom of reducibility. Moreover, ‘The Principles of the Pure Type Theory’ is a source for Chwistek's views on an issue in Whitehead and Russell's ‘no-class theory of classes’ involving the notion of ‘scope’. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Das Problem der apagogischen Beweise in Bolzanos Beyträgen und seiner Wissenschaftslehre.
- Author
-
Centrone, Stefania
- Subjects
- *
MODERN logic , *LOGIC , *HISTORY , *PROOF theory , *EVIDENCE , *CONFIRMATION (Logic) , *PROPOSITION (Logic) , *CONTRADICTION , *NEGATION (Logic) , *NINETEENTH century - Abstract
This paper analyzes and evaluates Bolzano's remarks on the apagogic method of proof with reference to his juvenile booklet ‘Contributions to a better founded presentation of mathematics’ of 1810 and to his ‘Theory of science’ (1837). I shall try to defend the following contentions: (1) Bolzanos’ vain attempt to transform all indirect proofs into direct proofs becomes comprehensible as soon as one recognizes the following facts: (1.1) his attitude towards indirect proofs with an affirmative conclusion differs from his stance to indirect proofs with a negative conclusion; (1.2) by Bolzano's lights arguments via consequentia mirabilis only seem to be indirect. (2) Bolzano does not deny that indirect proofs can be perfect certifications (Gewissmachungen) of their conclusion; what he denies is rather that they can provide grounds for their conclusions. (2.1) They cannot do the latter, since they start from false premises and (2.2) since they make an unnecessary detour. (3) The far-reaching agreement between his early and late assessment of apagogical proofs (in the Beyträge of 1810 and the Wissenschaftslehre of 1837) is partly due to the fact that he develops his own position always against the background of Wolff's and Lambert's views. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. A General Setting for Dedekind's Axiomatization of the Positive Integers.
- Author
-
Weaver, George
- Subjects
- *
METALANGUAGE , *MODERN logic , *CATEGORIES (Mathematics) , *AXIOMS , *ALGEBRA , *PHILOSOPHY of mathematics , *TWENTIETH century - Abstract
A Dedekind algebra is an ordered pair (B, h), where B is a non-empty set and h is a similarity transformation on B. Among the Dedekind algebras is the sequence of the positive integers. From a contemporary perspective, Dedekind established that the second-order theory of the sequence of the positive integers is categorical and finitely axiomatizable. The purpose here is to show that this seemingly isolated result is a consequence of more general results in the model theory of second-order languages. Each Dedekind algebra can be decomposed into a family of disjoint, countable subalgebras called the configurations of the algebra. There are ℵ0 isomorphism types of configurations. Each Dedekind algebra is associated with a cardinal-valued function on ω called its configuration signature. The configuration signature counts the number of configurations in each isomorphism type that occurs in the decomposition of the algebra. Two Dedekind algebras are isomorphic iff their configuration signatures are identical. The second-order theory of any countably infinite Dedekind algebra is categorical, and there are countably infinite Dedekind algebras whose second-order theories are not finitely axiomatizable. It is shown that there is a condition on configuration signatures necessary and sufficient for the second-order theory of a Dedekind algebra to be finitely axiomatizable. It follows that the second-order theory of the sequence of the positive integers is categorical and finitely axiomatizable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. The Absence of Multiple Universes of Discourse in the 1936 Tarski Consequence-Definition Paper.
- Author
-
Corcoran, John and Sagüillo, JoséMiguel
- Subjects
- *
MODERN philosophy , *MODERN logic , *LOGIC , *DEFINITION (Logic) , *TWENTIETH century - Abstract
This paper discusses the history of the confusion and controversies over whether the definition of consequence presented in the 11-page 1936 Tarski consequence-definition paper is based on a monistic fixed-universe framework—like Begriffsschrift and Principia Mathematica. Monistic fixed-universe frameworks, common in pre-WWII logic, keep the range of the individual variables fixed as ‘the class of all individuals’. The contrary alternative is that the definition is predicated on a pluralistic multiple-universe framework—like the 1931 Gödel incompleteness paper. A pluralistic multiple-universe framework recognizes multiple universes of discourse serving as different ranges of the individual variables in different interpretations—as in post-WWII model theory. In the early 1960s, many logicians—mistakenly, as we show—held the ‘contrary alternative’ that Tarski 1936 had already adopted a Gödel-type, pluralistic, multiple-universe framework. We explain that Tarski had not yet shifted out of the monistic, Frege–Russell, fixed-universe paradigm. We further argue that between his Principia-influenced pre-WWII Warsaw period and his model-theoretic post-WWII Berkeley period, Tarski's philosophy underwent many other radical changes. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. The Different Ways in which Logic is (said to be) Formal.
