Search

The skin is an attractive tissue for gene therapy applications to treat genetic disorders and to express systemically delivered transgenes encoding therapeutic proteins. Understanding the tissue tropism of vectors is a prerequisite for the design of gene therapy trials. Using an ex vivo system of organ culture, we studied factors that determined viral tropism to the epidermal and dermal cells in human and mouse skin. We applied in these studies a lentiviral vector pseudotyped with two glycoproteins that use different cell receptors (vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein [VSV-G] and amphotropic murine leukemia virus envelope). The extent of infection with the amphotropic pseudotype was much higher than that of VSV-G, especially at low multiplicities of infection. In contrast, the tropism of these two pseudotypes in skin tissues was similar; at low multiplicities the infection was limited to areas near the basal layer of the epidermis, whereas at high multiplicities the infection extended to the dermal layer. To overcome physical barriers in the skin, the epidermal and dermal layers were separated and infected. Whereas the human epidermis was readily infected, we could not detect infection of stem and early progenitor cells in their niche. In contrast, mouse epidermis was completely resistant to infection. Dermal cells of both species were readily infected with the two pseudotypes. Molecular analysis indicated that infection of mouse epidermal cells was restricted after proviral DNA synthesis and before integration. In conclusion, we show that lentiviral tropism in a solid tissue is dependent on several factors, extra- and intracellular, distinct of the cellular receptors.

Lentiviral vectors are an important tool for gene transfer research and gene therapy purposes. However, the low stability of these vectors affects their production, storage, and efficacy in preclinical and clinical settings. In the present work the mechanism underlying the thermosensitivity of lentiviral vectors was evaluated. For lentiviral vectors pseudotyped with amphotropic and RDpro envelopes, the capacity to perform reverse transcription was lost rapidly at 37 degrees C, in high correlation with the loss of infectivity. The vector with RDpro envelope presented a higher level of stability than that with amphotropic envelope for both the reverse transcription process and viral infectivity. Reverse transcriptase enzyme inactivation and viral template RNA degradation were not implicated in the loss of the viral capacity to perform reverse transcription. Furthermore, early entry steps in the infection process do not determine the rate of viral inactivation, as the amount of viral RNA and p24 protein entering the cells decreased slowly for both vectors. Taken together, it can be concluded that the reverse transcription process is thermolabile and thus determines the rate of lentiviral inactivation. Strategies to stabilize the reverse transcription process should be pursued to improve the applicability of lentiviral vectors in gene therapy.