Search

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) impacts patients in their 60s, but its incidence in younger patients is increasing. We hypothesize that younger patients may have worse oncologic outcomes., Methods: Patients who underwent curative pancreatic resection for PDAC between January 2011 and December 2021 at a single institution were analyzed. Early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC) was defined as pancreatic cancer diagnosed in patients ≤50 years. Clinical and survival outcomes were compared between EOPC and Conventional Onset Pancreas Cancer (COPC)., Results: A total of 1133 patients were identified, 65 (5.7%) were EOPC. Preoperative patient characteristics including sex, smoking status, alcohol habitus, diabetes mellitus, CA 19-9, and neoadjuvant therapy were similar between EOPC and COPC (p > 0.05). EOPC patients were more likely non-white (p = 0.03), had lower ASA scores (p = 0.02) and larger median tumor size (33 vs 28 mm, p = 0.04), but had similar pathological stages and rate of R0 resections (p > 0.05). Postoperative outcomes were similar (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in overall (HR 0.93, CI 0.64, 1.33; p = 0.68) or recurrence free (HR 1.05, CI 0.75, 1.48; p = 0.77) survival between the EOPC and COPC after adjusting for significant factors., Conclusion: Patients with EOPC who underwent surgical resection had similar oncological outcomes compared to patients with COPC., (Copyright © 2023 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Open combined resections of colorectal primary tumors and synchronous liver metastases have become common in selected cases. However, evidences favoring a minimally invasive (MIS) approach are still limited. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of MIS vs. open synchronous liver and colorectal resections., Methods: 384 cases of synchronous colorectal and liver resections performed at one institution were identified during the study period. MIS vs open approach were compared after a propensity score matching; surgical outcomes were analyzed., Results: MIS cases featured longer operative time (399 vs 300 min, p < 0.001), fewer blood loss (200 vs 500 ml, p = 0.003), and shorter hospitalization (median LOS 4 vs 6 days, p = 0.001). No difference was observed between the two groups for use of Pringle maneuver (p = 0.083), intraoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.061), achievement of negative colorectal (p = 0.176) and liver margins (p = 1.000), postoperative complications (p = 1.000) and significant (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3a) complications (p = 0.817), delay of adjuvant therapy due to complications (p = 0.555), 30- and 90-day mortality., Conclusion: Synchronous colorectal and liver metastases resections via a minimally-invasive approach in high-volume centers with appropriate expertise result in significantly lower blood loss and length of stay despite longer operative time in comparison to open, with no oncological inferiority., (Copyright © 2023 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Data regarding laparoscopic liver resections(LLRs) for Gallbladder cancer(GBC) and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma(iCCA) are sparse. This study compared LLRs with open liver resections(OLRs) in a high-volume center., Methods: Data of patients who underwent LLR or OLR for GBC or iCCA at Mayo-Clinic between 01/2016 and 04/2021 were retrospectively compared. Proportional hazards models were used to compare the approach on survival., Results: 32 and 52 patients underwent LLR and OLR during the study period, respectively. 64 and 20 patients had iCCA and GBC, respectively. LLR had lower median blood loss (250 mL vs. 475 mL, p = 0.001) and shorter median length of stay compared to OLR (3.0 days vs. 6.0 days, p = 0.001). LLR and OLR did not differ in post-operative major complication (25% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.62), negative margin (100% vs. 90.4%, p = 0.15) and completeness of lymphadenectomy rates (36.8% vs. 45.5%, p = 0.59). The median number of harvested lymph node was 4.0 and 5.0 for LLR and OLR, respectively (p = 0.347). There were no associations between approach and 3-year overall and disease-free survival between LLR and OLR (49.8% vs. 63.2% and 39.6% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.66 and p = 0.69)., Discussion: With appropriate patient selection and when compared to OLRs, LLRs for GBC and iCCA are feasible, safe and offer potential short-term benefits without compromising on oncological resection principals and long-term outcomes., (Copyright © 2023 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Arterial resection (AR) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is increasingly considered at specialized centers. We aimed to