Search

The aim of this paper was to estimate soil moisture in agricultural crop fields from fully polarimetric L-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data through the polarimetric decomposition of the SAR coherency matrix. A nonnegative-eigenvalue-decomposition scheme, together with an adaptive volume scattering model, is extended to an adaptive model-based decomposition (MBD) (Adaptive MBD) model for soil moisture retrieval. The Adaptive MBD can ensure nonnegative decomposed scattering components and allows two parameters (i.e., the mean orientation angle and a degree of randomness) to be determined to characterize the volume scattering. Its performance was tested using airborne SAR data and coincident ground measurements collected over agricultural fields in southeastern Australia and compared with previous MBD methods (i.e., the Freeman three-component decomposition using the extended Bragg model, the Yamaguchi three-component decomposition, and an iterative generalized hybrid decomposition). The results obtained with the newly proposed decomposition scheme agreed well with expectations based on observed plant structure and biomass levels. The new method was superior in tracking soil moisture dynamics with respect to previous decomposition methods in our study area, with root-mean-square error of soil moisture estimations being 0.10 and 0.14 m3/m3, respectively, for surface and double-bounce components. However, large variability in the achieved soil moisture accuracy was observed, depending on the presence of row structures in the underlying soil surface. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The backscatter predicted by three common surface scattering models (the Integral Equation Model (IEM), the Dubois, and the Oh models) was evaluated against fully polarized L-band airborne observations. Before any site-specific calibration, the Oh model was found to be the most accurate among the three, with mean errors between the simulated and the observed backscatter of 1.2 dB ( ±2.6 dB standard deviation of the error) and -0.4 dB ( ±2.4 dB) for HH and VV polarizations, respectively, while the IEM and Dubois presented larger errors, with a maximum of 4.5 dB ( ±2 dB) for the IEM in VV polarization. The backscatter errors were observed to be related to surface roughness, another major factor determining the electromagnetic scattering at the soil surface. An existing semiempirical calibration of the surface roughness correlation length was therefore applied to improve the mismatch between modeled and observed backscatters. The application of the semiempirical calibration led to a significant improvement of the backscatter prediction for the IEM. After calibration, the IEM outperformed the Oh model, resulting in a mean backscatter error of -0.3 dB ( ±1.1 dB) and -0.2 ( ±1.2 dB) for HH and VV polarizations, respectively. To test the robustness of the semiempirical calibration, calibration functions derived from an independent data set were applied and shown to also improve the (uncalibrated) IEM performance, suggesting that the calibration procedure is relatively robust for global application. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

This paper investigated the effectiveness of frequently used parametric and nonparametric models for biomass retrieval from L-band radar backscatter. Two areas, one in Spain and one in Australia, characterized by different tree species, forest structure, and field sampling designs were selected to demonstrate that retrieval error metrics are similar for different local conditions and sampling characteristics. A mixed-model retrieval strategy was proposed to reduce the overall (i.e., across the entire biomass range) as well as by-biomass-interval errors. Significant relationships were found between aboveground biomass and radar backscatter with most of the backscatter dynamic range being limited to a fairly low range of biomass values ( t/ha) in both study areas. Biomass retrieval errors were largely similar for all parametric and nonparametric models tested. However, some parametric models consistently provided lower correlation between the observed and the predicted biomass while nonparametric models generally provided an unbiased estimation. A mixed-model retrieval strategy was shown to reduce biomass estimation errors by up to 15%. Biomass retrieval errors were highly variable within the L-band sensitivity interval, suggesting that overall accuracy estimates should be used with care, particularly for low biomass intervals ( t/ha) where surface scattering could dominate the total backscatter. Despite exhibiting the highest dynamic range, low biomass areas were characterized by the highest estimation errors (in excess of 80%). Conversely, relative estimation errors were as low as 20%-35% for the 30-75 t/ha biomass intervals, while at higher biomass levels, the estimation error increased due to signal saturation. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

