Search

It is generally accepted that the essential goal of many-objective optimization is the balance between convergence and diversity. For constrained many-objective optimization problems (CMaOPs), the feasibility of solutions should be considered as well. Then the real challenge of constrained many-objective optimization can be generalized to the balance among convergence, diversity, and feasibility. In this paper, a tri-goal evolution framework is proposed for CMaOPs. The proposed framework carefully designs two indicators for convergence and diversity, respectively, and converts the constraints into the third indicator for feasibility. Since the essential goal of constrained many-objective optimization is to balance convergence, diversity, and feasibility, the philosophy of the proposed framework matches the essential goal of constrained many-objective optimization well. Thus, it is natural to use the proposed framework to deal with CMaOPs. Further, the proposed framework is conceptually simple and easy to instantiate for constrained many-objective optimization. A variety of balance schemes and ranking methods can be used to achieve the balance among convergence, diversity and feasibility. Three typical instantiations of the proposed framework are then designed. Experimental results on a constrained many-objective optimization test suite show that the proposed framework is highly competitive with existing state-of-the-art constrained many-objective evolutionary algorithms for CMaOPs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Convergence, diversity and feasibility are three important issues when solving constrained multiobjective optimization problems (CMOPs). To deal with the balance among convergence, diversity and feasibility well, this article proposes a cooperative multiobjective evolutionary algorithm with propulsive population (CMOEA-PP) for solving CMOPs. CMOEA-PP has two populations, including propulsive population and normal population, and these two populations work cooperatively. Specifically, propulsive population focuses on convergence. Normal population gives priority to feasibility and is obligated to maintain diversity. To cross through the infeasible region and reach the Pareto front (PF), propulsive population does not consider constraints in the early stage and only considers constraints in the later stage. To further accelerate the speed of convergence, propulsive population only searches for corner solutions and center solutions, while normal population searches for the whole PF. As a result, propulsive population can cross through the infeasible region because of the lack of attention to feasibility. In addition, propulsive population also can guide and accelerate the convergence of the evolutionary process. Comprehensive experiment results on several sets of benchmark problems demonstrate that CMOEA-PP is better than existing state-of-the-art competitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Solving constrained multiobjective optimization problems brings great challenges to an evolutionary algorithm, since it simultaneously requires the optimization among several conflicting objective functions and the satisfaction of various constraints. Hence, how to adjust the tradeoff between objective functions and constraints is crucial. In this article, we propose a dynamic selection preference-assisted constrained multiobjective differential evolutionary (DE) algorithm. In our approach, the selection preference of each individual is suitably switching from the objective functions to constraints as the evolutionary process. To be specific, the information of objective function, without considering any constraints, is extracted based on Pareto dominance to maintain the convergence and diversity by exploring the feasible and infeasible regions; while the information of constraint is used based on constrained dominance principle to promote the feasibility. Then, the tradeoff in these two kinds of information is adjusted dynamically, by emphasizing the utilization of objective functions at the early stage and focusing on constraints at the latter stage. Furthermore, to generate the promising offspring, two DE operators with distinct characteristics are selected as components of the search algorithm. Experiments on four test suites including 56 benchmark problems indicate that the proposed method exhibits superior or at least competitive performance, in comparison with other well-established methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]