examine the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of hepatic artery (HA) occlusion after revascularization., Methods: We included patients undergoing HA resection with interposition graft (IG) or primary end-to-end anastomoses (EE). Complete arterial occlusion (CAO) was defined as "early" (EO) or "late" (LO) before/after 90 days respectively. Kaplan-Meier and change-point analysis for CAO was performed., Results: HA resection was performed in 108 patients, IG in 61% (66/108) and EE in 39% (42/108). An equal proportion (50%) underwent HA resection alone or in combination with celiac and/or superior mesenteric artery. CAO was identified in 18% of patients (19/108) with arterial IG least likely to occlude (p=0.019). Hepatic complications occurred in 42% (45/108) and correlated with CAO, symptomatic patients, venous resection, and postoperative portal venous patency. CAO-related operative mortality was 4.6% and significantly higher in EO vs LO (p = 0.046). Median CAO occlusion was 126 days. With change-point analysis, CAO was minimal beyond postoperative day 158., Conclusion: CAO can occur in up to 18% of patients and the first 5-month post-operative period is critical for surveillance. LO is associated with better outcomes compared to EO unless there is inadequate portal venous inflow., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The decision to undertake pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and precancerous lesions has historically relied on outcomes data from operations for cancer. We aimed to describe risks for these specific patients and identify the highest risk groups., Methods: The ACS-NSQIP pancreatic targeted data was queried for pancreaticoduodenectomies for benign and pre-cancerous neoplasms from 2014 to 2018. Baseline characteristics, operative techniques and outcomes were examined. Multivariate regression was performed to identify predictors of major complications., Results: 748 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for (n = 541,72.3%) IPMN, (n = 87,11.6%) MCN, (n = 78,10.4%) serous cystadenoma, and (n = 42,5.6%) solid pseudopapillary neoplasm. Median LOS was 8 days. Major complications (n = 135,18.0%), non-home discharges (n = 83,11.1%) and readmissions (n = 153,20.5%) occurred frequently. In patients ≥ 80 years of age (n = 37), major complications (n = 11,29.7%) and non-home discharge (n = 9,24.3%) were quite common. 5-item modified frailty index ≥ 0.4 (OR 1.84,95%CI 1.06-3.19,p = 0.030), Male sex (OR 1.729,95%CI 1.152-2.595,p = 0.008), Age ≥ 65 (OR 1.63,95%CI 1.05-2.54,p = 0.29) and African-American race (OR 2.50,95%CI 1.22-5.16,p = 0.013) were independent predictors of major morbidity., Conclusions: Pancreaticoduodenectomies in this setting have high rates of major complications. Morbidity extends beyond the index hospitalization, with frequent readmission and non-home discharge. Patient specific factors, rather than technical or disease factors predicted outcomes. In certain patients, particularly those older than 80, the morbidity of this operation may exceed the cancer prevention benefits., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Experimental evidence suggests sex dependent differences in liver regeneration. Limited evidence is available examining sex differences in post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and postoperative outcomes. Our aim was to assess the influence of sex on the outcomes after liver resection., Methods: The hepatectomy targeted National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was assessed for associations between sex and outcomes., Results: A total of 13,401 patients underwent elective hepatic resection between 2014-2017. PHLF was highest among male patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (OR = 2.81,95%CI:1.40-5.62). Male sex was independently associated with increased PHLF (OR = 1.47,95%CI:1.15-1.88), major complications (OR = 1.25,95%CI:1.08-1.45), mortality (OR = 1.61,95%CI:1.03-2.50), and if only major resections were assessed (OR = 1.38,95%CI:1.03-1.84). Diagnosis specific subgroup analyses revealed that effects of sex were predominantly HCC associated., Conclusions: This is the largest series investigating the effects of gender on outcomes after hepatic resection. We documented that women undergoing liver resection have significantly lower risk of PHLF. This difference seemed influenced by the striking increase of PHLF in male HCC patients. These hypothesis suggest that sex might play a role in preoperative risk stratification., (Copyright © 2022 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: While pancreatectomy with portomesenteric venous resection and reconstruction is commonly performed for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, little is known regarding outcomes