Search

When solving constrained optimization problems (COPs) by evolutionary algorithms, the search algorithm plays a crucial role. In general, we expect that the search algorithm has the capability to balance not only diversity and convergence but also constraints and objective function during the evolution. For this purpose, this paper proposes a composite differential evolution (DE) for constrained optimization, which includes three different trial vector generation strategies with distinct advantages. In order to strike a balance between diversity and convergence, one of these three trial vector generation strategies is able to increase diversity, and the other two exhibit the property of convergence. In addition, to accomplish the tradeoff between constraints and objective function, one of the two trial vector generation strategies for convergence is guided by the individual with the least degree of constraint violation in the population, and the other is guided by the individual with the best objective function value in the population. After producing offspring by the proposed composite DE, the feasibility rule and the $\boldsymbol {\varepsilon }$ constrained method are combined elaborately for selection in this paper. Moreover, a restart scheme is proposed to help the population jump out of a local optimum in the infeasible region for some extremely complicated COPs. By assembling the above techniques together, a constrained composite DE is proposed. The experiments on two sets of benchmark test functions with various features, i.e., 24 test functions from IEEE CEC2006 and 18 test functions with 10 dimensions and 30 dimensions from IEEE CEC2010, have demonstrated that the proposed method shows better or at least competitive performance against other state-of-the-art methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pareto dominance-based multiobjective optimization has been successfully applied to constrained evolutionary optimization during the last two decades. However, as another famous multiobjective optimization framework, decomposition-based multiobjective optimization has not received sufficient attention from constrained evolutionary optimization. In this paper, we make use of decomposition-based multiobjective optimization to solve constrained optimization problems (COPs). In our method, first of all, a COP is transformed into a biobjective optimization problem (BOP). Afterward, the transformed BOP is decomposed into a number of scalar optimization subproblems. After generating an offspring for each subproblem by differential evolution, the weighted sum method is utilized for selection. In addition, to make decomposition-based multiobjective optimization suit the characteristics of constrained evolutionary optimization, weight vectors are elaborately adjusted. Moreover, for some extremely complicated COPs, a restart strategy is introduced to help the population jump out of a local optimum in the infeasible region. Extensive experiments on three sets of benchmark test functions, namely, 24 test functions from IEEE CEC2006, 36 test functions from IEEE CEC2010, and 56 test functions from IEEE CEC2017, have demonstrated that the proposed method shows better or at least competitive performance against other state-of-the-art methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Convergence, diversity and feasibility are three important issues when solving constrained multiobjective optimization problems (CMOPs). To deal with the balance among convergence, diversity and feasibility well, this article proposes a cooperative multiobjective evolutionary algorithm with propulsive population (CMOEA-PP) for solving CMOPs. CMOEA-PP has two populations, including propulsive population and normal population, and these two populations work cooperatively. Specifically, propulsive population focuses on convergence. Normal population gives priority to feasibility and is obligated to maintain diversity. To cross through the infeasible region and reach the Pareto front (PF), propulsive population does not consider constraints in the early stage and only considers constraints in the later stage. To further accelerate the speed of convergence, propulsive population only searches for corner solutions and center solutions, while normal population searches for the whole PF. As a result, propulsive population can cross through the infeasible region because of the lack of attention to feasibility. In addition, propulsive population also can guide and accelerate the convergence of the evolutionary process. Comprehensive experiment results on several sets of benchmark problems demonstrate that CMOEA-PP is better than existing state-of-the-art competitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Solving constrained multiobjective optimization problems brings great challenges to an evolutionary algorithm, since it simultaneously requires the optimization among several conflicting objective functions and the satisfaction of various constraints. Hence, how to adjust the tradeoff between objective functions and constraints is crucial. In this article, we propose a dynamic selection preference-assisted constrained multiobjective differential evolutionary (DE) algorithm. In our approach, the selection preference of each individual is suitably switching from the objective functions to constraints as the evolutionary process. To be specific, the information of objective function, without considering any constraints, is extracted based on Pareto dominance to maintain the convergence and diversity by exploring the feasible and infeasible regions; while the information of constraint is used based on constrained dominance principle to promote the feasibility. Then, the tradeoff in these two kinds of information is adjusted dynamically, by emphasizing the utilization of objective functions at the early stage and focusing on constraints at the latter stage. Furthermore, to generate the promising offspring, two DE operators with distinct characteristics are selected as components of the search algorithm. Experiments on four test suites including 56 benchmark problems indicate that the proposed method exhibits superior or at least competitive performance, in comparison with other well-established methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A mixed-integer programming (MIP) problem contains not only constraints but also integer restrictions. Integer restrictions divide the feasible region defined by constraints into multiple discontinuous feasible parts with different sizes. Several popular methods (e.g., rounding and truncation) have been proposed to deal with integer restrictions. Although it is easy for these methods to generate an integer, they tend to converge to an integer which is located in a feasible part with a big size. If the optimal solution is not in this feasible part, they are very likely to converge to a local optimal solution due to the loss of diversity of the population. To overcome this shortcoming, a biobjective optimization-based two-phase method is proposed in this article. In the first phase, a measure function is designed to compute the degree that a solution violates integer restrictions. By employing this measure function as the second objective function and removing integer restrictions, a MIP problem is transformed into a constrained biobjective optimization problem (CBOP). It can be proven that the Pareto optimal solution of the transformed CBOP which satisfies integer restrictions is the optimal solution of the original MIP problem. To solve the transformed CBOP, a new comparison rule is designed. After the first phase, the population can approach the Pareto optimal solution which satisfies integer restrictions. Then, the second phase is implemented to enhance the convergence precision and obtain the optimal solution. In addition, we design 12 test problems to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method. The results demonstrate that the proposed method shows better performance against five state-of-the-art evolutionary algorithms for MIP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evolutionary algorithms and swarm intelligence algorithms have been widely used for constrained optimization problems for decades and numerous techniques for constraint handling have been proposed. The ${\varepsilon }$ -constrained method is a very effective one. In the literature, the ${\varepsilon }$ value was usually controlled via an exponential function, which is not competent for solving certain types of constrained optimization problems, e.g., whose global optima are located near the boundary of the feasible and infeasible regions. To solve this problem, this article proposes a new adaptive ${\varepsilon }$ control method and incorporate it into a basic differential evolution (DE) algorithm: (DE/rand/1/exp). Based on the information of constraint violation in the current population, the adaptive method controls the value of ${\varepsilon }$ through a simple heuristic rule. Compared with the traditional exponential function-based control methods, the proposed adaptive method can prevent the algorithm from being trapped into local optima while retaining the obtained near-optimal candidate solutions in the infeasible region for generating promising searching paths. Besides, we set the crossover rate (CR) as a more reasonable value for DE/rand/1/exp, which can enhance the efficiency significantly. The well-known 2006 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2006) competition on real-parameter single-objective constrained optimization benchmark is adopted to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed adaptive ${\varepsilon }$ -constrained DE. Fifteen constrained engineering optimization problems are collected from the literature to test the proposed algorithm. Moreover, the adaptive ${\varepsilon }$ control method is extended to an adaptive algorithm to solve the benchmark problems from CEC 2017. The comparison results confirm the superiority of the proposed method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]