- Author
-
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina
- Subjects
- *
LOGIC , *LANGUAGE & logic , *MODERN logic , *SEMANTICS (Philosophy) , *MATHEMATICAL logic , *THEORY of knowledge , *TWENTIETH century , *MODERN philosophy - Abstract
What does it mean to say that logic is formal? The short answer is: it means (or can mean) several different things. In this paper, I argue that there are (at least) eight main variations of the notion of the formal that are relevant for current discussions in philosophy and logic, and that they are structured in two main clusters, namely the formal as pertaining to forms, and the formal as pertaining to rules. To the first cluster belong the formal as schematic; the formal as indifference to particulars; the formal as topic-neutrality; the formal as abstraction from intentional content; the formal as de-semantification. To the second cluster belong the formal as computable; the formal as pertaining to regulative rules; the formal as pertaining to constitutive rules. I analyze each of these eight variations, providing their historical background and raising related philosophical questions. The significance of this work of ‘conceptual archeology’ is that it may enhance clarity in debates where the notion of the formal plays a prominent role (such as debates where it is expected to play a demarcating role), but where it is oftentimes used equivocally and/or imprecisely. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. McColl and Minimization.
- Author
-
Markham Brown, Frank
- Subjects
- *
LOGIC , *HISTORY , *MATHEMATICAL logic , *INDUCTION (Logic) , *EQUIVALENCE relations (Set theory) , *MODERN logic , *NINETEENTH century , *TWENTIETH century - Abstract
In 1952, Quine showed that the problem of reducing a propositional formula to a simplest normal equivalent can be solved in two steps, viz., (i) express the given formula, Φ, equivalently as the disjunction of all its prime implicants, and (ii) find all non-redundant disjunctions of the latter that are equivalent to Φ (Quine1952). However, it seems not generally known that an ingenious form of the same two-step process was published by Hugh McColl in 1878. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Łukasiewicz and Popper on Induction.
- Author
-
Woleński, Jan and Agassi, Joseph
- Subjects
- *
INDUCTION (Logic) , *MODERN logic , *PROBABILITY theory , *HISTORY of philosophy , *PUBLISHED reprints , *TRANSLATIONS , *TWENTIETH century - Abstract
We compare Jan Łukasiewicz's and Karl Popper's views on induction. The English translation of the two Łukasiewicz's papers is included in the Appendix. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Logic and Mathematics in the Seventeenth Century.
- Author
-
Mugnai, Massimo
- Subjects
- *
MODERN logic , *MATHEMATICS , *HISTORY of philosophy , *INTELLECTUAL history , *INFLUENCE (Literary, artistic, etc.) , *SEVENTEENTH century - Abstract
According to the received view (Bochenski, Kneale), from the end of the fourteenth to the second half of nineteenth century, logic enters a period of decadence. If one looks at this period, the richness of the topics and the complexity of the discussions that characterized medieval logic seem to belong to a completely different world: a simplified theory of the syllogism is the only surviving relic of a glorious past. Even though this negative appraisal is grounded on good reasons, it overlooks, however, a remarkable innovation that imposes itself at the beginning of the sixteenth century: the attempt to connect the two previously separated disciplines of logic and mathematics. This happens along two opposite directions: the one aiming to base mathematical proofs on traditional (Aristotelian) logic; the other attempting to reduce logic to a mathematical (algebraical) calculus. This second trend was reinforced by the claim, mainly propagated by Hobbes, that the activity of thinking was the same as that of performing an arithmetical calculus. Thus, in the period of what Bochenski characterizes as 'classical logic', one may find the seeds of a process which was completed by Boole and Frege and opened the door to the contemporary, mathematical form of logic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Functions in Frege, Bolzano and Husserl.
