Search

Background: Chronic kidney disease is frequently associated with hypertension and poorly controlled blood pressure can lead to chronic kidney disease progression. Finerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, significantly improves cardiorenal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. This analysis explored the relationship between office systolic blood pressure (SBP) and cardiorenal outcomes with finerenone in FIDELIO-DKD trial (Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease). Methods: Patients with type 2 diabetes, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio 30 to 5000 mg/g, and estimated glomerular filtration rate of 25 to 2 receiving optimized renin-angiotensin system blockade, were randomized to finerenone or placebo. For this analysis, patients (N=5669) were grouped by baseline office SBP quartiles. Results: Finerenone reduced office SBP across the baseline office SBP quartiles, including patients with baseline office SBP of >148 mm Hg. Overall, patients with lower baseline office SBP quartile and greater declines from baseline in SBP were associated with better cardiorenal outcomes. The risk of primary kidney and key secondary cardiovascular composite outcomes was consistently reduced with finerenone versus placebo irrespective of baseline office SBP quartiles ( P for interaction 0.87 and 0.78, respectively). A time-varying analysis revealed that 13.8% and 12.6% of the treatment effect with finerenone was attributed to the change in office SBP for the primary kidney composite outcome and the key secondary cardiovascular outcome, respectively. Conclusions: In FIDELIO-DKD, cardiorenal outcomes improved with finerenone irrespective of baseline office SBP. Reductions in office SBP accounted for a small proportion of the treatment effect on cardiorenal outcomes. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02540993.

The prognostic relevance of short-term blood pressure (BP) variability in hypertension is not clearly established. We aimed to evaluate the association of short-term BP variability, assessed through ambulatory BP monitoring, with total and cardiovascular mortality in a large cohort of patients with hypertension. We selected 63 910 subjects from the Spanish ABPM Registry from 2004 to 2014, with a median follow-up of 4.7 years. Systolic and diastolic BP SD from 24 hours, daytime, and nighttime, weighted SD (mean of daytime and nighttime SD weighted for period duration), average real variability (mean of differences between consecutive readings), variation independent of the mean, and BP variability ratio (ratio between systolic and diastolic 24-hour SD) were calculated through 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring performed at baseline. Association with total and cardiovascular mortality (obtained through death certificates) were assessed by Cox regression models adjusted for clinical confounders and BP. Patients who died during follow-up had higher values of BP variability compared with those remaining alive. In fully adjusted models, daytime, nighttime, and weighted SD, systolic and diastolic, as well as diastolic average real variability, were all significantly associated with total and cardiovascular mortality. Hazard ratios for 1 SD increase ranged from 1.05 to 1.09 for total mortality and from 1.07 to 1.12 for cardiovascular mortality. A nighttime systolic SD ≥12 mm Hg was independently associated with total (hazard ratio: 1.13 [95% CI, 1.06–1.21]) and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio: 1.21 [95% CI, 1.09–1.36]). We conclude that short-term BP variability is independently associated with total and cardiovascular mortality in patients with hypertension.

Albuminuria is a risk factor strongly associated with cardiovascular disease, the first cause of death in the general population. It is well established that renin–angiotensin system suppressors prevent the development of new-onset albuminuria in naïf hypertensive patients and diminish its excretion, but we cannot forget the percentage of hypertensive patients who develop de novo albuminuria. Here, we applied multiple proteomic strategy with the purpose to elucidate specific molecular pathways involved in the pathogenesis and provide predictors and chronic organ damage indicators. Briefly, 1143 patients were followed up for a minimum period of 3 years. One hundred and twenty-nine hypertensive patients chronically renin–angiotensin system suppressed were recruited, classified in 3 different groups depending on their albuminuria levels (normoalbuminuria, de novo albuminuria, and sustained albuminuria), and investigated by multiple proteomic strategies. Our strategy allowed us to perform one of the deepest plasma proteomic analysis to date, which has shown 2 proteomic signatures: (1) with predictive value of de novo albuminuria and (2) sustained albuminuria indicator proteins. These proteins are involved in inflammation, immune as well as in the proteasome activation occurring in situations of endoplasmic reticulum stress. Furthermore, these results open the possibility of a future strategy based on anti-immune therapy to treat hypertension which could help to prevent the development of albuminuria and, hence, the progression of kidney damage.

