Search

Securing profits from energy, reserve capacity and balancing markets is critical to ensure the profitability of battery energy systems (BES). However, the intimate connection between offers on these trading floors combined with the limited energy storage capacity of BES renders its scheduling very complex. In this paper, we develop a bilevel optimization problem for strategic participation of a BES in the day-ahead energy-reserve and balancing markets, improving the state-of-the-art by (i) considering the conditional-value-at-risk; (ii) ensuring the real-time feasibility of the obtained day-ahead schedule; (iii) addressing the operational underperformance risk stemming from inaccurate battery modeling. In a case study, we illustrate how the proposed model allows risk-averse BES owners to hedge their day-ahead position without jeopardizing their expected profit, while ensuring the feasibility of their day-ahead schedule. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Efficient operation of electricity markets necessitates a penalty mechanism to penalize market participants who do not fulfill their market obligations. However, the traditional penalty mechanisms that have been successfully implemented in wholesale electricity markets may result in unintended consequences in transactive markets where the participants have uncertain supply or demand. In this regard, this letter investigates main challenges of applying traditional penalty mechanisms in transactive energy markets. Some efficient strategies are also proposed to operate the transactive markets in such a way that guarantees its security as well as liquidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We propose a chance-constrained formulation for the problem of dimensioning frequency restoration reserves on a power transmission network. We cast our problem as a two-stage stochastic mixed integer linear program, and propose a heuristic algorithm for solving the problem. Our model accounts for the simultaneous sizing of both upward and downward reserves, and uncertainty driven by imbalances, contingencies and available transmission capacity. Our core methodology is further adapted in order to minimize inter-zonal flows and in order to split reserve requirements between automatic and manual frequency restoration reserves. We apply our methodology to the problem of sizing reserves in the four load frequency control areas of the Swedish power system. We demonstrate the benefits of our method in terms of decreasing reserve requirements in the absence of reserve sharing, we analyze the spatial allocation of reserves, and we perform various sensitivity analyses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]