NASA's SoilMoisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission will carry the first combined spaceborne L-band radiometer and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) system with the objective of mapping near-surface soil moisture and freeze/thaw state globally every 2-3 days. SMAP will provide three soil moisture products: i) high-resolution from radar (~3 km), ii) low-resolution from radiometer (~36 km), and iii) intermediate-resolution from the fusion of radar and radiometer (~9 km). The Soil Moisture Active Passive Experiments (SMAPEx) are a series of three airborne field experiments designed to provide prototype SMAP data for the development and validation of soil moisture retrieval algorithms applicable to the SMAP mission. This paper describes the SMAPEx sampling strategy and presents an overview of the data collected during the three experiments: SMAPEx-1 (July 5-10, 2010), SMAPEx-2 (December 4-8, 2010) and SMAPEx-3 (September 5-23, 2011). The SMAPEx experiments were conducted in a semi-arid agricultural and grazing area located in southeastern Australia, timed so as to acquire data over a seasonal cycle at various stages of the crop growth. Airborne L-band brightness temperature (~1 km) and radar backscatter (~10 m) observations were collected over an area the size of a single SMAP footprint (38 km × 36 km at 35° latitude) with a 2-3 days revisit time, providing SMAP-like data for testing of radiometer-only, radar-only and combined radiometer-radar soil moisture retrieval and downscaling algorithms. Airborne observations were supported by continuous monitoring of near-surface (0-5 cm) soil moisture along with intensive ground monitoring of soil moisture, soil temperature, vegetation biomass and structure, and surface roughness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The National Airborne Field Experiment 2005 (NAFE'05) and the Campaign for validating the Operation of Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (CoSMOS) were undertaken in November 2005 in the Goulburn River catchment, which is located in southeastern Australia. The objective of the joint campaign was to provide simulated Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) observations using airborne L-band radiometers supported by soil moisture and other relevant ground data for the following: 1) the development of SMOS soil moisture retrieval algorithms; 2) developing approaches for downscaling the low-resolution data from SMOS; and 3) testing its assimilation into land surface models for root zone soil moisture retrieval. This paper describes the NAFE'05 and CoSMOS airborne data sets together with the ground data collected in support of both aircraft campaigns. The airborne L-band acquisitions included 40 km x 40 km coverage flights at 500-rn and 1-km resolution for the simulation of a SMOS pixel, multiresolution flights with ground resolution ranging from 1 km to 62.5 m, multiangle observations, and specific flights that targeted the vegetation dew and sun glint effect on L-band soil moisture retrieval. The L-band data were accompanied by airborne thermal infrared and optical measurements. The ground data consisted of continuous soil moisture profile measurements at 18 monitoring sites throughout the 40 km x 40 km study area and extensive spatial near-surface soil moisture measurements concurrent with airborne monitoring. Additionally, data were collected on rock coverage and temperature, surface roughness, skin and soil temperatures, dew amount, and vegetation water content and biomass. These data are available at www.nafe.unimelb. edu.au. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission, launched in January 2015, was designed to provide a global soil moisture product at medium resolution (~9 km), by combining observations from its radar and radiometer. Several downscaling methods have been proposed by the SMAP team for this purpose. This paper evaluates another candidate downscaling method, namely, the Bayesian merging approach. While this has been tested using a synthetic data set across the USA, it is imperative that it can also be tested using the experimental data for a comprehensive range of land surface conditions (i.e., in different hydro-climatic regions) prior to a global application. Consequently, this paper applies this method using the data collected from SMAP experiments field campaigns in south-eastern Australia that closely simulated the SMAP data stream for a single SMAP radiometer pixel over a three-week interval. The method studied here differs from the linear downscaling methods of the SMAP mission, in that it uses a nonlinear method based on Bayes’ theorem. The medium-resolution soil moisture product is obtained using background soil moisture estimates that are updated according to the difference between the observed and predicted brightness temperatures and backscatter coefficients, relating the high- and low-resolution data. Results were assessed against a reference soil moisture map derived from high-resolution airborne radiometer observations. The root-mean-square-error and R^2 for the Bayesian merging method were found to be 0.02 cm3/cm3 and 0.55, respectively, at 9-km resolution, being similar to the SMAP’s “optional” downscaling method. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

NASA's Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission will provide a ~10-km resolution global soil moisture product with a 2-3-day revisit by exploiting the synergy between active and passive observations. However, soil moisture downscaling techniques required to exploit this synergy have not yet received extensive testing, being limited to mostly synthetic data. Consequently, airborne field campaigns such as the SMAP Experiments (SMAPEx) have been designed to provide experimental data to fill this gap. The objective of this study is to assess the reliability of SMAP prototype data stream derived from airborne observations, with the aim of providing a simulated SMAP data set for prelaunch algorithm development of SMAP. Specifically, the reliability of incidence-angle normalization and spatial resolution aggregation for airborne observations was assessed for this purpose. The impact of azimuthal angle on active-passive observations was analyzed to assess the potential influence of SMAP rotating antenna on observations. Results showed that the accuracies of angle normalization were ~0.8 dB for active and 2.4 K for the passive observations (1-km resolution), while the uncertainties associated with spatial upscaling were 2.7 dB (150-m resolution) and 2 K (1-km resolution). Although azimuthal signatures associated with the variable orientation of surface features were observed in the high-resolution observations, these tended to be smoothed when aggregating to coarser resolution. As these errors are expected to decrease further at the coarser resolution of SMAP, results suggested that data from SMAPEx can be reliably used to simulate SMAP data for subsequent use in active-passive soil moisture algorithm development. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

