1. [Untitled]
- Author
-
V. I. Bronshtein
- Subjects
Engineering ,Hydraulic engineering ,business.industry ,Stiffness ,Ocean Engineering ,Structural engineering ,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology ,Rationalization (economics) ,Civil engineering ,General Energy ,Closure (computer programming) ,Hydroelectricity ,medicine ,Production (economics) ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Energy source ,Operating expense ,Water Science and Technology - Abstract
One of the principal progressive trends in the field of the design and construction of concrete dams is the regulation of their strength, which is directed toward improving the extent to which the strength properties of the concrete and bedrock are utilized, and providing equal strength to individual zones in the body of the dam, and ultimately reducing the volume of the structure and lowering its cost. Strength can be controlled either by varying the strength properties of the concrete, or what is more often practiced, by varying the stress-strain state (SSS) of the dam. Both structural, and also production methods can be used to regulate the strength. Structural methods directed toward the stress state of concrete dams, such as variation in the shape of the dam, the installation of a different kind of joints, hinges, interlayers, thermal insulation, prestressing of the dam, etc., are widely known, and many of them have become traditional for some time now. Rationalization of the building and loading sequence of the dam, optimization of closure temperatures, zoning of the concrete in the dam on the basis of strength, formation of favorable residual stresses in the construction period, use of concretes with different moduli to redistribute the stiffness of the structure, etc. are classed as production methods of strength regulation, which are favorably distinguished from structural methods by the fact that neither the shape of the dam, nor its operating scheme are changed, the static indefinableness of the structure is reduced, and no operating expenses are required. The decision to regulate strength using production measures can be adopted in virtually any stage of design or construction, since there is no need to alter basic design drawings. The cost to implement the production measures are, as a rule, low, and the saving may be significant. Despite the above-noted advantages of production methods of strength regulation, few studies have been devoted to their investigation (P. I. Vasil’ev, V. N. Durcheva, A. P. Epifanov, L. I. Malyshev, N. S. Rozanov, Ya. G. Skomorovskii, I. B. Sokolov, V. B. Sudakov, G. I. Chilingarishvili), particularly if we speak of these methods as applies to regulation of the stress-strain state (SSS) of the dam as a whole, and not its individual elements or regions of the structure’s body. Three types of production measures, the broad implementation of which promises no small technico-economic effect, are discussed below. Rationalization of Sequence of Construction, Monolithization, and Loading of Dam. Any possible acceleration of the start of commercial service of the generating sets at a hydroelectric plant to lower the volume of capital expenditures amortized over the long term is one of the most critical problems in hydraulic-power construction. This problem is solved by the staged introduction of generating sets when the dam is only partially completed. As a rule, the start-up complex includes the minimum volume of construction-assembly work required for
- Published
- 2001