Search

Estimating set similarity and detecting highly similar sets are fundamental problems in areas such as databases and machine learning. MinHash is a well-known technique for approximating Jaccard similarity of sets and has been successfully used for many applications. Its two compressed versions, $b$ b -bit MinHash and Odd Sketch, can significantly reduce the memory usage of the MinHash, especially for estimating high similarities (i.e., similarities around 1). Although MinHash can be applied to static sets as well as streaming sets, of which elements are given in a streaming fashion, unfortunately, $b$ b -bit MinHash and Odd Sketch fail to deal with streaming data. To solve this problem, we previously designed a memory-efficient sketch method, MaxLogHash, to accurately estimate Jaccard similarities in streaming sets. Compared with MinHash, our method uses smaller sized registers (each register consists of less than 7 bits) to build a compact sketch for each set. In this paper, we further develop a faster method, MaxLogOPH++. Compared with MaxLogHash, MaxLogOPH++ reduces the time complexity for updating each coming element from $O(k)$ O (k) to $O(1)$ O (1) with a small additional memory. We conduct experiments on a variety of datasets, and experimental results demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of our methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Both cost-sensitive classification and online learning have been extensively studied in data mining and machine learning communities, respectively. However, very limited study addresses an important intersecting problem, that is, “Cost-Sensitive Online Classification”. In this paper, we formally study this problem, and propose a new framework for Cost-Sensitive Online Classification by directly optimizing cost-sensitive measures using online gradient descent techniques. Specifically, we propose two novel cost-sensitive online classification algorithms, which are designed to directly optimize two well-known cost-sensitive measures: (i) maximization of weighted sum of sensitivity and specificity, and (ii) minimization of weighted misclassification cost. We analyze the theoretical bounds of the cost-sensitive measures made by the proposed algorithms, and extensively examine their empirical performance on a variety of cost-sensitive online classification tasks. Finally, we demonstrate the application of the proposed technique for solving several online anomaly detection tasks, showing that the proposed technique could be a highly efficient and effective tool to tackle cost-sensitive online classification tasks in various application domains. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search (ANNS) is a fundamental problem in many areas of machine learning and data mining. During the past decade, numerous hashing algorithms are proposed to solve this problem. Every proposed algorithm claims to outperform Locality Sensitive Hashing (LSH), which is the most popular hashing method. However, the evaluation of these hashing article was not thorough enough, and the claim should be re-examined. If implemented correctly, almost all the hashing methods will have their performance improved as the code length increases. However, many existing hashing article only report the performance with the code length shorter than 128. In this article, we carefully revisit the problem of search-with-a-hash-index and analyze the pros and cons of two popular hash index search procedures. Then we proposed a simple but effective novel hash index search approach and made a thorough comparison of eleven popular hashing algorithms. Surprisingly, the random-projection-based Locality Sensitive Hashing ranked the first, which is in contradiction to the claims in all the other 10 hashing article. Despite the extreme simplicity of random-projection-based LSH, our results show that the capability of this algorithm has been far underestimated. For the sake of reproducibility, all the codes used in the article are released on GitHub, which can be used as a testing platform for a fair comparison between various hashing algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]