- Author
-
Centrone, Stefania
- Subjects
- *
LOGIC , *MATHEMATICAL functions , *MODERN logic , *MATHEMATICAL logic , *NINETEENTH century - Abstract
This explorative article is organized around a set of questions concerning the concept of a function. First, a summary of certain general facts about functions that are a common coin in contemporary logic is given. Then Frege's attempt at clarifying the nature of functions in his famous paper Function and Concept and in his Grundgesetze is discussed along with some questions which Freges' approach gave rise to in the literature. Finally, some characteristic uses of functional notions to be found in the work of Bernard Bolzano and in Edmund Husserl's early work are presented and elucidated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. C. I. Lewis on Possible Worlds.
- Author
-
Sedlar, Igor
- Subjects
- *
PLURALITY of worlds , *MATHEMATICAL logic , *MODERN logic , *PRAGMATICS , *LOGIC , *HISTORY , *MANY (Philosophy) , *SEMANTICS (Philosophy) , *HISTORY of philosophy , *TWENTIETH century - Abstract
This article opposes a view widely accepted in studies concerning the history of modal logic, according to which (i) the approach of C. I. Lewis towards constructing modern modal logic was purely syntactical (i.e. limited to the construction of axiomatic systems S1-S5 of propositional modal logic), and (ii) the notion of a possible world was incorporated into modern logic and philosophy mainly by authors such as Rudolf Carnap and Saul Kripke. The article presents Lewis' definition of a possible world, and his formulation of the truth-conditions of statements containing strict implication as their main connective in terms of possible worlds. The main question of the article is whether it is possible to consider Lewis' work in this area as an early stage of the development of possible world semantics, and if so, in what sense? The article concludes by answering affirmatively, due to soundness and completeness proofs with respect to S5 using Lewis' semantics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Russell's Early Theory of Denoting.
- Author
-
Bostock, David
- Subjects
- *
PREDICATE (Logic) , *INTERPRETATION (Philosophy) , *MATHEMATICAL linguistics , *PROPOSITION (Logic) , *MODERN logic , *TWENTIETH century - Abstract
The article concerns the treatment of the so-called denoting phrases, of the forms 'every A', 'any A', 'an A' and 'some A', in Russell's Principles of Mathematics. An initially attractive interpretation of what Russell's theory was has been proposed by P.T. Geach, in his Reference and Generality (1962). A different interpretation has been proposed by P. Dau (Notre Dame Journal, 1986). The article argues that neither of these is correct, because both credit Russell with a more thought-out theory than he actually had. The conclusion is mainly negative: at this date Russell has no coherent theory of these phrases. An appendix notes that his understanding of the quantifiers in predicate logic is also, at this date, not entirely secure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Methodological Practice and Complementary Concepts of Logical Consequence: Tarski's Model-Theoretic Consequence and Corcoran's Information-Theoretic Consequence.
- Author
-
Sagüillo, JoséM.
- Subjects
- *
LOGIC , *LOGICIANS , *THEORY of knowledge , *MODERN logic , *CONSEQUENTIA (Logic) , *AUTOMATIC theorem proving , *MODERN philosophy , *TWENTIETH century - Abstract
This article discusses two coextensive concepts of logical consequence that are implicit in the two fundamental logical practices of establishing validity and invalidity for premise-conclusion arguments. The premises and conclusion of an argument have information content (they 'say' something), and they have subject matter (they are 'about' something). The asymmetry between establishing validity and establishing invalidity has long been noted: validity is established through an information-processing procedure exhibiting a step-by-step deduction of the conclusion from the premise-set. Invalidity is established by exhibiting a countermodel satisfying the premises but not the conclusion. The process of establishing validity focuses on information content; the process of establishing invalidity focuses on subject matter. Corcoran's information-theoretic concept of logical consequence corresponds to the former. Tarski's model-theoretic concept of logical consequence formulated in his famous 1936 no-countermodels definition corresponds to the latter. Both are found to be indispensable for understanding the rationale of the deductive method and each complements the other. This study discusses the ontic question of the nature of logical consequence and the epistemic question of the human capabilities presupposed by practical applications of these two concepts as they make validity and invalidity accessible to human knowledge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Locke and Arnauld on Judgment and Proposition.
