Search

Studies have been taken into the breakdown voltage jitter of corona-stabilized switch at high repetition rate up to several kHz. It is thought that the gas recovery affect the jitter of breakdown voltage directly at high repetition rate, because the gas switch will breakdown at a low voltage if the gas cannot fully recover. The breakdown voltage jitter is called voltage jitter in the following paper. However, based on the experimental results, the voltage jitter still exists at low repetition rate, even at single-shot mode. This is not explained by the previous studies. In this paper, voltage jitter below 100 Hz of a corona-stabilized switch is investigated experimentally. A corona-stabilized switch is introduced, using a cylindrical electrode as the cathode and a plane electrode as the anode. The gas used between the electrodes is SF6. A negative pulse with a maximum width of 30~\mu \texts is used to charge this switch. The tested factors include gas pressure, gap space, repetition rate, and switch geometry. Experimental results show that voltage jitter is mainly affected by the gas pressure and switch geometry. It is seen that voltage jitter decreases as gas pressure increases and a suitable cathode geometry presents a low voltage jitter. Critical volume is a region close to the highly stressed electrode, where the presence of an electron will lead to an electron avalanche which attains a critical size and hence leads to a stabilizing corona. Critical volume is introduced to explain the experimental results. It is found that less voltage jitter can be achieved with a smaller and more concentrated critical volume, as well as efficient corona stabilization. The results indicate that voltage jitter may be reduced by optimize the critical volume at low repetition rate. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

In order to investigate the different features of the positive leader propagation in the rod–plane and inverted rod–plane gaps, the discharge experiments in a 3-m rod–plane gap and a 3-m inverted rod–plane gap were carried out under switching impulse voltage. The positive leader propagation process was recorded by using a high-speed CCD camera. Some aspects to describe the positive leader propagation characteristics of the rod–plane and inverted rod–plane gaps are obtained and compared in this paper, including the critical corona radius, the average continuous leader inception voltage, the axial leader velocity, and the final jump length. The possible reason resulting in those differences is also discussed here. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]