Search

This book comprises a selection of papers presented at the IPET 2008 symposium that took place at the Royal Academy of Engineering in London in November 2008 and at the following workshop at the Colorado School of Mines. It is the second volume in a series that emanated from a workshop on Philosophy in Engineering that took place at the University of Delft in October 2007 and that began a continuing series of workshops named by the acronym IPET followed by the year of the workshop. Prior to that, there had been three significant publications that had illustrated the value of pursuing the relationship between philosophy and engineering, and engineering education. The success of this 2007 University of Delft workshop led to IPET 2008 being held at the Royal Academy of Engineering in London. While the focus of both volumes is on engineering, necessarily many of the papers have implications for engineering education. It would be surprising if the three individuals invited to review this book were able to agree upon a conclusion. They did indeed have different views; this seems to be because their views differed of who was likely to read this book. A reader may infer the editors? intentions from the questions put to Mitcham, but it is harder to infer the intended audience. One of the reviewers takes the view that a collection of papers of the calibre presented will attract a like-minded set of readers, and so responded to the questions put to Mitcham with that group in mind. Another thought the book would be suited to engineering educators more generally, and as a result was effusive in its praise. The fundamental questions that need to be answered are ?What value do these papers have for engineering educators?? and ?What value do they have for their students?? While the editors have not focused on engineering and technological literacy, a number of chapters are of considerable importance to those who promote study in these areas. The chapters on peace engineering and the use of robotics in warfare are examples of this. Of the series of papers on the philosophy of technology adoption over the last two decades, some are summarized in Ch. 23 by Houkes and Pols. This chapter focuses on the designer?user system in terms of what the authors' call Rational Acceptance Technology (RAT), one aspect of which is control. They point out that in designing artefacts, designers hand over a measure of control to the users. RAT requires that the user has partial responsibility for failure. For instance, guarantees and insurance for domestic electrical goods are careful to note improper use as an exclusion from the guarantee. From the reviewers' perspective, the answer to the first of the questions put to Mitcham is that this volume contributes to the establishment of a philosophy of engineering. It now requires an authority to provide a synthesis of the numerous articles that have been published in this area with that in mind. A good starting point would be for the organizers of these and similar workshops to call for some focused review papers, to which the reviewers and readers of this book can look forward to with great anticipation. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

This article is an extension of a work in progress paper originally presented at the conference FiE 2020, Frontiers in Education by (Schirichian et al., 2020), as a result of Schirichian’s master’s in science dissertation. It studies the relations between academic performance, protection factors, life at university, and personal characteristics to understand how they influence students’ academic success in undergraduate engineering programs in Brazil. In this challenging environment, several students overcome these issues and graduate, which indicates that some protection structures allow students to face challenging situations and be successful in their studies. Current research studied the relationships between academic performance, self-efficacy, causal attributions, personal characteristics, and life at university, with a group of 30 students. Models were studied by combining the different variables and aspects evaluated in the research, and the findings show relationship between academic performance and: 1) self-efficacy, causal attributions, and personal characteristics (such as leisure activities, living with their parents, or college accommodations) and those who attended private schools during basic education; 2 protection factors self-efficacy and causal attributions with advancing in the program and the time of enrolment in the university; and 3) the dimensions initiation and persistence, success/internality and failure/internality, indicating that those who perceive themselves as playing a major role in their academic journey tend to have better outcomes. Further results show the influence of social inequalities, particularly for those students who declared themselves brown and who conducted their basic education in public schools (which are generally of lower quality than private ones in Brazil). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Plagiarism is more than just the failure to use quotation marks or to cite a paraphrased passage. Dual publishing, self-plagiarism, and ghost authorship are other forms of plagiarism. Plagiarism is generally viewed as an act when, in fact, it is a decision process. Five steps are used here to represent plagiarism as a decision process. Various forms of pressure act as stimuli to begin the process, and rationalization is used to justify the decision and to avoid feelings of regret. Education is necessary to decrease the likelihood that an individual will opt to plagiarize when faced with the opportunity. Considerations for education of graduate students and young faculty are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Engineering is a serving profession. During the least century, engineering curricula have become technology and process focused to the detriment of the "soft skills" so necessary for a professional. This paper proposes that engineering curricula undergo major revisions to return to the original service mission of the profession. The key elements for a renaissance within engineering education are presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Contribution: This article measures