- Author
-
van der Schaar, Maria
- Subjects
- *
PROPOSITION (Logic) , *LANGUAGE & logic , *JUDGMENT (Logic) , *INTELLECT , *MODERN philosophy -- 17th century , *MODERN logic , *SEVENTEENTH century - Abstract
To understand pre-Fregean theories of judgment and proposition, such as those found in Locke and the Port-Royal logic, it is important to distinguish between propositions in the modern sense and propositions in the pre-Fregean sense. By making this distinction it becomes clear that these pre-Fregean theories cannot be meant to solve the propositional attitude problem. Notwithstanding this fact, Locke and Arnauld are able to make a distinction between asserted and unasserted propositions (in their sense). The way Locke makes this distinction turns out to be very different from the way it is made by Arnauld. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. J.S. Mill's Canons of Induction: From True Causes to Provisional Ones.
- Author
-
Ducheyne, Steffen
- Subjects
- *
INDUCTION (Logic) , *MODERN logic , *19TH century English philosophy , *CAUSATION (Philosophy) , *NINETEENTH century ,HISTORY of the theory of knowledge - Abstract
In this essay, my aim is twofold: to clarify how the late Mill conceived of the certainty of inductive generalisations and to offer a systematic clarification of the limited domain of application of Mill's Canons of Induction. I shall argue that Mill's views on the certainty of knowledge changed over time and that this change was accompanied by a new view on the certainty of the inductive results yielded by the Canons of Induction. The key message of the later editions of The System of Logic as conceived by the late Mill was no longer that by the Canons of Induction we can establish scientific certainty and true causes, but rather that the Canons are useful in establishing causal laws in a provisional way. Deduction is a game and induction a grievance. (Bagehot 1913, vol. 3, p. 37) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Jaina Logic: A Contemporary Perspective.
- Author
-
Priest, Graham
- Subjects
- *
JAINA philosophy , *MODERN logic , *FORMAL language semantics , *COMPREHENSION (Theory of knowledge) , *LOGIC , *FORM (Logic) , *THEORY (Philosophy) , *HISTORY , *RELATIVITY - Abstract
Jaina philosophy provides a very distinctive account of logic, based on the theory of 'sevenfold predication'. This paper provides a modern formalisation of the logic, using the techniques of many-valued and modal logic. The formalisation is applied, in turn, to some of the more problematic aspects of Jaina philosophy, especially its relativism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. A Comparative Taxonomy of Medieval and Modern Approaches to Liar Sentences.
- Author
-
Novaes, C.Dutilh
- Subjects
- *
SEMANTICS (Philosophy) , *TAXONOMY , *LIAR paradox , *LOGIC , *MEDIEVAL logic , *MODERN logic , *HISTORY , *HISTORY of philosophy , *SENTENCES (Grammar) - Abstract
Two periods in the history of logic and philosophy are characterized notably by vivid interest in self-referential paradoxical sentences in general, and Liar sentences in particular: the later medieval period (roughly from the 12th to the 15th century) and the last 100 years. In this paper, I undertake a comparative taxonomy of these two traditions. I outline and discuss eight main approaches to Liar sentences in the medieval tradition, and compare them to the most influential modern approaches to such sentences. I also emphasize the aspects of each tradition that find no counterpart in the other one. It is expected that such a comparison may point in new directions for future research on the paradoxes; indeed, the present analysis allows me to draw a few conclusions about the general nature of Liar sentences, and to identify aspects that would require further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Katibī on the Relation of Opposition of Concepts.