Microalbuminuria is a known marker of subclinical organ damage. Its prevalence is higher in patients with resistant hypertension than in subjects with blood pressure at goal. On the other hand, some patients with apparently well-controlled hypertension still have microalbuminuria. The current study aimed to determine the relationship between microalbuminuria and both office and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure. A cohort of 356 patients (mean age 64±11 years; 40.2% females) with resistant hypertension (blood pressure ≥140 and/or 90 mm Hg despite treatment with ≥3 drugs, diuretic included) were selected from Spanish hypertension units. Patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate 2 were excluded. All patients underwent clinical and demographic evaluation, complete laboratory analyses, and good technical-quality 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Urinary albumin/creatinine ratio was averaged from 3 first-morning void urine samples. Microalbuminuria (urinary albumin/creatinine ratio ≥2.5 mg/mmol in males or ≥3.5 mg/mmol in females) was detected in 46.6%, and impaired renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate 2 ) was detected in 26.8%. Bivariate analyses showed significant associations of microalbuminuria with older age, reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate, increased nighttime systolic blood pressure, and elevated daytime, nighttime, and 24-hour diastolic blood pressure. In a logistic regression analysis, after age and sex adjustment, elevated nighttime systolic blood pressure (multivariate odds ratio, 1.014 [95% CI, 1.001 to 1.026]; P =0.029) and reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (multivariate odds ratio, 2.79 [95% CI, 1.57 to 4.96]; P =0.0005) were independently associated with the presence of microalbuminuria. We conclude that microalbuminuria is better associated with increased nighttime systolic blood pressure than with any other office and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring parameters.

Goal blood pressure (BP) was defined by the Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-VI) and the World Health Organization–International Society of Hypertension (WHO/ISH) as 1 g/d. Poorer BP control was observed among patients at high risk, with diabetes, renal disease, or obesity, than in lower-risk groups. BP control was lower for systolic than for diastolic BP. In >50% of uncontrolled patients, no measures were taken by doctors to optimize pharmacologic treatment, and approximately one-third of patients were still using drug monotherapy. Control of BP, particularly of systolic BP, is still far from optimal in hospital-based hypertension units. Patients at high risk, with diabetes or proteinuria, warrant focused attention. Moreover, a more aggressive behavior of doctors treating uncontrolled hypertension is needed.

Microalbuminuria in diabetes is a risk factor for early death and an indicator for aggressive blood pressure (BP) lowering. We compared a combination of 2 mg perindopril/0.625 mg indapamide with enalapril monotherapy on albumin excretion rate (AER) in patients with type 2 diabetes, albuminuria, and hypertension in a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group international multicenter study. Four hundred eighty-one patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension (systolic BP ≥140 mm Hg, 20 and P =0.012; systolic BP −1.5 [95% CI −3.0, −0.1] diastolic BP P =0.019) and AER −42% (95% CI −50%, −33%) versus −27% (95% CI −37%, −16%) with enalapril. The greater AER reduction remained significant after adjustment for mean BP. Adverse events were similar in the 2 groups. Thus, first-line treatment with low-dose combination perindopril/indapamide induces a greater decrease in albuminuria than enalapril, partially independent of BP reduction. A BP-independent effect of the combination may increase renal protection.