for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs)., Methods: Patients who underwent non-parenchyma-sparing pancreatectomy for panNENs at Mayo Clinic from 2000 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching was performed and patient characteristics and outcomes compared., Results: Of 867 eligible patients, 41 (4.7%) required vascular resection, including 38 patients who underwent portomesenteric venous resection only. Of these, 23 underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy and 15 distal pancreatectomy. Patients who required portomesenteric venous resection had larger tumors, higher tumor grade, and higher disease stage. After propensity score matching to patients undergoing standard resection, the portomesenteric venous resection group had longer operative times, greater blood loss, and higher transfusion rates. While portomesenteric venous thrombosis was more common after venous resection, major complication rates and perioperative mortality were similar between the two groups, as were 5-year overall and progression-free survival., Conclusion: For patients with locally advanced panNENs, pancreatectomy with portomesenteric venous resection and reconstruction can be performed in selected patients at high-volume centers with acceptable perioperative morbidity and short- and long-term survival., (Copyright © 2021 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Concurrent resection of the primary cancer and synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) was evaluated for differences in outcomes following stratification of both the liver and colorectal resection., Methods: Consecutive cases of synchronous resection of both the CRC primary and CRCLM were reviewed retrospectively at a single, high-volume institution over a 17-year period (2000-2017)., Results: 273 patients underwent simultaneous resection of CRCLM. The distribution of the primary lesion was similar between the colon (52.4%) and rectum (47.6%), while 46.9% of patients had bilobar liver disease. Major liver/major colorectal resection (n = 24) were significantly more likely to experience colorectal specific morbidity (OR 3.98, 95% CI 1.56-10.15, p = 0.004), liver specific morbidity (OR 7.4, 95% CI 2.22-24.71, p = 0.001), total morbidity (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.18-7.18, p = 0.020) and 90-day mortality (OR 5.50, 95% CI 1.27-23.81, p = 0.023). Failure to receive adjuvant chemotherapy secondary to postoperative morbidity was associated with significantly worsened survival (HR for death 5.91, 95% CI 1.59-22.01, p = 0.008)., Conclusions: Postoperative morbidity precluding the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with an increase in mortality. Combining a major liver with major colorectal resection is associated with a significant increase in major morbidity and 90-day mortality, and should be avoided., (Copyright © 2021 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Preoperative opioid use in patients undergoing low complexity operations has been associated with increased complications, but its relationship to procedures of greater complexity is unclear. We aimed to assess this impact on outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD)., Methods: A single institution, retrospective cohort of adults undergoing elective PD for cancer (1/2009-9/2015). Preoperative opioid users were defined as patients documented as taking opioids up to 90 days preoperatively. Discharge prescriptions were converted into Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME) and ten-point pain scores were abstracted. Univariate and multivariable analyses compared outcomes of naïve and preoperative opioid users overall and for laparoscopic vs open surgery., Results: Of 661 PD patients, 131 (19.8%) were preoperative opioid users. These patients had greater mean pain scores over the first three days after surgery (3.4 ± 1.6, vs 2.8 ± 1.4, p < 0.001), max pain (7.9 ± 1.9 vs 7.2 ± 2.0, p < 0.001), and discharge pain (2.3 ± 1.9 vs 1.8 ± 1.6, p = 0.01) than naïve patients. Preoperative opioid users received more opioids at discharge (mean 496 ± 764 OME) than naïve (320 ± 489 OME, p = 0.03). Thirty-day refill rates were 12.6% (19.1% preoperative vs 10.9% naïve, p = 0.02). After controlling for tumor type, pancreas texture, and duct size, naïve patients had similar odds of clinically significant post-operative pancreatic fistulas (grade B or C) (OR 1.13, p = 0.68) and delayed gastric emptying (OR 1.05, p = 0.87). After controlling for age and complications, preoperative opioid use was associated with increased odds of LOS ≥9 days (OR 1.59, p = 0.04)., Conclusion: Following PD, preoperative opioid users had worse pain scores, received more opioids at discharge, refilled prescriptions more frequently, and were more likely to have prolonged LOS. As most opioid utilization research has been focused on low complexity surgery, additional work aimed at optimizing opioid use in complex oncologic operations is warranted., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Intrahepatic lesions of mixed hepatocellular (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC) histology are rare. The aim was to describe the natural history of these tumors relative to monomorphic ICC or HCC utilizing the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB)., Methods: Patients with ICC, HCC, and mixed histology (cHCC-CCA) were identified in the NCDB (2004-2012). Inter-group comparisons were made. