Search

This article classifies, describes, and critically compares different modeling techniques and control methods for dual-active-bridge (DAB) dc–dc converters and provides explicit guidance about the DAB controller design to practicing engineers and researchers. First, available modeling methods for DAB including reduced-order model, generalized average model, and discrete-time model are classified and quantitatively compared using simulation results. Based on this comparison, recommendations for suitable DAB modeling method are given. Then, we comprehensively review the available control methods including feedback-only control, linearization control, feedforward plus feedback, disturbance-observer-based control, feedforward current control, model predictive current control, sliding mode control, and moving discretized control set model predictive control. Frequency responses of the closed-loop control-to-output and output impedance are selected as the metrics of the ability in voltage tracking and the load disturbance rejection performance. The frequency response plots of the closed-loop control-to-output transfer function and output impedance of each control method are theoretically derived or swept using simulation software PLECS and MATLAB. Based on these plots, remarks on each control method are drawn. Some practical control issues for DAB including dead-time effect, phase drift, and dc magnetic flux bias are also reviewed. This article is accompanied by PLECS simulation files of the reviewed control methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Triple-phase shift (TPS) is commonly utilized to enhance the efficiency of the dual-active-bridge (DAB) converters. However, the small-signal model of the circuit varies with operating mode, terminal voltage ratio, and power. In order to address this issue, a control inspired by the finite-control set model-predictive control is proposed. The proposed moving discretized control set model-predictive control (MDCS-MPC) can achieve great control flexibility and good transition performance throughout the power and terminal voltage range with global control parameters. It presents fixed switching frequency with low computational burden due to the utilization of only two prediction horizons. The operating principle of the proposed MDCS-MPC is introduced in development of a cost function that provides stiff load voltage regulation. The steady-state error in MDCS-MPC has also been analyzed and compensated. The application of MDCS-MPC in a multiobjective control scenario has been addressed. Experiments on a 300-V/300-V 20-kHz 1-kW DAB converter are carried out to verify the theoretical claims. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pulsed power loads (PPLs) are becoming prevalent in medium-voltage naval dc micro-grids. To alleviate their effects on the system, energy storages are commonly installed. For optimal performance, their interface converters need to have fast dynamics and excellent disturbance rejection capability. Moreover, these converters often need to have voltage transformation and galvanic isolation capability since common energy storage technologies such as batteries and supercaps are typically assembled with low-voltage strings. In order to address these issues, a moving discretized control set model predictive control (MDCS-MPC) is proposed in this paper and applied on a dual-active-bridge converter. Fixed switching frequency is maintained, enabling easy passive components design. The proposed MDCS-MPC has a reduced prediction horizon, which allows low computational burden. The operating principle of the MDCS-MPC is introduced in the development of a cost function, which provides stiff voltage regulation. Resonance damping and sampling noise resistance can also be achieved with the proposed cost function. An adaptive step is introduced to enable a fast transition. Assessments on the performance of the proposed MDCS-MPC are conducted. Comparisons with other control methods are also provided. Experimental validations on a 300 V/300 V 20-kHz 1-kW dual-active-bridge converter are carried out to verify the theoretical claims. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper discussed an active-bridge-active-clamp (ABAC) topology that is suitable for highpower more-electric-aircraft applications. Though conventional modulation techniques can be applied to ABAC converters, they present drawbacks, such as increased low-voltage (LV) current ripple and limited power transfer capability. To address these problems, a phase-shift-modulation (PSM) scheme is proposed to provide clean dc terminal current at the LV side while maintaining high power transfer capability and efficiency in a wide operating range. The proposed PSM has a complete switching harmonics cancellation on the LV terminals independent of the operating conditions. This results in high quality power without any ac components, thus minimizing passive filtering. In addition, when terminal voltages vary from their nominal values, the proposed PSM can improve the maximum power transfer capability of the ABAC converter compared to the conventional approach. The theoretical claims are validated by both simulation and experimental results on a 10-kW 270-V/28-V ABAC converter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]