To investigate the impact of treatment on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, we assessed outcomes in patients with hypertension and diabetes who received co-amilozide or nifedipine in the International Nifedipine GITS Study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension. Participants had to be 55 to 80 years of age, with hypertension (≥150/95 or ≥160 mm Hg) and at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor. Patients received 30 mg nifedipine once daily or co-amilozide (25 mg hydrochlorothiazide and 2.5 mg amiloride) daily. Doses were doubled if target blood pressures (P =1.00). A significant benefit for nifedipine-treated patients was seen for the composite secondary outcome (14.2% versus 18.7%; relative risk, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.97; P =0.03). Among patients without diabetes at baseline (n=5019), there was a significant difference in the incidence of new diabetes (nifedipine 4.3% versus co-amilozide 5.6%, P =0.023). Nifedipine GITS once daily is as effective as diuretic therapy in reducing cardiovascular complications in hypertensive diabetics. Nifedipine-treated patients were also less likely to have diabetes or have secondary events (a composite of all-cause mortality, death from a vascular cause, and death from a nonvascular cause) than co-amilozide recipients. Our results suggest that nifedipine could be considered as first-line therapy for hypertensive diabetics.

Data remain insufficient to place the decreased response to l -arginine in hypertensive patients within a consistent pathophysiological sequence. The aim of the present study in patients with essential hypertension was to assess the relationships between the response to l -arginine and a set of relevant clinical and laboratory parameters. In this prospective, interventional study, we administered l -arginine to untreated hypertensive individuals and healthy control subjects and measured the clearance of inulin and of para -aminohippurate and a set of biochemical and clinical variables. l -Arginine infusion revealed major differences between control subjects and 1 subgroup (group B) of hypertensive individuals. Group B hypertensives (n=18) had no increase in inulin clearance and no decrease in renal vascular resistance with l -arginine; however, in another subset of hypertensive patients (group A, n=27), the insulin clearance increased and renal vascular resistance decreased similar to the control group (group C, n=11). The ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in group B showed both an increased mean diastolic pressure and a “nondipper” pattern in the nocturnal regulation of arterial pressure. These findings in group B were accompanied by significant alterations in optic fundus and left ventricle hypertrophy and increased microalbuminuria (all, P l -arginine. Our results may help to understand the mechanisms that lead to target organ damage in hypertension.

Abstract — — This article debates the important question of whether blood pressure lowering alone is responsible for the benefits accrued from antihypertensive therapy as demonstrated in many multicenter randomized clinical trials with different antihypertensive agents or whether there is evidence that some agents have special properties that result in benefits that go beyond those resulting from lowering blood pressure. Over the past ≥30 years, it has been demonstrated beyond any doubt that lowering blood pressure in severe forms of hypertension, and more recently in systolic and even mild hypertension, will result in reduced incidence of stroke and slower progression of heart and renal failure. These effects have been easier to demonstrate in sicker patients, because enough end points may be counted in the 3 to 5 years that these clinical trials last. However, risk attributable to high blood pressure comes, to a greater degree, from the much larger group of hypertensive individuals who have less severe forms of hypertension. Blood pressure lowering offers less protection from coronary heart disease, which is highly prevalent in hypertensive patients, than from stroke. With the introduction of agents such as renin-angiotensin system inhibitors or calcium channel blockers, it has been demonstrated that hypertensive vascular remodeling and endothelial dysfunction may be corrected. It has therefore been suggested that benefits beyond blood pressure lowering may be achieved with the use of specific drugs to lower blood pressure. Although some evidence suggests that this may be the case, it is difficult to extrapolate from mechanistic studies to prevention of hard end points in outcome trials and vice versa. The question remains for the time being largely unanswered.

Abstract — — Nephrosclerosis constitutes a major cause of end-stage renal disease. Independently of blood pressure control, ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) are considered to be more nephroprotective than other antihypertensive agents. We have reviewed the long-term evolution of renal function in our series of essential hypertensive patients diagnosed as having nephrosclerosis when first seen in our unit. The analysis was performed depending on whether or not their antihypertensive therapy contained an ACEI alone or in combination for the whole follow-up. The end point was defined as the confirmation of a 50% reduction in creatinine clearance or entry in a dialysis program. A historical cohort of 295 patients was included in the analysis. Mean follow-up was 7.4±3.9 years. Diabetes prevalence was higher in ACEI-treated patients (25.7% versus 7.1%, P =0.000), but the diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy could not be confirmed on clinical grounds, including renal biopsy. Twenty-three out of 183 (12.6%) patients in the ACEI group and 23 out of 112 (20.5%) patients in the non-ACEI group experienced a renal event ( P =0.0104 by log rank test). Similar results were observed when only nondiabetic patients were considered for the analysis. Cox regression analysis showed that baseline serum creatinine, absence of ACEI administration, mean proteinuria during follow-up, and age were independent predictors for the development of a renal event. In hypertensive nephrosclerosis, therapy containing an ACEI alone or in combination significantly reduces the incidence of renal events. This effect is independent of blood pressure control.