A downscaling approach to improve the spatial resolution of Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) soil moisture estimates with the use of higher resolution visible/infrared (VIS/IR) satellite data is presented. The algorithm is based on the so-called “universal triangle” concept that relates VIS/IR parameters, such as the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and Land Surface Temperature (Ts), to the soil moisture status. It combines the accuracy of SMOS observations with the high spatial resolution of VIS/IR satellite data into accurate soil moisture estimates at high spatial resolution. In preparation for the SMOS launch, the algorithm was tested using observations of the UPC Airborne RadIomEter at L-band (ARIEL) over the Soil Moisture Measurement Network of the University of Salamanca (REMEDHUS) in Zamora (Spain), and LANDSAT imagery. Results showed fairly good agreement with ground-based soil moisture measurements and illustrated the strength of the link between VIS/IR satellite data and soil moisture status. Following the SMOS launch, a downscaling strategy for the estimation of soil moisture at high resolution from SMOS using MODIS VIS/IR data has been developed. The method has been applied to some of the first SMOS images acquired during the commissioning phase and is validated against in situ soil moisture data from the OZnet soil moisture monitoring network, in South-Eastern Australia. Results show that the soil moisture variability is effectively captured at 10 and 1 km spatial scales without a significant degradation of the root mean square error. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar (ASAR) Global Monitoring (GM) mode offers an opportunity for global soil moisture (SM) monitoring at much finer spatial resolution than that provided by the currently operational Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for the Earth Observing System and future planned missions such as Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity and Soil Moisture Active Passive. Considering the difficulties in modeling the complex soil-vegetation scattering mechanisms and the great need of ancillary data for microwave backscatter SM inversion, algorithms based on temporal change are currently the best method to examine SM variability. This paper evaluates the spatial sensitivity of the ASAR GM surface SM product derived using the temporal change detection methodology developed by the Vienna University of Technology. This evaluation is made for an area in southeastern Australia using data from the National Airborne Field Experiment 2005. The spatial evaluation is made using three different types of SM data (station, field, and airborne) across several different scales (1-25 km). Results confirmed the expected better agreement when using point (Rstation = 0.75) data as compared to spatial (RPLMR, 1km = 0.4) data. While the aircraft-ASAR GM correlation values at 1-km resolution were low, they significantly improved when averaged to 5 km (RPLMR, 5km = 0.67) or coarser. Consequently, this assessment shows the ASAR GM potential for monitoring SM when averaged to a spatial resolution of at least 5 km. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper develops two alternative approaches for downscaling passive microwave-derived soil moisture. Ground and airborne data collected over the Walnut Gulch experimental watershed during the Monsoon'90 experiment were used to test these approaches. These data consisted of eight micrometeorological stations (METFLUX) and six flights of the L-band Push Broom Microwave Radiometer (PBMR). For each PBMR flight, the 180-rn resolution L-band pixels covering the eight METFLUX sites were first aggregated to generate a 500-rn "coarse-scale" passive microwave pixel. The coarse-scale-derived soil moisture was then downscaled to the 180-m resolution using two different surface soil moisture indexes (SMIs): 1) the evaporative fraction (EF), which is the ratio of the evapotranspiration to the total energy available at the surface; and 2) the actual EF (AEF), which is defined as the ratio of the actual-to-potential evapotranspiration. It is well known that both SMIs depend on the surface soil moisture. However, they are also influenced by other factors such as vegetation cover, soil type, root-zone soil moisture, and atmospheric conditions. In order to decouple the influence of soil moisture from the other factors, a land surface model was used to account for the heterogeneity of vegetation cover, soil type, and atmospheric conditions. The overall accuracy in the downscaled values was evaluated to 3% (vol.) for EF and 2% (vol.) for AEF under cloud-free conditions. These results illustrate the potential use of satellite-based estimates of instantaneous evapotranspiration on clear-sky days for downscaling the coarse-resolution passive microwave soil moisture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]