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards analyzed overall survival., Results: The query identified 90,499 patients with HCC; 14,463 with ICC; and 1141 with cHCC-CCA histology. Patients with cHCC-CCA histology were relatively young (61 vs. 62 (HCC, p = 0.877) and 67 (ICC, p < 0.001) years) and more likely to have poorly differentiated tumor (29.2% vs. 10.3% (HCC) and 17.2% (ICC) p < 0.001). Median overall survival for cHCC-CCA was 7.9 months vs. 10.8 (HCC) and 8.2 (ICC, all p < 0.001). Stage-specific survival for mixed histology tumors was most similar to that of HCC for all stages. cHCC-CCA were transplanted at a relatively high rate, and transplant outcomes for mixed tumors were substantially worse than for HCC lesions., Discussion: cHCC-CCA demonstrate stage-specific survival similar to HCC, but post-surgical survival more consistent with ICC. Patients with a pre-operative diagnosis of cHCC-CCA should undergo resection when appropriate., (Copyright © 2016 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Elderly patients undergoing open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) are at increased risk for surgical morbidity and mortality. Whether totally laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (TLPD) mitigates these risks has not been evaluated., Methods: A retrospective review of outcomes in patients submitted to pancreatoduodenectomy during 2007-2014 was conducted (n = 860). Outcomes in elderly patients (aged ≥70 years) were compared with those in non-elderly patients with respect to risk-adjusted postoperative morbidity and mortality. Differences in outcomes between patients submitted to OPD and TLPD, respectively, were evaluated in the elderly subgroup., Results: In elderly patients, the incidences of cardiac events (odds ratio [OR] 3.21, P < 0.001), respiratory events (OR 1.68, P = 0.04), delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (OR 1.73, P = 0.003), increased length of stay (LoS, 1 additional day) (P < 0.001), discharge disposition other than home (OR 8.14, P < 0.001) and blood transfusion (OR 1.48, P = 0.05) were greater than in non-elderly patients. Morbidity and mortality did not differ between the OPD and TLPD subgroups of elderly patients. In elderly patients, OPD was associated with increased DGE (OR 1.80, P = 0.03), LoS (1 additional day; P < 0.001) and blood transfusion (OR 2.89, P < 0.001) compared with TLPD., Conclusions: Elderly patients undergoing TLPD experience rates of mortality, morbidity and cardiorespiratory events similar to those in patients submitted to OPD. In elderly patients, TLPD offers benefits by decreasing DGE, LoS and blood transfusion requirements., (© 2015 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.)

Introduction: Oncological implications of laparoscopic resection in primary hepatic malignancy are not well defined. Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in comparison to an open liver resection (OLR) in peri-operative and long-term oncological outcomes are described from a single North American institution., Methods: From 2006 to 2013, all forty-three LLR patients for HCC were evaluated. Each patient was matched to two OLR patients for age at operation, maximal tumour size and tumour number., Results: When compared with OLR, LLR had a lower severity of complication (0% versus 27%, P = 0.050) and lower 30-day readmission rate (2.3% versus 18.6%, P = 0.010). The length of stay (LOS) was shorter in LLR patients (5 versus 7 days, P < 0.001) and the estimated blood loss was also lower in LLR (300 versus 700 ml, P = 0.004). Admission to intensive care unit (ICU), emergency room (ER) visits and complication rates were similar. Overall, recurrence-free and intra-hepatic recurrence-free survival were comparable between LLR and OLR., Discussion: LLR confers the widely-accepted benefits of laparoscopic surgery, namely severity of complication, 30-day readmission rate, LOS and blood loss. Further studies are required to examine intra- and extra-hepatic recurrence after LLR. LLR for HCC should be considered for appropriately selected patients in centres with requisite volume and expertise., (© 2014 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.)