Search

Abstract: Sediments produced from eroding cultivated land can cause on‐site and off‐site effects that cause considerable economic and social impacts. Despite the importance of soil conservation practices (SCP) for the control of soil erosion and improvements in soil hydrological functions, limited information is available regarding the effects of SCP on sediment yield (SY) at the catchment scale. This study aimed to investigate the long‐term relationships between SY and land use, soil management, and rainfall in a small catchment. To determine the effects of anthropogenic and climatic factors on SY, rainfall, streamflow, and suspended sediment concentration were monitored at 10‐min intervals for 14 years (2002–2016), and the land use and soil management changes were surveyed annually. Using a statistical procedure to separate the SY effects of climate, land use, and soil management, we observed pronounced temporal effects of land use and soil management changes on SY. During the first 2 years (2002–2004), the land was predominantly cultivated with tobacco under a traditional tillage system (no cover crops and ploughed soil) using animal traction. In that period, the SY reached approximately 400 t·km−2·year−1. From 2005 to 2009, a soil conservation programme introduced conservation tillage and winter cover crops in the catchment area, which lowered the SY to 50 t·km−2·year−1. In the final period (2010–2016), the SCP were partially abandoned by farmers, and reforested areas increased, resulting in an SY of 150 t·km−2·year−1. This study also discusses the factors associated with the failure to continue using SCP, including structural support and farmer attitudes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents the study which explores the relationship between suspended sediment concentration (SSC) and turbidity for a small rural catchment in Brazil. It evaluates two calibration methods by comparing the SSC estimates obtained from the calibrated turbidity readings with direct measurements using the soil taxonomy system of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The first method is derived by relating the turbidity reading to simultaneous measurements of concentration obtained from SSC samples collected from the vicinity of the turbidity probe during flood events, while the second is based on the readings obtained from the turbidity meter when the probe immersed in samples using soils collected from the catchment. The study shows the efficiency of the first method over the second.