Search

Three underfill options compatible with lead-free assembly have been evaluated: capillary underfill, fluxing underfill, and corner bond underfill. Chip scale packages (CSPs) with eutectic Sn/Pb solder were used for control samples. Without underfill, lead-free and Sn/Pb eutectic drop test results were comparable. Capillary flow underfills, dispensed and cured after reflow, are commonly used in CSP assembly with eutectic Sn/Pb solder. With capillary flow underfill, the drop test results were significantly better with lead-free solder assembly than with Sn/Pb eutectic. Fluxing underfill is dispensed at the CSP site prior to CSP placement. No solder paste is printed at the site. The CSP is placed and reflowed in a standard reflow cycle. A new fluxing underfill developed for compatibility with the higher lead-free solder reflow profiles was investigated. The fluxing underfill with lead-free solder yielded the best drop test results. Corner bond underfill is dispensed as four dots corresponding to the four corners of the CSP after solder paste print, but before CSP placement. The corner bond material cures during the reflow cycle. It is a simpler process compared to capillary or fluxing underfill. The drop test results with corner bond were intermediate between no underfill and capillary underfill and similar for both lead-free and Sn/Pb eutectic solder assembly. The effect of aging on the drop test results with lead-free solder and either no underfill or corner bond underfill was studied. Tin/lead solder with no underfill was used for control. This test was to simulate drop performance after the product has been placed in service for some period of time. There was degradation in the drop test results in all cases after 100 and 250 h of storage at 125°C prior to the drop test. The worst degradation occurred with the lead-free solder with no underfill. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The use of chip-scale packages (CSPs) has expanded rapidly, particularly in portable electronic products. Many CSP designs will meet the thermal cycle or thermal shock requirements for these applications. However, mechanical shock (drop) and bending requirements often necessitate the use of underfills to increase the mechanical strength of the CSP-to-board connection. Capillary flow underfills processed after reflow provide the most common solution to improving mechanical reliability. However, capillary underfill dispense, flow, and cure steps and the associated equipment add cost and complexity to the assembly process. Corner bonding provides an alternate approach. Dots of underfill are dispensed at the four corners of the CSP site after solder paste print but before CSP placement. During reflow, the underfill cures, providing mechanical coupling between the CSP and the board at the corners of the CSP. Since only small areas of underfill are used, board dehydration is not required. This paper examines the manufacturing process for corner bonding including dispense volume, CSP placement, and reflow. Drop test results are then presented. A conventional, capillary process was used for comparison of drop test results. Test results with corner bonding were intermediate between complete capillary underfill and nonunderfilled CSPs. Finite-element modeling results for the drop test are also included. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Fine pitch BGAs and chip scale packages have been developed as an alternative to direct flip chip attachment for high-density electronics. The larger solder sphere diameter and higher standoff of CSPs and fine pitch BGAs improve thermal cycle reliability while the larger pitch relaxes wiring congestion on the printed wiring board. Fine pitch BGAs and CSPs also allow rework to replace defective devices. Thermal cycle reliability has been shown to meet many consumer application requirements. However, fine pitch BGAs and CSPs have difficulty passing mechanical shock and substrate flexing tests for portable electronics applications. The fine pitch BGA used in the study was a 10 mm package with the die wire bonded. The package substrate was bismaleimide-triazine (BT) and the solder sphere diameter was 0.56 mm. Two types of underfill were examined. The first was a fast flow, snap cure underfill. This material rapidly flows under the package and can be cured in five minutes at 165°C using an in-line convection oven. The second underfill was a thermally reworkable underfill for those applications requiring device removal and replacement. The paper discusses the assembly and rework process. In addition, liquid-to-liquid thermal shock data is presented along with mechanical shock and flexing test results [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

This paper examines the assembly process for flip chip die with SnAgCu solder bumps and the results of liquid-to-liquid thermal shock testing. The SnAgCu alloy required a thicker dip layer of flux to achieve good wetting compared to the SnPb eutectic alloy. A liquid spray flux yielded more consistent solder wetting with the SnAgCu alloy. With both fluxes, a nitrogen reflow atmosphere was necessary with the SnAgCu alloy. A peak reflow temperature of 246°C was used for the assembly of the SnAgCu thermal shock test vehicles. A lower peak temperature of 235°C did not yield sufficient solder wetting. Liquid-to-liquid thermal shock testing was performed from -40°C to +125°C. The SnPb alloy performed slightly better than the SnAgCu and the dip flux was better that the spray flux. The degree of delamination with the SnAgCu alloy was significantly higher than with the SnPb alloy. Cracks in the underfill between adjacent solder balls were observed. The SnPb alloy extruded into these cracks more readily than the SnAgCu and created electrical shorts [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]