Search

Donor exchange programs were designed to allocate organs for highly sensitized (HS) patients. The allocation algorithm differs slightly among countries and includes different strategies to improve access to transplants in HS patients. However, many HS patients with a calculated panel reactive of antibodies (cPRA) of 100 % remain on the waiting list for a long time. Some allocation algorithms assume immunological risk, including Imlifidase treatment, to increase the chance of transplantation in very HS patients. Here, we describe our unicenter experience of low-risk delisting strategy in 15 HS patients included in the Spanish donor exchange program without donor offers. After delisting, 7 out of 15 HS patients reduced the cPRA below 99.95 % and impacted the reduction of time on the waiting list (p = 0.01), where 5 out of 7 achieved transplantation. Within those HS that remained above 99.95 %, 1 out of 8 was transplanted. All the HS were transplanted with delisted DSA, and only one with DSA level rebounded early after transplantation. All HS transplanted after delisting maintain graft function. The transplant immunology laboratories are challenged to search intermediate risk assessment methods for delisting high HS patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Humoral immunity emerges as a risk factor for graft failure after visceral transplantation (VTx) and development of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) has been linked with poor outcomes. In most cases, a simultaneous liver transplant can be safely performed in sensitized patients with DSA and appears protective against lymphocytotoxic antibodies. We investigated the incidence of acute (AR) and chronic rejection (CR) in 32 VTx without any B cell-depleting pre-treatment (6 isolated intestinal transplants (IT) and 26 liver-containing, multivisceral transplants (MVT) and assessed the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) pre- and post-transplantation. Twenty-one patients (65 %) developed AR, 15 (57 %) of the MVT and 6 (100 %) of the IT (p = 0.05). CR occurred in 4 IT (60 %, p < 0.001). At one month, de novo DSA were present in 71 % of VTx (66 % MVT vs 100 % IT, p = 0.09). At the last available follow-up, 69 % of the MVT and 50 % of the IT patients were DSA-free. D e novo DSA seemed more persistent (7/19, 37 %) than pre-Tx DSA (1/6, 17 %; p = n.s.), de novo DSA were more frequently specific for HLA class II than class I, 16/19 (84 %) vs. 7/19 (37 %; p = 0.003), and HLA-DQ was their most frequent target HLA. DQ mismatches appeared to be a risk factor for developing de novo DSA. In conclusion, liver-containing visceral allografts have superior short- and long-term outcomes compared with liver-free allografts. De novo DSA develop early and frequently after VTx performed without B cell-depleting induction therapy, but the exact role of DSA in the pathogenesis of rejection remains unclear. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic-active antibody-mediated rejection (CAABMR) is associated with poor kidney graft survival and has no clear effective treatment. Forty-one cases of CAABMR were detected in indication graft biopsies and evaluated according to current Banff classification. We investigated the impact of concurrent donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and their characteristics, together with non-adherence regarding immunosuppression on CAABMR histopathological phenotypes and prognosis. Twenty-four (59%) patients had detectable DSA at biopsy, with 15 of them being considered non-adherent. Graft function at biopsy was similar in DSA (+) and (−) patients. DSA (+) patients had significantly higher tubulointerstitial inflammation (i and ti) and acute humoral (g+ptc+v+C4d) composite score than DSA (−). DSA (+)/non-adherent cases presented additionally with increased microvascular inflammation (ptc and v), besides having a distinctively lower ah score. C1q DSA strength was higher ( P  = .046) in non-adherent patients and correlated closely with C4d score ( P  = .002). Lower graft function and ah score, higher proteinuria and ci + ct score, and, separately per each model, DSA (+) (HR = 2.446, P  = .034), DSA (+)/non-adherent (HR = 3.657, P  = .005) and DSA (+)/C1q (+) (HR = 4.831, P  = .003) status were independent predictors of graft failure. CAABMR with concomitant DSA pose a higher risk of graft failure. Adherence should be evaluated, and histopathological phenotyping and DSA characterization may add critical information. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Preformed HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) only detected with Luminex have been associated with increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and graft failure after kidney transplantation (KT). Their evolution after KT may modify this risk. We analyzed postransplant evolution of preformed DSA identified retrospectively and their impact on outcomes of 370 KT performed 2006–2014. Antibodies were monitored prospectively at 1-3-5 years after KT and if any dysfunction. Early acute ABMR was more frequent among patients with preformed DSA class-I or I + II than isolated class-II (29.4% vs 4.5%, p = 0.02). One year post-KT, 20 of 34 patients with functioning KT had persistent DSA. Preformed DSA class-II persisted more frequently than class-I/I + II (66.7% vs 33.3%; p = 0.031). The only risk factor independently associated with persistence was pretransplant MFI. Patients with de novo DSA had the highest risk of ABMR (HR 22.2 [CI 6.1–81.2]). Although recipients with persisting preformed DSA had significantly increased ABMR risk (HR 14.7 [CI 6.5–33.0]), those with cleared preformed DSA also had a higher risk than those without DSA (HR 7.01 [CI 2.2–21.8]). Preformed DSA are a very important risk factor for ABMR and graft loss. Patients who clear preformed DSA still show an increased risk of ABMR and graft loss after KT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The detrimental impact of preformed anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is well defined, contrarily to non-donor-specific antibodies (NDSA). We sought to evaluate their clinical impact in a cohort of 724 kidney graft recipients in whom anti-HLA antibodies were thoroughly screened and identified in pre-transplant sera by solid-phase assays. NDSA or DSA were detected in 100 (13.8%) and 47 (6.5%) recipients respectively, while 577 (79.7%) were non-allosensitized (NaS). Incidence of antibody-mediated rejection at 1-year was 0.7%, 4.0% and 25.5% in NaS, NDSA and DSA patients, respectively (NaS vs. NDSA P = 0.004; NaS vs. DSA P < 0.001; NDSA vs. DSA P < 0.001). Graft survival was lowest in DSA (78.7%), followed by NDSA (88.0%) and NaS (93.8%) recipients (NaS vs. NDSA P = 0.015; NaS vs. DSA P < 0.001; NDSA vs. DSA P = 0.378). Multivariable competing risk analysis confirmed both NDSA (sHR = 2.19; P = 0.025) and DSA (sHR = 2.87; P = 0.012) as significant predictors of graft failure. The negative effect of NDSA and DSA on graft survival was significant in patients receiving no induction ( P = 0.019) or an anti-IL-2 receptor antibody ( P < 0.001), but not in those receiving anti-thymocyte globulin ( P = 0.852). The recognition of the immunological risk associated with preformed DSA but also NDSA have important implications in patients’ risk stratification, and may impact clinical decisions at transplant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In contrast to other types of organ transplantation, liver-transplant recipients used to be considered highly resistant to donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). Consequently, most transplant programs did not consider the presence of DSAs at transplantation or during the follow-up. However, since the early 1990s, antibody-mediated pathological lesions have been recognized in ABO-incompatible liver-transplant recipients. Recent data confirm the detrimental effect of preformed and de novo DSAs in ABO-compatible liver transplantation, with inferior clinical outcomes in patients presenting with circulating antibodies. Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), plasma-cell hepatitis, biliary stricture, but also long-term complications, such as chronic rejection, liver ductopenia, and graft fibrosis, are now recognized to be associated with DSAs. Moreover, some non-HLA DSAs are suspected to induce graft dysfunction. Clinical, biological, and histological patterns within AMR need to be clarified. Treatment of these complications has yet to be defined. This article summarizes recent advances concerning the impact of preformed and de novo DSAs in liver transplantation, it defines the complications associated with DSAs, and discusses the potential strategies to manage patients with such complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) to HLA-DP may cause antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), especially in re-transplants. We describe the immunization history of a patient who received 3 kidney transplants; the 3rd kidney was completely matched except at DPA1 and DPB1. Prior to the 3rd transplant, single antigen bead analysis (SAB) showed DSA reactivity against DPA1 shared by the 1st and 3rd donors, but B and T flow crossmatch (FXM) results were negative. Within 11days the 3rd transplant underwent acute C4d+ AMR which coincided with the presence of complement (C1q)-binding IgG1 DSA against donor DPA1 and DPB1. Using HLAMatchmaker and SAB, we provide evidence that eplet (epitope) spreading on DPA1 and eplet sharing on differing DPB1 alleles of the 1st and 3rd transplants was associated with AMR. Since weak DSA to DPA1/DPB1 may induce acute AMR with negative FXM, donor DPA1/DPB1 high resolution typing should be considered in sensitized patients with DP-directed DSA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Presensitization against a broad array of HLA is associated with prolonged waiting times and inferior kidney allogaft survival. Although the use of solid phase assay (SPA) for the detection and characterization of anti-HLA antibodies provides greater sensitivity than complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity (CDC) assay, it often detects donor specific antibodies (DSA) which turn out to be clinically irrelevant. Our data reinforce the concept that these two types of assays should be used in parallel for pre-and post-transplantation monitoring of anti-HLA antibodies in recipients of solid organ allografts. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: It has been known for 40 years that cytotoxic human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies are associated with graft rejection. However, the complement-dependent cytotoxicity assay (CDC) used to define these clinically deleterious antibodies suffers from a lack of sensitivity and specificity. Recently, methods exploiting immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody binding to HLA single antigen beads (SAB) have overcome sensitivity and specificity drawbacks but introduced a new dilemma: which of the much broader set of antibodies defined by these methods are clinically relevant. To address this, we developed a complement-fixing C1q assay on the HLA SAB that combines sensitivity, specificity, and functional potential into one assay. We compared the CDC, IgG, and C1q assays on 96 sera having 2,118 defined antibodies and determined that CDC detects only 19% of complement-fixing antibodies detected by C1q, whereas C1q detects only 47% of antibodies detected by IgG. In the same patient, there is no predictability by IgG mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) as to which of the antibodies will bind C1q because fixation is independent of MFI values. In 3 clinical studies, C1q+ antibodies appear to be more highly correlated than those detected by IgG alone for antibody-mediated rejection in hearts as well as for kidney transplant glomerulopathy and graft failure. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Antibodies against HLA antigens offer a window to the response of transplant recipients to the challenge of allografts. HLA alleles produced by recombinant technology and attached to color-coded polystyrene microspheres are now in widespread use. They offer antibody detection by flow cytometry at a high level of sensitivity. Methods used in the author''s laboratory for the interpretation of these tests are described. They include a correction for variable antigen density, and the binding of normal immunoglobulins to the conjugated beads. The ‘normalized ratio’ provides a good method of scoring results. Antibodies specific for the antigens of the donors were associated with kidney and heart allograft loss. Antibodies against crossreactive antigens, without reactivity against donor HLA, did not appear to increase the risk of developing chronic rejection. Antibody production by peripheral blood B cells was analyzed. The idea of sequestration of HLA antibodies in the graft as a major cause for their absence in the blood after transplantation is discussed. IgM antibodies against donor HLA antigens were found before transplantion and also were produced both early and late in the post-transplant course. In addition, IgM antibodies against donor HLA appeared to be associated with decreased survival of kidney and heart allografts. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Donor-specific HLA antibodies have been associated with acute and chronic rejection. Such antibodies may sometimes not be detected in recipient serum. In an attempt to learn about possible mechanisms, we investigated antibody production by recipient B lymphocytes in vitro. Peripheral blood B cells were obtained from 36 subjects, including 16 allograft recipients, 12 sensitized patients, three multiparous women with serum HLA antibodies, and five healthy non-transfused male subjects. Purified B cells were cultured with a cell line expressing CD40 ligand. Culture supernatants were screened for HLA antibodies, and positive samples were analyzed using single antigen beads to determine antibody specificity. HLA antibody–producing B cells were detected in persons known to be sensitized. In 13 of 16 allograft recipients, IgG antibodies against mismatched donor HLA antigens were observed, and donor-specific antibodies were sometimes produced in B-cell cultures when serum reactions were negative. IgM antibodies against HLA antigens were also identified in cultures from some transplant recipients. In two patients tested, the majority of antibody-producing B cells developed from CD27+ memory B cells. Our results suggest that analysis of B cells producing antibodies specific for donor antigens may be a useful tool for identifying and monitoring the humoral immune response in organ transplant recipients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Rituximab may induce positive B-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM) in the absence of donor-specific antibodies, as we report in these two cases. We retrospectively assessed the in vitro concentration-effect relationship of rituximab in sera. B-cell CDC-XM results were positive only in the presence of rituximab, even with low concentrations (inferior to 1 μg/mL). Moreover, rituximab neutralization with increasing concentration of an anti-rituximab-idiotype monoclonal antibody progressively reduced B-cell lysis. In conclusion, measurement of rituximab content may be useful to identify sera at risk of misinterpretation in immunized patients., (Copyright © 2013 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)