Abstract —The objective of this study was to establish whether ambulatory blood pressure offers a better estimate of cardiovascular risk than does its clinical blood pressure counterpart in refractory hypertension. This prospective study assessed the incidence of cardiovascular events over time during an average follow-up of 49 months (range, 6 to 96). Patients were referred to specialized hypertension clinics (86 essential hypertension patients who had diastolic blood pressure >100 mm Hg during antihypertensive treatment that included three or more antihypertensive drugs, one being a diuretic). Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed at the time of entrance. End-organ damage was monitored yearly, and the incidence of cardiovascular events was recorded. Patients were divided into tertiles of average diastolic blood pressure during activity according to the ABPM, with the lowest tertile 97 mm Hg (HT, n=28). While significant differences in systolic and diastolic ambulatory blood pressures were observed among groups, no differences were observed at either the beginning or at the time of the last evaluation for office blood pressure. During the last evaluation, a progression in the end-organ damage score was observed for the HT group but not for the two other groups. Twenty-one of the patients had a new cardiovascular event; the incidence of events was significantly lower for the LT group (2.2 per 100 patient-years) than it was for the MT group (9.5 per 100 patient-years) or for the HT group (13.6 per 100 patient-years). The probability of event-free survival was also significantly different when comparing the LT group with the other two groups (LT versus MT log-rank, P P P

Characterization of the renal effects of calcium entry blockers has not been easy because the inhibition of Ca2+ cellular influx alters several regulatory functions. The ability of calcium blockers to dilate renal vasculature and to increase glomerular filtration rate is largely determined by the preexisting vascular tone. However, the increments in sodium excretion could occur without alterations in renal hemodynamics. Calcium blockers could increase sodium excretion by inducing a redistribution of renal blood flow toward juxtamedullary nephrons, by inhibiting tubuloglomerular feedback responses, or by a direct action on the tubular transport of sodium. These effects are poorly understood at present. In vitro studies show that the blockade of calcium entry enhances renin secretion and decreases prostaglandin synthesis. This dissociation has not been found during long-term administration, which has been proved to be effective for the treatment of essential hypertension with normal maintenance of renal function. In this respect, there are reports indicating that calcium blockers are particularly effective in a subgroup of patients with essential hypertension who exhibit subtle but detectable alterations in calcium metabolism. Further studies are needed to determine whether this significant response to calcium blockers is due to correction of an early defect of calcium cellular kinetics that initiated the increase in blood pressure.

The prolonged effects (42 days) of indomethacin treatment on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis, renal hemodynamics, and renal excretory function in humans were studied. Indomethacin produced a 41% sustained depression in the 24-hour excretion of prostaglandin E2 and a mild (7%) decrease in inulin clearance but did not affect the clearance of p-aminohippurate, the 24-hour excretion of sodium and potassium, or the basal values of plasma aldosterone; however, it decreased the basal values of renin and prevented the stimulated (3 hours of walking) responses of plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone. Indomethacin also produced a decrease in both the diuretic and saluretic response to furosemide and in the renal ability to concentrate urine. The indomethacin-induced hyporeninism and hypoaldosteronism were more pronounced when the subjects were receiving a sodium-restricted diet. This finding indicates that prolonged administration of anti-inflammatory drugs induces chronic hyporeninism and hypoaldosteronism. Prolonged treatment with indomethacin also produced some of the symptoms of a syndrome of hypoprostaglandinism, such as decreased plasma renin activity, plasma aldosterone, and urinary prostaglandin E2 in association with increases in plasma potassium levels and diastolic pressure.