the impact of a service-learning project in a first-year introduction to computing course on students’ understanding of engineers’ roles and responsibilities and their attitudes toward plastic pollution. Background: Service learning has been integrated into classrooms for many years, but its utilization in engineering courses is lacking. Furthermore, plastic pollution is a complex and multidisciplinary problem that requires social, political, environmental, and engineering solutions. This work provides a quantitative assessment on whether service learning through a litter pickup project impacts students’ views of the role of engineers in solving complex sociotechnical problems. Research Questions: 1) How does service learning change students’ perception of an engineer’s role in solving sociotechnical problems? and 2) how can service learning be used to increase students’ environmental awareness and action? Methodology: Surveys were administered to students before and after their participation in a service-learning project. The study was conducted across five sections of an introduction to a computer programming course that is required of first-year civil, electrical, and mechanical engineering students. Findings: After the service-learning project, students were more likely to agree that engineers have the skills, knowledge, and responsibility to solve societal problems. Students also demonstrated a more holistic understanding of plastic pollution and reported changes in their waste reduction behaviors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Contributions: The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK)-Jockey Club AI for the Future Project (AI4Future) co-created the first pretertiary AI curriculum at the secondary school level for Hong Kong and evaluated its efficacy. This study added to the AI education community by introducing a new AI curriculum framework. The preposttest multifactors evaluation about students’ perceptions of AI learning confirmed that the curriculum is effective in promoting AI learning. The teachers also confirmed the co-creation process enhanced their capacity to implement AI education. Background: AI4Future is a cross-sector project that engages five major partners—CUHK’s Faculty of Engineering and Faculty of Education, secondary schools, Hong Kong government, and AI industry. A team of 14 professors collaborated with 17 principals and teachers from six secondary schools to co-create the curriculum. Research Questions: Would the curriculum significantly improve the student perceived competence, attitude, and motivation toward AI learning? How does the co-creation process benefit the implementation of the curriculum? Methodology: The participants were 335 students and eight teachers from the secondary schools. This study adopted a mix-method with quantitative data measures at pre- and post-questionnaires and qualitative data emphasizes teachers’ perspectives on the co-creation process. Paired ${t}$ -tests and ANCOVAs, and thematic analysis were used to analyze the data. Findings: 1) students perceived greater competence and developed a more positive attitude to learn AI and 2) the co-creation process enhanced teachers’ knowledge in AI, as well as fostered teachers’ autonomy in bringing the subject matter into their classrooms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Contribution: This article demonstrates that social, cultural, economic, and political topics can be effectively addressed in the context of traditional computer science and engineering topics with few additional resources and little coordination. Background: Social, cultural, economic, and political influences are often secondary topics in computer science and engineering curricula. Superficial treatment of these topics can impede future graduates by limiting their understanding of how global factors influence the design of products, the availability of consumers, and future employment. Research Question: Are there ways to effectively integrate coverage of global issues and technical course material that sacrifice little class time and require few resources? If so, which activities and tools are most effective? Methodology: Computer networking students were introduced to the well-known networking tools Traceroute and WHOIS. Students were required to successfully use these tools for a graded assignment. After finding the country of origin with a visual Traceroute tool, students chose an article reporting on a technical topic in the social, cultural, political, or economic context of one of the origin countries. Students answered questions regarding their previous and new knowledge on the graded assignment and then reported the effectiveness of the activities in encouraging global awareness on an anonymous questionnaire. Findings: Students reported little previous knowledge of all countries included in the assignment but found the assignment useful in learning about global influences within the context of traditional networking tools. Furthermore, students reported differences in what activity during the assignment was most effective when learning about global issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Course work plagiarism among university students is often attributed to ignorance about plagiarism or an assignment's level of difficulty. Students submit other people's work when they are unable to solve an assignment themselves. This study, based on 233 student responses from four cultural regions, investigates three aspects of academic dishonesty. First, the study identifies students' preferred strategies for managing perceptually too difficult course work. Second, students' preferences for responding to help from fellow students are investigated. Finally, the study measures students' preferences for choosing side in ethical conflicts. Seven strategies for managing difficult course work, six strategies for responding to requests for help, and five key parties in ethical conflicts are studied using a pair-wise comparison method. The results show that students prefer to collaborate and use the Internet. The impact of the teacher is smaller than expected. Factors including cultural origin, gender, level of study, and field of study have limited impact. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]