Search

A single-station-based lighting mapping system comprising a microphone array, which detects electromagnetic (EM) and thunder signals, has recently been developed and deployed for lightning observations. Using one microphone array consisting of 19 electret microphones installed on a 3-D steel frame, this system receives and processes the EM and thunder signals to determine the location of lightning thunder sources. We implement a new broadband direction-of-arrival estimation technique, namely, the maximum power beamforming algorithm and derive the 3-D location results based on the time difference between the acoustic signal and the EM signal. In this paper, four cloud-to-ground flashes with different branch channels recorded by the system are analyzed and presented in which the located thunder sources of two lightning flashes are compared with the photograph of the high-speed camera. The details of the system implementation along with the successful reconstruction of the lightning channel in 2-D and 3-D space are discussed. The results indicate that the location system could effectively map the lightning thunder sources, and the result is highly consistent with the high-speed video camera images. Moreover, the acoustic mapping system is capable of locating the main channel produced by the return stroke process; it also depicts the branching channels. It is shown that the system is capable of distinguish different branches of the same lightning; it also obtains different lightning channels occurring almost simultaneously. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In order to investigate the different features of the positive leader propagation in the rod–plane and inverted rod–plane gaps, the discharge experiments in a 3-m rod–plane gap and a 3-m inverted rod–plane gap were carried out under switching impulse voltage. The positive leader propagation process was recorded by using a high-speed CCD camera. Some aspects to describe the positive leader propagation characteristics of the rod–plane and inverted rod–plane gaps are obtained and compared in this paper, including the critical corona radius, the average continuous leader inception voltage, the axial leader velocity, and the final jump length. The possible reason resulting in those differences is also discussed here. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]