- Author
-
Hodjati, SeyyedMohammad Ali
- Subjects
- *
CONTRADICTION , *CONCEPTUAL structures , *CONCEPTS , *MODERN logic , *PROPOSITION (Logic) , *ANCIENT philosophy , *MUSLIM logicians , *DEBATE , *LOGICIANS - Abstract
According to a rule of traditional logic concerning the relation between general (or universal) concepts, if a given concept is more general than a second one, then the opposition (or contradictory) of the first concept is more specific than the opposition (or contradictory) of the second one. Katibī, one of the Muslim logicians in the 13th century, has raised a question against this rule and, by giving some counterexamples, claims that it results in contradiction. Some Muslim logicians have replied to Katibī, and in this paper I have examined their replies. Also, by using rules of modern logic, we may easily show that either Katibī's argumentation is fallacious or it does not result in contradiction; however, it seems that if modern logic rules had been represented to Muslim logicians, some of those rules would have been rejected by them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. On the Substitutional Characterization of First-Order Logical Truth.
- Author
-
McKeon, Matthew
- Subjects
- *
FIRST-order logic , *MODERN logic , *MATHEMATICAL logic , *LOGIC , *PHILOSOPHY , *TRUTH - Abstract
I consider the well-known criticism of Quine's characterization of first-order logical truth that it expands the class of logical truths beyond what is sanctioned by the model-theoretic account. Briefly, I argue that at best the criticism is shallow and can be answered with slight alterations in Quine's account. At worse the criticism is defective because, in part, it is based on a misrepresentation of Quine. This serves not only to clarify Quine's position, but also to crystallize what is and what is not at issue in choosing the model-theoretic account of first-order logical truth over one in terms of substitutions. I conclude by highlighting the need for justifying the belief that the definition of first-order logical truth in terms of models is superior to its definition in terms of substitutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2004
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Undefinability of Truth. The Problem of Priority: Tarski vs Gödel.
- Author
-
Murawski, Roman
- Subjects
- *
PHILOSOPHY , *MATHEMATICIANS , *MODERN logic , *TRUTH - Abstract
The article discusses the philosophical and historical problems on the theorem of undefinability of the notion of truth in the U.S. The author notes that the mathematician Alfred Tarski published the theorem independently depicting the problem of priority on proving the theory. He mentions the Godel methods in proving the theorem of undefinability of truth and the recognition of the contrast in definability of probability and formal definability of truth.
- Published
- 1998
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Frege and his Groups.
- Author
-
Aho, Tuomo
- Subjects
- *
MATHEMATICIANS , *PHILOSOPHY of mind , *LANGUAGE & logic , *MODERN logic - Abstract
The article offers information on the life and works of Friedrich Ludwig Gottlob Frege in the U.S. The author reflects the works of Frege as a founder of modern logic and his philosophical views in significance to the Philosophy of language and metaphysics though professionally he is a mathematician. In this regard, he discusses several dissertation including Rechnungsmethoden and Begriffsschrift that correspond the contemporaneous mathematical development.
- Published
- 1998
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Frege's Logic.
- Author
-
Sullivan, Peter
- Subjects
- *
MODERN logic , *NONFICTION , *NINETEENTH century - Abstract
The article reviews the book "Frege's Logic," by Danielle Macbeth.
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Contemporary Perspectives on Logicism and the Foundation of Mathematics.
- Author
-
Landini, Gregory
- Subjects
- *
PHILOSOPHY of mathematics , *MODERN logic , *NONFICTION - Abstract
The article reviews the book "Contemporary Perspectives on Logicism and the Foundation of Mathematics," edited by Pierre Joray.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce.
- Author
-
Walsh, Alison
- Subjects
- *
MODERN logic , *NONFICTION - Abstract
The article reviews the book "Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce," edited by Nathan Houser and Don D. Robert.
- Published
- 1998
25. Arguments about Arguments. Systematic, Critical, and Historical Essays in Logical Theory.
- Author
-
Maat, Jaap
- Subjects
- *
MODERN logic , *NONFICTION - Abstract
The article reviews the book "Arguments About Arguments: Systematic, Critical, and Historical Essays in Logical Theory," by Maurice A. Finocchiaro.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. The Evolution of Logic.
- Author
-
Scanlan, Michael
- Subjects
- *
MODERN logic , *NONFICTION , *TWENTIETH century - Abstract
A review of the book "The Evolution of Logic," by W. D. Hart is presented.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.